This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Definitions and Methods for Worst Case Materials in Formability Simulations
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 16, 2012 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Two types of approaches for material definitions and methods for worst case scenarios are explored. The first is from the material specification supplied by the OEM or the alloy producer for the material, which has basic material properties and no specific FLC. The potential exists that any material within the specification can be delivered to the stamping plants. The second is if the material is to be supplied within a narrowed band of material specification with a known FLC. For both cases, there is considerable pressure from product design to use the most formable material possible. However, if a material is delivered outside the FEA testing limits, the results can be catastrophic. A specification is proposed to take advantage of the formability capability to enhance product performance while minimizing stamping plant risk.
CitationOetjens, T. and Shulkin, B., "Definitions and Methods for Worst Case Materials in Formability Simulations," SAE Technical Paper 2012-01-0017, 2012, https://doi.org/10.4271/2012-01-0017.
- Keeler S.P. Backofen W.A. Plastic Instability and Failure in Sheet Stretched Over Rigid Punches Transactions of the ASM 2008 56 25 48
- Stoughton, T.B. Generalized Metal Failure Criteria Numisheet 2008 241 246
- Marciniak, Z. Duncan, J.L. Hu, S.J. Mechanisms of Sheet Metal Forming Butterworth Heinemann 2002
- Netter, J. Wasserman, W. Applied Linear Statistical Models Irwin
- Witte, R.S. Witte, J.S. Statistics Witte 2010