Exhaust Particle Sensor for OBD Application
- Technical Paper
- ISSN 0148-7191
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.4271/2011-01-0626
Efforts to develop a sensor for on-board diagnostics (OBD) of diesel vehicles are intensive as diesel particulate filters (DPFs) have become widespread around the world. This study presents a novel sensor that has been successfully tested for OBD diagnosis of damaged DPFs. The sensor is based on the "escaping current" technique. Based on this, a sample of exhaust gas is charged by a corona-ionized flow and is pumped by an ejector dilutor built in the sensor's construction. While the majority of ions return to the grounded sensor's body, a small quantity is lost with the charged particles exiting the sensor. This "escaping current" is a measurement of the particle concentration in the exhaust gas. Such a sensor has been developed and tested in real-exhaust of a diesel car and a diesel engine. The sensor provides high resolution (1 Hz, 0.3 s response time) and high sensitivity superseding OBD requirements. The sensor was used on an engine to monitor the efficiency of damaged DPFs. The signal was found to perform similar to the smokemeter, a widespread instrument used for routine testing in automotive laboratories. The sensor was then installed in the exhaust of a vehicle to test the DPF efficiency of a well-operating and a damaged DPF over a transient test. The sensor was found to be sensitive enough to clearly detect a defected from a well-operating particle filter even at levels as low as 6 mg km-1. This study demonstrates that a soot sensor based on the escaping current technique has the potential to be used for OBD and DPF control on forthcoming light-duty and heavy-duty diesel vehicles.
CitationNtziachristos, L., Fragkiadoulakis, P., Samaras, Z., Janka, K. et al., "Exhaust Particle Sensor for OBD Application," SAE Technical Paper 2011-01-0626, 2011, https://doi.org/10.4271/2011-01-0626.
- Hepburn, J.S., Dobson, D.A., Hubbard, C.P., Guldberg, S.O. et al., “A Review of the Dual EGO Sensor Method for OBD-II Catalyst Efficiency Monitoring,” SAE Technical Paper 942057, 1994, doi: 10.4271/942057.
- Kato, N., Kurachi, H., and Hamada, Y. “Thick Film ZrO2 NOx Sensor for the Measurement of Low NOx Concentration,” SAE Technical Paper 980170, 1998, doi: 10.4271/980170.
- Herman, A., Wu, M.-C., Cabush, D., and Shost, M., “Model Based Control of SCR Dosing and OBD Strategies with Feedback from NH3 Sensors,” SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. 2(1):375-385, 2009, doi:10.4271/2009-01-0911.
- European Commission Regulation No 692/2008. Official Journal of the European Union L199 (2008).
- California Code of Regulations, Title 13, Section 1968.2, Malfunction and Diagnostic System Requirements for 2004 and Subsequent Model-Year Passenger Cars, Light-Duty Trucks, and Medium-Duty Vehicles and Engines (OBD II), Air Resources Board, CA, USA (2006).
- Pegasor, Oy., Tikkanen, J. Particle Measurement Process and Apparatus, Patent publication no WO 2009/109688 (2009).
- Lehtimäki, M., Modified Aerosol Detector, in Marple, V. A. and Liu, B.Y.H. (Ed.), Aerosols in Mining and Industrial Work Environment 3, 1135-1143. Ann Arbor Science Publishers, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA (1983).
- Siegmann, K. and Siegmann, H.C., “Fast and Reliable “in situ” Evaluation of Particles and their Surfaces with Special Reference to Diesel Exhaust,” SAE Technical Paper 2000-01-1995, 2000, doi:10.4271/2000-01-1995.
- Ntziachristos, L., Giechaskiel, B., Ristimäki, J., Keskinen, J. Use of a Corona Charger for the Characterisation of Automotive Exhaust Aerosol, J. Aerosol Sci. 35:943-963 (2004).
- Ntziachristos, L., Polidori, A., Phuleria, H., Geller, M.D. Application of a Diffusion Charger for the Measurement of Particle Surface Concentration in Different Environments, Aerosol Sci. Tech. 41:571-580 (2007).
- Shin, W.G., Pui, D.Y.H., Fissan, H., Neumann, S., Tramp, A. Calibration and Numerical Simulation of Nanoparticle Surface Area Monitor (TSI Model 3550 NSAM), J. Nanopart. Res. 9:61-69 (2007).
- Olfert, J.S., Symonds, J.P.R., Collings, N. The Effective Density and Fractal Dimension of Particles Emitted from a Light-duty Diesel Vehicle with a Diesel Oxidation Catalyst. J. Aerosol Sci. 38: 69-82 (2007).
- Harris, S.J., Maricq, M.M. Signature Size Distributions for Diesel and Gasoline Engine Exhaust Particulate Matter. J. Aerosol Sci. 32: 749-764 (2001).
- Ntziachristos, L., Mamakos, A., Samaras, Z., Mathis, U. et al., “Overview of the European “Particulates” Project on the Characterization of Exhaust Particulate Emissions from Road Vehicles: Results for Light-Duty Vehicles,” SAE Technical Paper 2004-01-1985, SAE Transactions - Journal of Fuels and Lubricants, 113, 2004, doi:10.4271/2004-01-1985.
- Schmid, O., Karg, E., Hagen, D.E., Whitefield, P.D., Ferron, G.A. 2007. On the effective density of non-spherical particles as derived from combined measurements of aerodynamic and mobility equivalent size, Journal of Aerosol Science 38, 431-443.
- Giechaskiel, B., Carriero, M., Martini, G., Krasenbrink, A. et al., “Calibration and Validation of Various Commercial Particle Number Measurement Systems,” SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. 2(1):512-530, 2009, doi:10.4271/2009-01-1115.
- Giechaskiel, B., Ntziachristos, L., Samaras, Z. Calibration and Modelling of Ejector Dilutors for Automotive Exhaust Sampling, Meas. Sci. Technol. 15:1-8 (2004).
- Dabhoiwala, R.H., Johnson, J.H., and Naber, J.D., “Experimental Study Comparing Particle Size and Mass Concentration Data for a Cracked and Un-Cracked Diesel Particulate Filter,” SAE Technical Paper 2009-01-0629, 2009, doi:10.4271/2009-01-0629.
- Seiler, V., Boeckmann, D., and Eilts, P., “Performance of Undamaged and Damaged Diesel Particulate Filters,” SAE Technical Paper 2008-01-0335, 2008, doi:10.4271/2008-01-0335.