This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Trends in Bus Guardian for Automotive Communication - CAN, TTP/C and Flexray
Technical Paper
2011-36-0308
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
Safety critical systems are taking demands on automotive systems where the distributed embedded system needs a communication system with properties of fault tolerant real-time communication. In order to increase reliability of systems with serial communication, a device called bus guardian can be added on physical layer to perform management of schedules and data independently from the communication controller, monitoring timing and sending signals of bus status notifying error occurrences to the host. The goal of this paper is to present and perform a comparative analysis of different strategies of bus guardian used in CAN, TTP/C and Flexray protocols, applied in safety critical system in automobile domain. A comparison was carried out to describe the properties and application for each protocol.
Recommended Content
Journal Article | FPGA-Based Development for Sophisticated Automotive Embedded Safety Critical System |
Technical Paper | Formal Verification Method for Safety Diagnosis Software |
Technical Paper | Implementing FlexRay on Silicon |
Authors
Citation
de Moraes, P., Saotome, O., and Santos, M., "Trends in Bus Guardian for Automotive Communication - CAN, TTP/C and Flexray," SAE Technical Paper 2011-36-0308, 2011, https://doi.org/10.4271/2011-36-0308.Also In
References
- Kopetz, H. “Real-Time Systems: Design Principles for Distributed Embedded Applications.” Kluwer Academic 1997
- Robert Bosch Gmbh “CAN Specifications version 2.0”
- Flexray Consortium “Flexray Requirements Specification” 2.1 Flexray Consortium 2005 http://www.flexray.com
- TTA Group “Time-Triggered Protocol TTP/C, High-Level Specification, Document Protocol Version 1.1” http://www.ttagroup.com
- Broster, I. Burns, A. “An Analyzable Bus-Guardian for Event-Triggered Communication,” 410 24th IEEE International Real-Time Systems Symposium (RTSS'03) 2003
- Buja, G. Pimentel, J.R. Zuccollo, A. “Overcoming Babbling-Idiot Failures in CAN Networks: A Simple and Effective Bus Guardian Solution for the FlexCAN Architecture,” IEEE Trans. on Industrial Informatics 54 3 July 2007
- Flexray Consortium “Flexray Preliminary Node-Local Bus Guardian Specification” 2.0.9 Flexray Consortium 2005 http://www.flexray.com
- Flexray Consortium “Flexray Preliminary Central Bus Guardian Specification” 2.0.9 Flexray Consortium 2005 http://www.flexray.com
- Dehbashi, M. Lari, V. Miremadi, S. Shokrollah-Shirazi, M. “Fault Effects in FlexRay-Based Networks with Hybrid Topology,” 491 496 2008. Third International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security 2008
- Wang, K. Wang, H. Xu, A. “Enforcing Fail-Silence in the Entire FlexRay Communication Cycle.” SAE Paper 2007-01-1499
- Wang, K. Wang, H. Xu, A. “Design and Quantitative Evaluation of a Novel Flexray Bus Guardian.” IEEE Intelligent Computing and Intelligent System (ICIS), 2010 Xiamen, China July 29 31 2010
- Bauer, G. Kopetz, H. Steiner, W. “The central bus guardian approach to enforce fault isolation in the TTA.” Proccedings of the 6th International Symposium on Autonomous Decentralized Systems Pisa 2003
- Bauer, G. Kopetz, H. Steiner, W. “Byzantine Fault Containment in TTP/C.” 1st International Real Time LANs in the Internet Age, Workshop on Vienna 2002
- Ademaj, A. Sivencrona, H. Bauer, G. Torin, J. “Evaluation of fault handling of the time-triggered architecture with bus and star topology.” 123 2003 International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN'03) 2003
- Rushby, J. “A Comparison of Bus Architectures for Safety-Critical Embedded Systems,” Technical Report, NASNCR-2003-212161 2003
- Kopetz, H. “A Comparison of TTP/C and FlexRay.” TV Wien Research Report 10 2001