This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Final Tier 4 Emission Solution Using An Aftertreatment System With A Fuel Reformer, LNT, DPF And Optional SCR
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published September 13, 2011 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Diesel exhaust aftertreatment systems are required for meeting Final Tier 4 emission regulations. This paper addresses an aftertreatment system designed to meet the Final Tier 4 emission standards for nonroad vehicle markets. The aftertreatment system consists of a fuel dosing system, mixing elements, fuel vaporizer, fuel reformer, lean NOx trap (LNT), diesel particulate filter (DPF), and an optional selective catalytic reduction (SCR) catalyst. Aftertreatment system performance, both with and without the SCR, was characterized in an engine dynamometer test cell, using a 4.5 liter, pre-production diesel engine. The engine out NOx nominally ranged between 1.6 and 2.0 g/kW-hr while all operating modes ranged between 1.2 and 2.8 g/kW-hr. The engine out particulate matter was calibrated to approximately 0.1 g/kW-hr for various power ratings. Three engine power ratings of 104 kW, 85 kW and 78 kW were evaluated. Test results on aged catalysts show that the system performance met Final Tier 4 emission standards having NOx levels below 0.4 g/kW-hr under a range of test conditions that were reflective of actual vehicle operation. Aftertreatment performance was characterized under multiple testing conditions including the nonroad transient cycle (NRTC), ramped 8-mode cycle and a variety of steady state operating points to ensure all not-to-exceed (NTE) regulations were met. LNT regeneration, LNT desulfation and DPF regeneration were demonstrated in these test cycles while maintaining repeatable and consistent aftertreatment temperature control. Final Tier 4 emission standards were met with low fuel usages for LNT regeneration ranging between 1.4 and 3.1%. The aftertreatment system reduced NOx by 89% on the NRTC and 87% on the ramped 8-mode cycle. Likewise, a system without the SCR catalyst yielded similar results of 88% NOx reduction on the NRTC and 86% on the ramped 8-mode cycle. Both system configurations met Final Tier 4 emission levels.
|Journal Article||Diesel Emissions in Review|
|Technical Paper||A Review of the Literature on Modelling of Integrated SCR-in-DPF Systems|
|Journal Article||Diesel Emission Control in Review|
CitationNgan, E., Wetzel, P., McCarthy JR, J., Yue, Y. et al., "Final Tier 4 Emission Solution Using An Aftertreatment System With A Fuel Reformer, LNT, DPF And Optional SCR," SAE Technical Paper 2011-01-2197, 2011, https://doi.org/10.4271/2011-01-2197.
- McCarthy, J., Korhumel, T. and Marougy, A., “Performance of a Fuel Reformer, LNT and SCR Aftertreatment System Following 500 LNT Desulfation Events,” SAE Int. J. Commer. Veh. 2(2):34-44, 2009, doi:10.4271/2009-01-2835.
- U.S.E.P.A. (United States Environmental Protection Agency), Federal Register - CFR Part 69, p. 39216-39219, 2004.
- Ngan, E., Dykes, E., and McCarthy, J. Jr., “Aftertreatment System Performance of a Fuel Reformer, LNT and SCR System Meeting EPA 2010 Emission Standards on a Heavy-Duty Vehicle,” SAE Int. J. Commer. Veh. 3(1):130-142, 2010, doi:10.4271/2010-01-1942.
- Dykes, E., “NOx Performance of an LNT+SCR System Designed to Meet EPA 2010: Results of an Engine Dynamometer Tests,” SAE Int. J. Commer. Veh. 1(1):327-337, 2008, doi:10.4271/2008-01-2642.
- Chimner, C., “Transient On-Road Emission Reduction of an LNT & SCR Aftertreatment System,” SAE Int. J. Commer. Veh. 1(1):315-326, 2008, doi:10.4271/2008-01-2641.
- Armanini, B., McCarthy, J., “Fuel Vaporizer Catalyst Enables Compact Aftertreatment System Packaging by Reducing Mixing Length,” SAE Technical Paper 2010-01-1070, 2010, doi:10.4271/2010-01-1070.
