This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Experimental and Statistical Comparison of Engine Response as a Function of Fuel Chemistry and Properties in CI and HCCI Engines
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 16, 2012 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Knowledge of how fuel chemistry and properties affect engine response is necessary for effective engine control. It may also be possible to tailor fuels to specific combustion modes, engine geometries, or for desired outputs to generate lower emissions and/or higher IMEP and efficiency. Fuel chemistry and properties have different effects on engine performance in CI and HCCI combustion. In this study, experiments were performed using a 517cc Hatz single-cylinder diesel engine and the same engine converted to run in HCCI mode, both equipped with advanced combustion analysis equipment. Engine performance results were modeled statistically with respect to fuel properties, operating parameters, and engine type to determine the extent to which fuel characteristics influence engine response, and how the response differs between the two combustion modes.
Experiments were performed using 16 fuels: ULSD, 9 FACE diesel fuels, and 6 P20 blends of unprocessed plant oils. These fuels were selected because they overlapped the installation of the diesel engine following a long series of HCCI experiments and because they represent a wide range of chemical compositions and properties. This set of fuels was run in CI and HCCI modes across a range of operating conditions. Engine response to the fuels and control parameters was modeled using AVL Cameo statistical modeling software utilizing 2nd order polynomial models with interactions.
The modeling results demonstrate that HCCI engines respond differently to cetane number and fuel volatility than do CI engines. In addition, engine performance is dictated by fuel chemistry and properties in degrees that differ from CI to HCCI modes. The models are validated and apply equally well to FACE fuels with well-defined fuel characteristics and the P20 plant oils with complex non-traditional fuel characteristics, indicating that the fuel variables selected accurately represent all of the fuels. The models can be used to optimize fuel characteristics and engine control for these specific engines and operating modes.
CitationBunce, M., Bunting, B., Wang, J., and Crawford, R., "Experimental and Statistical Comparison of Engine Response as a Function of Fuel Chemistry and Properties in CI and HCCI Engines," SAE Technical Paper 2012-01-0857, 2012, https://doi.org/10.4271/2012-01-0857.
- Sissine, F., “Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007: A Summary of Major Provisions,” CRS Report for Congress RL34294, 2007.
- National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Environmental Protection Agency, “Light-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards and Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards; Final Rule,” Federal Register, 2007.
- Heywood, J., Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals, McGraw-Hill Book Co, 1988.
- Kawano, D., Naito, H., Suzuki, H., Ishii, H. et al., “Effects of Fuel Properties on Combustion and Exhaust Emissions of Homogeneous Charge Compression Ignition (HCCI) Engine,” SAE Technical Paper 2004-01-1966, 2004, doi:10.4271/2004-01-1966.
- Weall, A. and Collings, N., “Highly Homogeneous Compression Ignition in a Direct Injection Diesel Engine Fuelled with Diesel and Biodiesel,” SAE Technical Paper 2007-01-2020, 2007, doi:10.4271/2007-01-2020.
- Najt, P. and Foster, D., “Compression-Ignited Homogeneous Charge Combustion,” SAE Technical Paper 830264, 1983, doi: 10.4271/830264.
- Petersen, B., Ekoto, I., and Miles, P., “An Investigation into the Effects of Fuel Properties and Engine Load on UHC and CO Emissions from a Light-Duty Optical Diesel Engine Operating in a Partially Premixed Combustion Regime,” SAE Int. J. Engines 3(2):38-55, 2010, doi:10.4271/2010-01-1470.
- Robbins, C., Hoekman, S., Gertler, A., Broch, A. et al., “Biodistillate Transportation Fuels 2. - Emissions Impacts,” SAE Technical Paper 2009-01-2724, 2009, doi:10.4271/2009-01-2724.
- Puschmann, H., Sommer, A., Liebig, D., Harrison, A. et al., “Emission and Ignition Effects of Alternative Fuels at Conventional and Premixed Diesel Combustion,” SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. 3(1):435-451, 2010, doi:10.4271/2010-01-0870.
- Kook, S. and Pickett, L., “Effect of Fuel Volatility and Ignition Quality on Combustion and Soot Formation at Fixed Premixing Conditions,” SAE Int. J. Engines 2(2):11-23, 2010, doi:10.4271/2009-01-2643.
- Alnajjar, M., Cannella, B., Dettman, H., Fairbridge, C., Franz, J., Gallant, T., Gieleciak, R., Hager, D., Lay, C., Lewis, S., Ratcliff, M., Sluder, S., Storey, J., Yin, H., Zigler, B., “Chemical and Physical Properties of the Fuels for Advanced Combustion Engines (FACE) Research Diesel Fuels,” Coordinating Research Council Report No. FACE-1, 2010.
- Bunting, B., Bunce, M., Joyce, B., Crawford, R., “Investigation and Optimization of Plant oil Chemistry for HCCI Combustion,” Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference for Sustainable Automotive Technologies, 2011.
- Motorenfabrik Hatz GMBH & Co, “Instruction Book: 1D42, 1D50, 1D81, 1D90,” 2008.
- Hallgren, B., Heywood, J., “Effects of Oxygenated Fuels on DI Diesel Combustion and Emissions,” SAE Technical Paper 2001-01-0648, 2001.
- Pradeep, V. and Sharma, R., “Evaluation of Performance, Emission and Combustion Parameters of a CI Engine Fuelled with Bio- Diesel from Rubber Seed Oil and its Blends,” SAE Technical Paper 2005-26-353, 2005, doi:10.4271/2005-26-353.