This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Factors Moderating the Effectiveness of Rear Vision Systems: What Performance-Shaping Factors Contribute to Drivers' Detection and Response to Unexpected In-Path Obstacles When Backing?
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 12, 2011 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
General Motors (GM) and the Virginia Tech Transportation Institute (VTTI) have partnered to conduct a series of studies characterizing the use and effectiveness of technologies designed to assist drivers while backing. A major emphasis of this research has been on Rear Vision Camera (RVC) systems that provide drivers with an enhanced view of the area behind the vehicle. RVC systems are intended to aid in positioning the vehicle when executing low-speed parking and backing-related tasks and are not necessarily well suited for detecting unexpected in-path obstacles (particularly if the RVC image is not coupled with object detection alerts issued to the driver). This GM/VTTI research has addressed both the physical and design properties of the RVC image (e.g., optical distortion, quality and clarity of information, amount of information, display size and location, etc.) as well as driver behavioral and perceptual aspects related to RVC use (e.g., driver reliance, impacts on drivers' mirror sampling patterns, frequency of use, duration of glances, ability to accurately judge distances, potential unintended consequences). This paper outlines the complex set of performance-shaping factors found to play a role in moderating the use of RVC systems and unexpected obstacle detection/avoidance performance, including user experience, display location, and driving scenario.
CitationLlaneras, R., Neurauter, M., and Green, C., "Factors Moderating the Effectiveness of Rear Vision Systems: What Performance-Shaping Factors Contribute to Drivers' Detection and Response to Unexpected In-Path Obstacles When Backing?," SAE Technical Paper 2011-01-0549, 2011, https://doi.org/10.4271/2011-01-0549.
- Mazzae, E.N., Barickman, F., Baldwin, S., and Ranney, T. (2008). On-Road Study of Drivers' Use of Rearview Video System (ORSDURVS). Report No. DOT HS 811 024, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration: Washington, DC
- Perez, M., Angell, L.S., Hankey, J., Deering, R.K., Llaneras, R. E., Green, C.A., Neurauter, M.L., and Antin, J.F. (2009). Advanced Crash Avoidance Technologies (ACAT) Program - Final Report of the GM-VTTI Backing-Crash Countermeasures. NHTSA, report number TBD
- Llaneras, R.E., Neurauter, L., and Green, C.A. (2008). Relative Performance of a Rear View Under Mirror and Several Rear View Camera Executions as a Parking Aid and Obstacle Detection System. Unpublished Technical Report.
- Llaneras, R.E., Neurauter, L., Doerzaph, Z., and Green, C. A. (2006). Virtual Bumper System Driver Evaluation Study. Unpublished Technical Report.
- Lee, S., Hankey, J.M., and Green, C.A. (2003). Backing Assist. Unpublished Technical Report
- Llaneras, R.E., Neurauter, L., and Kiefer, R.J. (2009). Evaluation of a Pedestrian Warning System for Backing Situations. Unpublished Technical Report.
- McLaughlin, S.B., Hankey, J.M., Green, C.A., and Kiefer, R.J. (2001). Driver Performance Evaluation of Two Rear Parking Aids. SAE paper number 522.