- Yue, Y., Mahakul, B, Gui, X., McCarthy, J., Yang, H., Ngan, E. C., Price, K., “Meeting Nonroad Final Tier 4 Emissions on a 4045 John Deere Engine Using A Fuel Reformer and LNT System with An Optional SCR Showing Transparent Vehicle Operation, Vehicle Packaging and Compliance to End-of-Life Emissions,” SAE Technical Paper 2011-01-2206, 2011, doi:10.4271/2011-01-2206.
- Schommers, J. and Breitbach, H., “A Global Emission Strategy - Bluetec for Diesel Engines,” Auto Technology, Pages 48-51, Mar. 2007.
- Snow, R., Dobson, D., Hammerle, R., and Katare, S., “Robustness of a LNT-SCR System to Aging Protocol,” SAE Technical Paper 2007-01-0469, 2007, doi:10.4271/2007-01-0469.
- Theis, J. R., Ura, J. A. and McCabe, R. W., “The Effects of Sulfur Poisoning and Desulfation Temperature on the NOx Conversion of LNT+SCR Systems for Diesel Applications,” SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. 3(1):1-15, 2010, doi:10.4271/2010-01-0300.
- McCarthy, J. and Holtgreven, J., “Advanced NOx Aftertreatment System Performance Following 150 LNT Desulfation Events,” SAE Technical Paper 2008-01-1541, 2008, doi:10.4271/2008-01-1541.
- McCarthy, J. Jr., and Taylor, W. III,, “LNT+SCR Systems for Medium-Heavy Duty Application: A Systems Approach,” 13th Diesel Engine-Efficiency and Emission Research Conference, August 13-16, 2007, Detroit, MI.
- Hu, H., Reuter, J., Yan, J., and McCarthy, J., “Advanced NOx Aftertreatment System And Controls For On-Highway Heavy Duty Diesel Engines,” SAE Technical Paper 2006-01-3552, 2006, doi:10.4271/2006-01-3552.
- Poojary, D., Nicole, J., McCarthy, J. Jr., and Yang, H., “Improved System Performance and Reduced Cost of a Fuel Reformer, LNT and SCR Aftertreatment System Meeting Emissions Useful Life Requirements,” 2010 Directions in Energy-Efficiency and Emissions Research (DEER) Conference, Sept., 30th, 2010.
- Poojary, D., Yee, D. and Nicole, J., “Durability and PGM Cost Reduction of a Fuel Reformer, LNT, DPF and SCR Diesel Aftertreatment System,” JSAE 20119091.
- Pfahl, U., “Tier 4 Off-Highway Emission Challenges,” AVL Tech Café at SAE International, April 2007.
- Bamber, D., Ambrose, S. and McCarthy, J. Jr.,, “Exhaust Tailpipe Fuel Injector Optimization For Diesel Aftertreatment Systems Coupled With Exhaust Aftertreatment System Performance on a Heavy-Duty Diesel Engine Powered Vehicle,” 2010.
- McCarthy, J. Jr., “Simulation Of Fuel-Exhaust Mixing in Exhaust Aftertreatment Systems Using Simplified Spray Models For Pulse-Width Modulated Fuel Injectors,” Journal of Atomization and Sprays, Vol. 19, Issue 5, 2009, p. 425-444.
- U.S.E.P.A. (United States Environmental Protection Agency). December 2000 Regulatory Impact Analysis: Heavy-duty Engine and Vehicle Standards and Highway Diesel Fuel Sulfur Control Requirements. Chapter III, p. 96-98 EPA 420-R-00-26.
- Yang, H., Yuan, Q., Tsourapas, V., Prakash, A. K., et. al., “Hardware-in-the-Loop (HIL) Modeling and Simulation for Diesel Aftertreatment Controls Development,” SAE Technical Paper 2009-01-2928, 2009, doi:10.4271/2009-01-2928.
- Yang, H. and Chimner, C, “Integration of Reformer Model Based Estimation, Control, & Diagnostics for Diesel LNT Based Aftertreatment Systems,” SAE Technical Paper 2010-01-0569, 2010, doi:10.4271/2010-01-0569.