This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Charge Motion Benefits of Valve Deactivation to Reduce Fuel Consumption and Emissions in a GDi, VVA Engine
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 12, 2011 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Requirements for reduced fuel consumption with simultaneous reductions in regulated emissions require more efficient operation of Spark Ignited (SI) engines. An advanced valvetrain coupled with Gasoline Direct injection (GDi) provide an opportunity to simultaneously reduce fuel consumption and emissions. Work on a flex fuel GDi engine has identified significant potential to reduce throttling by using Early Intake Valve Closing (EIVC) and Late Intake Valve Closing (LIVC) strategies to control knock and load. High loads were problematic when operating on gasoline for particulate emissions, and low loads were not able to fully minimize throttling due to poor charge motion for the EIVC strategy. The use of valve deactivation was successful at reducing high load particulate emissions without a significant airflow penalty below 3000 RPM. Valve deactivation did increase the knocking tendency for knock limited fuels, due to increased heat transfer that increased charge temperature. Valve deactivation also extended the near un-throttled operation to lower loads (2 bar BMEP) by reducing burn durations and allowing higher levels of dilution. Results are presented showing the improvements in emissions and reduction in fuel consumption. Results from an optical engine and Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) at representative points are also presented to quantify the in-cylinder sprays and flow structures.
CitationMoore, W., Foster, M., Lai, M., Xie, X. et al., "Charge Motion Benefits of Valve Deactivation to Reduce Fuel Consumption and Emissions in a GDi, VVA Engine," SAE Technical Paper 2011-01-1221, 2011, https://doi.org/10.4271/2011-01-1221.
- Sellnau, M. Kunz, T. Sinnamon, J. Burkhard, J. “2-step Variable Valve Actuation: System Optimization and Integration on an SI Engine,” SAE Technical Paper 2006-01-0040 2006 10.4271/2006-01-0040
- Sellnau, M. Rask, E. “Two-Step Variable Valve Actuation for Fuel Economy, Emissions, and Performance,” SAE Technical Paper 2003-01-0029 2003 10.4271/2003-01-0029
- Cleary, D. Silvas, G. “Unthrottled Engine Operation with Variable Intake Valve Lift, Duration, and Timing,” SAE Technical Paper 2007-01-1282 2007 10.4271/2007-01-1282
- Sugiyama, T. Hiyoshi, R. Takemura, S. Aoyama, S. “Technology for Improving Engine Performance using Variable Mechanisms,” SAE Technical Paper 2007-01-1290 2007 10.4271/2007-01-1290
- Haugen, D.J. Blackshear, P.L. Pipho, M.J. Esler, W.J. “Modifications of a Quad 4 Engine to Permit Late Intake Valve Closure,” SAE Technical Paper 921663 1992 10.4271/921663
- Hoyer, K. Moore, W. Confer, K. “A Simulation Method to Guide DISI Engine Redesign for Increased Efficiency Using Alcohol Fuel Blends,” SAE Int. J. Engines 3 1 889 902 2010 10.4271/2010-01-1203
- Moore, W. Foster Hoyer, K. ‘Engine Efficiency Improvements Enabled by Ethanol Fuels, in an GDI, VVA Flex Fuel Engine,” SAE Technical Paper 2011-01-0900 2011 10.4271/2011-01-0900
- Stansfield, P.A. Wigley, G. Garner, C.P. Patel, R. Ladommatos, N. Pitcher, G. Turner, J.W.G. Nuglisch, H. Helie, J. “Un-throttled Engine Operation using Variable Valve Actuation: The Impact on the Flow Field, Mixing and Combustion,” SAE Technical Paper 2007-01-1414 2007 10.4271/2007-01-1414
- Patel, R. Ladommatos, N. Stansfield, P.A. Wigley, G. Garner, C.P. Pitcher, G. Turner, J.W.G. Nuglisch, H. “Comparison between Un-throttled, Single and Two-valve Induction Strategies Utilizing Direct Gasoline Injection: Emissions, Heat-release and Fuel Consumption Analysis,” SAE Technical Paper 2008-01-1626 2008 10.4271/2008-01-1626
- Matsumoto, A. Zheng, Y. Xie, X.B. Lai, M.C. Moore, W. “Characterization of Multi-hole Spray and Mixing of Ethanol and Gasoline Fuels under DI Engine Conditions,” SAE Technical Paper 2010-01-2151 2010 10.4271/2010-01-2151