This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
ISO Headform Pedestrian Protection test results comparison at critical bonnet regions
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published October 06, 2010 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Test Protocols for pedestrian head protection in a car pedestrian accident have been discussed for several Technical Communities in order to identify ideal boundary test conditions to evaluate injury limits. With the purpose to harmonize with final Global Technical Regulation 9 for Pedestrian Protection published by ECE in January 2009, European New Car Assessment Program (ENCAP) has changed their Child and Adult headform weight and geometry boundary test conditions. However 5 Kph remains as difference between both protocols. This work presents a comparative head impact test analysis for both headform at ENCAP and GTR#9 boundary test conditions when performed at critical bonnet regions.
CitationPereira, N., "ISO Headform Pedestrian Protection test results comparison at critical bonnet regions," SAE Technical Paper 2010-36-0236, 2010, https://doi.org/10.4271/2010-36-0236.
- Global Technical Regulation 9 26 January 2009
- International Road Traffic and Accident Database (IRTAD) www.bast.de/htdocs/fachthemen/irtad
- The Abbreviated injury Scale - 1990 revision
- NHTSA “Final Economic Assessment FMVSS No. 201, Upper Interior Head Protection” June 1995
- Prasad, P. Mertz, H.J. “The Position of the United States Delegation to the ISO Working Group 6 on the Use of HIC in the Automotive Environment,” SAE Technical Paper 851246 1985 10.4271/851246
- ENCAP Assessment Protocol Pedestrian Protection, V5.0 May 2009
- ENCAP Pedestrian Test Protocol, V5.1 January 2010