This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Accurate Reproduction of Wind-Tunnel Results with CFD
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 12, 2011 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Aerodynamic simulation results are most of the time compared to wind tunnel results. It is too often simplistically believed that it suffice to take the CAD geometry of a car, prepare and run a CFD simulation to obtain results that should be comparable. With the industry requesting accuracies of a few drag counts when comparing CFD to wind tunnel results, a careful analysis of the element susceptible of creating a difference in the results is in order.
In this project a detailed 1:4 scale model of the Hyundai Genesis was tested in the model wind tunnel of the FKFS. Five different underbody panel configurations of the car were tested going from a fully paneled car to a car without panels. The impact of the moving versus static ground was also tested, providing over all ten different experimental results for this car model. These ten different configurations were simulated having in mind to reproduce the testing condition in every possible aspect to be able to truly evaluate the accuracy of the CFD results. In the setup process, three aspects were considered: geometry precision, wind-tunnel environment and conditions and finally evaluation of the proper reference values.
In the geometry preparation process an additional step was added to morph the geometry prepared from the CAD model. The target used was scanned data obtained from the physical model after the test session. The wind tunnel environment was reproduced in the setup to include all side effects (pressure gradient, jet expansion, etc.) and boundary conditions found in the FKFS scale model wind tunnel during the testing session. When reproducing wind tunnel environment in a simulation it is necessary to evaluate the proper values of dynamic pressure and static pressure needed to non-dimensionalize the results. A new method was used to evaluate the proper reference values. The empty wind-tunnel method was also used and results are compared to the new method.
This paper shows that it is possible to achieve very accurate CFD results using PowerFLOW if all aspects of the testing condition are systematically reproduced in the simulation setup.
|Technical Paper||CFD Investigations of Wind Tunnel Interference Effects|
|Technical Paper||CFD Validation Study for a Sedan Scale Model in an Open Jet Wind Tunnel|
|Technical Paper||Morphing and Parametrization Technologies for CFD Applications|
CitationCyr, S., Ih, K., and Park, S., "Accurate Reproduction of Wind-Tunnel Results with CFD," SAE Technical Paper 2011-01-0158, 2011, https://doi.org/10.4271/2011-01-0158.
- Mercker, E. Wiedemann, J. “On the Correction of Interference Effects in an Open Jet Wind-Tunnels,” SAE Technical Paper 960671 1996 10.4271/960671
- Mercker, E. Wickern, G. Wiedemann, J. “Contemplation of Nozzle Blockage in Open Jet Wind-Tunnels in View of Different “Q” Determination Techniques,” SAE Technical Paper 970136 1997 10.4271/970136
- Wickern, G. “On the Application of Classical Wind Tunnel Corrections for Automotive Bodies,” SAE Technical Paper 2001-01-0633 2001 10.4271/2001-01-0633
- Fischer, O. Kuthada, T. Widdecke, N. Wiedemann, J. “CFD Investigation of Wind Tunnel Interference Effects,” SAE Technical Paper 2007-01-1045 2007 10.4271/2007-01-1045
- Fischer, O. Kuthada, T. Wiedemann, J. CFD Validation Project on Vehicle Scale Models under the Constraint of an Open Jet Wind Tunnel EUROMECH Colloquium 509 Vehicle Aerodynamics Berlin 2009
- Fischer, O. Kuthada, T. Mercker, E. Wiedemann, J. et al. “CFD Approach to Evaluate Wind-Tunnel and Model Setup Effects on Aerodynamic Drag and Lift for Detailed Vehicles,” SAE Technical Paper 2010-01-0760 2010 10.4271/2010-01-0760
- Wiedemann, J. Potthoff, J. “The New 5-Belt Road Simulation System of the IVK Wind Tunnels - Design and First Results,” SAE Technical Paper 2003-01-0429 2003 10.4271/2003-01-0429
- Wickern, G. Dietz, S. Luehrmann, L. “Gradients Effects on Drag Due to Boundary-Layer Suction in Automotive Wind Tunnels,” SAE Technical Paper 2003-01-0655 2003 10.4271/2003-01-0655
- Lietz, R. Mallick, S. Kandasamy, S. Chen, H. “Exterior Airflow Simulations Using a Lattice Boltzmann Approach,” SAE Technical Paper 2002-01-0596 2002 10.4271/2002-01-0596
- Bartelheimer, W. Berechnung der Fahrzeugum-strömung bei BMW: Validierung und Einsatz von Exa PowerFLOW, Tagung “Fahrzeug-Aerodynamik” Haus der Technik München 2001
- Parpais, S. Farce, J. Bailly, O. Genty, H. A Comparison of Experimental Investigations and Numerical Simulations around Two-box Form Models MIRA, 4 th Int. Conference of Vehicle Aerodynamics Warwick 2002
- Mallick, S. Remondi, S. Chen, H. Pervaiz, M. Devloping CFD through Validation of Turbulence Models MIRA, 3 rd Int. Conference of Vehicle Aerodynamics Warwick 2000
- Fischer, O. Kuthada, T. Wiedemann, J. Dethioux, P. et al. “CFD Validation Study for a Sedan Scale Model in an Open Jet Wind Tunnel,” SAE Technical Paper 2008-01-0325 2008 10.4271/2008-01-0325