This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
A Validation Methodology for Structural Health Monitoring
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published October 18, 2011 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
An essential part of the SHM validation effort is to check the presence and adequacy of the methods required to validate the correct functionality of each SHM task, which can be targeted at detecting structural faults. The ultimate proof of the correct functionality is validation evidence, e.g. crack detection evidence, observed during the operation of the aircraft. However, the occurrences of structural faults such as cracks are infrequent, and hence, years of flight tests might be required to collect validation evidence; small numbers of flights would be only sufficient to prove the system's “fitness for flight” and would be insufficient to prove “fitness for purpose”. Validation evidence can be collected during laboratory tests by inducing faults in structural specimens and examining the SHM detection capability. However, collecting validation evidence using simple structural specimens during laboratory tests would never provide the conclusive proof of correct functionality for the aircraft complex structural assembly. Therefore, a generalisation technique and calibration approach would be required to extrapolate from laboratory specimens to actual aircraft. This paper will present the technical details of such a validation method with the illustration example being the primary task of damage location detection in a composite structure.
CitationAzzam, H. and McFeat, J., "A Validation Methodology for Structural Health Monitoring," SAE Technical Paper 2011-01-2608, 2011, https://doi.org/10.4271/2011-01-2608.
- FAA, “Title 14 Aeronautics and Space, Chapter I - Part 25 - Airworthiness Standards: Transport Category Airplanes, §25.1309 Equipment, systems, and installation,” e-CFR, January 2011.
- European Aviation Safety Agency, “Certification Specifications for Large Aeroplanes, CS-25, Equipment, systems and installations CS 25.1309”, Amendment 9, 5 August 2010.
- HAHN Spring Limited, “Development, Validation, Qualification and Certification of Structural Health Monitoring Systems”, HAHN Spring Report 1/B001, Mar-11.
- HAHN Spring Limited, “Development, Validation, Qualification and Certification of Structural Health Monitoring Systems”, HAHN Spring Report 1/B002, Jun-11.
- FAA, “Certification Procedures for Products and Parts”, e-CFR, Title 14, Part 21 as of January 2011.
- FAA, “Airworthiness Standards: Normal, Utility, Acrobatic, and Commuter Category Airplanes”, e-CFR, Title 14, Part 23 as of January 2011.
- FAA, “Airworthiness Standards: Transport Category Airplanes”, e-CFR, Title 14, Part 25 as of January 2011.
- FAA, “Airworthiness Standards: Normal Category Rotorcraft”, e-CFR, Title 14, Part 27 as of January 2011.
- FAA, “Airworthiness Standards: Transport Category Rotorcraft”, e-CFR, Title 14, Part 29 as of January 2011.
- FAA, “Continued Airworthiness and Safety Improvements for Transport Category Airplanes”, e-CFR, Title 14, Part 26 as of January 2011.
- FAA, “General Operating and Flight Rules”, e-CFR, Title 14, Part 91 as of January 2011.
- FAA, “Operating Requirements: Domestic, Flag, and Supplemental Operations”, e-CFR, Title 14, Part 121 as of January 2011.
- SAE Aerospace Recommended Practice, “Certification Considerations for Highly-Integrated or Complex Aircraft Systems,” SAE Standard ARP4754, Issued November 1996.
- AIA, GAMA and FAA Aircraft Certification Service, “The FAA and Industry Guide to Product Certification”, September 2004.
- The UK Ministry of Defence, “Defence Standards (Def Stan) 00-970, Part 1 Issue 5 - Section 3: Structure”.
- The US Air Force, “Aircraft Structural Integrity Program”, MIL-HDBK-1530A.
- FAA, “Maintenance Review Board Report, Maintenance Type Board, and OEM/TCH Inspection Program Procedures”, FAA Advisory Circular, AC No: 121-22B, October 2010.
- FAA, “Damage Tolerance and Fatigue Evaluation of Structure”, FAA Advisory Circular, C No: 25.571-1-C, April 1998.