This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Engine Performance of Cu- and Fe-Based SCR Emission Control Systems for Heavy Duty Diesel Applications
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 12, 2011 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Since early 2010, most new medium- and heavy-duty diesel vehicles in the US rely on urea-based Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) technology for meeting the most stringent regulations on nitrogen oxides (NOx) emissions in the world today. Catalyst technologies of choice include Copper (Cu)- and Iron (Fe)-based SCR. In this work, the performances of Fe-SCR and Cu-SCR were investigated in the most commonly used DOC + CSF + SCR system configuration. Cu-SCR offered advantages over Fe-SCR in terms of low temperature conversion, NO₂:NOx ratio tolerance and NH₃ slip, while Fe-SCR demonstrated superior performance under optimized NO₂:NOx ratio and at higher temperatures. The Cu-SCR catalyst displayed less tolerance to sulfur (S) exposure. Reactor testing has shown that Cu-SCR catalysts deactivate at low temperature when poisoned by sulfur. The impact of sulfur on the Cu-SCR system was studied by exposing the catalysts to 350 ppm S fuel and measuring the system performance during engine transient and steady state conditions. Results revealed that, despite the negative impact that sulfur can have on Cu catalysts, practical standard operation modes and current system regeneration strategies sufficed to maintain the high NOx conversion performance required for the system. In this work, the performance of Cu- and Fe-SCR in the DOC + CSF + SCR configuration was also tested on field vehicles. Consistently high NOx conversion was observed during months of field trials on low temperature applications.
- Mario Castagnola - Johnson Matthey Inc.
- Jonathan Caserta - Johnson Matthey Inc.
- Sougato Chatterjee - Johnson Matthey Inc.
- Hai-Ying Chen - Johnson Matthey Inc.
- Raymond Conway - Johnson Matthey Inc.
- Joseph Fedeyko - Johnson Matthey Inc.
- Wassim Klink - Johnson Matthey Inc.
- Penelope Markatou - Johnson Matthey Inc.
- Sandip Shah - Johnson Matthey Inc.
- Andrew Walker - Johnson Matthey Inc.
CitationCastagnola, M., Caserta, J., Chatterjee, S., Chen, H. et al., "Engine Performance of Cu- and Fe-Based SCR Emission Control Systems for Heavy Duty Diesel Applications," SAE Technical Paper 2011-01-1329, 2011, https://doi.org/10.4271/2011-01-1329.
- 2007 Heavy-Duty Highway Rule, 40 CFR 69, 80, and 86, 2001
- Fedeyko, Joseph, Chen, B., Haiying, Chen, “Mechanistic study of the low temperature activity of transition metal exchanged zeolite SCR catalysts”, Catal. Today, 151 (2010) 231-236, doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2009.12.015.
- Kamasamudram, K., Yezerets, A., Chen, X., Currier, N. et al., “New Insights into Reaction Mechanism of Selective Catalytic Ammonia Oxidation Technology for Diesel Aftertreatment Applications,” SAE Technical Paper 2011-01-1314, 2011, doi:10.4271/2011-01-1314.
- Colombo, Massimo, Nova, Isabella, Tronconi, Enrico, “A comparative study of the NH3-SCR reactions over a Cu-zeolite and a Fe-zeolite catalyst”, Catal. Today 151 (2010) 223-230, doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2010.01.010.
- Cheng, Yisun, Lambert, Christine, Kim, Do Heui, Kwak, Ja Hun, Cho, Sung June, Peden, Charles, “The different impacts of SO2 and SO3 on Cu/zeolite SCR catalysts”, Catal. Today, 151 (2010) 266-270, doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2010.01.013.
- Pârvulescu, V.I., Grange, P., Delmon, B., “Catalytic removal of NO”, Catal. Today 46 (1998) 233-316