This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Octane Numbers of Ethanol-Gasoline Blends: Measurements and Novel Estimation Method from Molar Composition
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 16, 2012 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Ethanol has a high octane rating and can be added to gasoline to produce high octane fuel blends. Understanding the octane increase with ethanol blending is of great fundamental and practical importance. Potential issues with fuel flow rate and fuel vaporization have led to questions of the accuracy of octane measurements for ethanol-gasoline blends with moderate to high ethanol content (e.g., E20-E85) using the Cooperative Fuel Research (CFR™) engine. The nonlinearity of octane ratings with volumetric ethanol content makes it difficult to assess the accuracy of such measurements.
In the present study, Research Octane Number (RON) and Motor Octane Number (MON) were measured for a matrix of ethanol-gasoline blends spanning a wide range of ethanol content (E0, E10, E20, E30, E50, E75) in a set of gasoline blendstocks spanning a range of RON values (82, 88, 92, and 95). Octane ratings for neat ethanol, denatured ethanol, and hydrous ethanol were also measured. One set of measurements was conducted using a CFR™ engine equipped with manufacturer-supplied enhancements (GE Energy Waukesha XCP-OA™ digital octane panel) for digital knock measurement and precise control of temperatures and fuel flow. A second set of measurements was conducted at a separate laboratory with a CFR™ engine equipped with an adjustable-orifice fuel jet. Both approaches address fuel flow issues at high ethanol concentrations.
A linear molar octane blending model was found to describe most of the nonlinearity in the RON and MON data, but measured values were still somewhat greater than predicted. Deviations from the linear model can be described by a term with 2nd-order dependence on ethanol content with a single scaling parameter (Pg). The parameter Pg can be estimated from the measured octane number of a 50:50 molar alcohol-gasoline blend and the octane numbers of the gasoline (ONg) and alcohol (ONa). The octane number of any ethanol-gasoline blend (ONb) with that blendstock can then be estimated (within 1 ON) from the molar fraction of the alcohol (xa) using the following expression: ONb = (1-xa)ONg + xaONa + Pg xa (1-xa)(ONa - ONg).
This study supports a companion paper (SAE 2012-01-1277) in which a state-of-the-art single-cylinder engine equipped with multiple fuel injection systems was used to evaluate the knock-limited performance of the ethanol-gasoline blends described herein and to evaluate the relevance of octane ratings and heat of vaporization as predictors of this performance.
- James E. Anderson - Ford Motor Company
- Thomas G. Leone - Ford Motor Company
- Michael H. Shelby - Ford Motor Company
- Timothy J. Wallington - Ford Motor Company
- Jeffrey J. Bizub - GE Energy Waukesha
- Michael Foster - BP Products North America Inc.
- Michael G. Lynskey - BP Products North America Inc.
- Dusan Polovina - AVL Powertrain Engineering Inc.
CitationAnderson, J., Leone, T., Shelby, M., Wallington, T. et al., "Octane Numbers of Ethanol-Gasoline Blends: Measurements and Novel Estimation Method from Molar Composition," SAE Technical Paper 2012-01-1274, 2012, https://doi.org/10.4271/2012-01-1274.
- Anderson, J., Hardigan, P., Ginder, J., Wallington, T. et al., “Implications of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 for the US Light-Duty Vehicle Fleet,” SAE Technical Paper 2009-01-2770, 2009, doi:10.4271/2009-01-2770.
- ASTM International, “Standard Specification for Ethanol Fuel Blends for Flexible-Fuel Automotive Spark-Ignition Engines”, ASTM D 5798-11, Rev. 2011.
- Andersen, V. F., Anderson, J. E., Wallington, T. J., Mueller, S. A. and Nielsen, O. J., “Vapor Pressures of Alcohol-Gasoline Blends”, Energy Fuels 24(6):3647-3654, 2010.
- Andersen, V. F., Anderson, J. E., Wallington, T. J., Mueller, S. A. and Nielsen, O. J., “Distillation Curves for Alcohol-Gasoline Blends”, Energy Fuels 24(4):2683-2691, 2010.
- Anderson, J.E., Kramer, U., Mueller, S. A., and Wallington, T. J., “Octane Numbers of Ethanol- and Methanol-Gasoline Blends Estimated from Molar Concentrations”, Energy Fuels 24(12):6576-6585, 2010.
- Hunwartzen, I., “Modification of CFR Test Engine Unit to Determine Octane Numbers of Pure Alcohols and Gasoline-Alcohol Blends,” SAE Technical Paper 820002, 1982, doi: 10.4271/820002.
- Heywood, J. B., “Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals”, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1988.
- Linstrom, P.J. and Mallard, W.G., eds., “NIST Chemistry WebBook, NIST Standard Reference Database Number 69”, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD. http://webbook.nist.gov.
- American Petroleum Institute, “Alcohols and Ethers: A Technical Assessment of their Application as Fuels and Fuel Components”, Publication 4251, 3rd ed., Washington, DC, 2001.
- SAE International Surface Vehicle Information Report, “Alternative Automotive Fuels,” SAE Standard J1297, Rev. Jul. 2007.
- ASTM International, “Standard Test Method for Research Octane Number of Spark-Ignition Engine Fuel”, ASTM D 2699-11, Rev. 2011.
- ASTM International, “Standard Test Method for Motor Octane Number of Spark-Ignition Engine Fuel”, ASTM D 2700-11, Rev. 2011.
- Stein, R., House, C., and Leone, T., “Optimal Use of E85 in a Turbocharged Direct Injection Engine,” SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. 2(1):670-682, 2009, doi:10.4271/2009-01-1490.
- Milpied, J., Jeuland, N., Plassat, G., Guichaous, S. et al., “Impact of Fuel Properties on the Performances and Knock Behaviour of a Downsized Turbocharged DI SI Engine - Focus on Octane Numbers and Latent Heat of Vaporization,” SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. 2(1):118-126, 2009, doi:10.4271/2009-01-0324.
- Nakata, K., Uchida, D., Ota, A., Utsumi, S. et al., “The Impact of RON on SI Engine Thermal Efficiency,” SAE Technical Paper 2007-01-2007, 2007, doi:10.4271/2007-01-2007.
- Okamoto, K., Ichikawa, T., Saitoh, K., Oyama, K. et al., “Study of Antiknock Performance Under Various Octane Numbers and Compression Ratios in a DISI Engine,” SAE Technical Paper 2003-01-1804, 2003, doi:10.4271/2003-01-1804.
- Stein, R., Polovina, D., Roth, K., Foster, M. et al., “Effect of Heat of Vaporization, Chemical Octane, and Sensitivity on Knock Limit for Ethanol - Gasoline Blends,” SAE Technical Paper 2012-01-1277, 2012.
- Kalghatgi, G., Nakata, K., and Mogi, K., “Octane Appetite Studies in Direct Injection Spark Ignition (DISI) Engines,” SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-0244, 2005, doi:10.4271/2005-01-0244.
- Mittal, V. and Heywood, J., “The Shift in Relevance of Fuel RON and MON to Knock Onset in Modern SI Engines Over the Last 70 Years,” SAE Int. J. Engines 2(2):1-10, 2010, doi:10.4271/2009-01-2622.
- Mittal, V., Heywood, J., and Green, W., “The Underlying Physics and Chemistry behind Fuel Sensitivity,” SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. 3(1):256-265, 2010, doi:10.4271/2010-01-0617.
- ASTM International, “Standard Specification for Automotive Spark-Ignition Engine Fuel”, ASTM D 4814-11, Rev. 2011.
- Johnson, R. and Riley, R., “Single Cylinder Spark Ignition Engine Study of the Octane, Emissions, and Fuel Economy Characteristics of Methanol-Gasoline Blends,” SAE Technical Paper 760377, 1976, doi: 10.4271/760377.
- ASTM International, “Standard Practice for Calculating Heat of Vaporization or Sublimation from Vapor Pressure Data”, ASTM E 2071-10, Rev. 2010.
- Wagner, T., Gray, D., Zarah, B., and Kozinski, A., “Practicality of Alcohols as Motor Fuel,” SAE Technical Paper 790429, 1979, doi: 10.4271/790429.
- Owen, K. and Coley, T., “Automotive Fuels Reference Book-Second Edition,” Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc., Warrendale, PA, ISBN 978-1-56091-589-8, 1995, doi:10.4271/R-151.
- Ghosh, P., Hickey, K. J., and Jaffe, S. B., “Development of a Detailed Gasoline Composition-Based Octane Model”, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 45(1):337-345, 2006.
- van Basshuysen, R. and Schafer, F., “Modern Engine Technology from A to Z,” SAE International, Warrendale, PA, ISBN 978-0-7680-1705-2, 2007, doi:10.4271/R-373.
- Costa, R. C. and Sodré, J.R., “Hydrous Ethanol vs. Gasoline-Ethanol Blend: Engine Performance and Emissions”, Fuel 89(2):287-293, 2010.
- Harrington, J., “Water Addition to Gasoline-Effect on Combustion, Emissions, Performance, and Knock,” SAE Technical Paper 820314, 1982, doi: 10.4271/820314.
- ASTM Committee D02.01, “High Ethanol Capability Study”, a 5-laboratory round-robin study in North America, 2011.
- ASTM Committee D02.01, “Toluene Standardization, Fuel Blend Octane Number Calibration Research and Motor Methods of Test”, Research Report RR:D02-1208, January 9, 1987.
- ASTM Committee D02.01, “Program TCD93 Toluene Calibration Data 1993”, Research Report RR:D02-1354, April 27, 1995.
- ASTM Committee D02.01 National Exchange Group, R-1184, R-1185, and R-1186, a round-robin crosscheck study involving 25-31 laboratories in North America, 2010.
- Morgan, N., Smallbone, A., Bhave, A., Kraft, M., Cracknell, R., Kalghatgi, G., “Mapping Surrogate Gasoline Compositions into RON/MON Space”, Combustion and Flame 157:1122-1131, 2010.