Try Mobilus Beta
Search tips
 This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.

Achieving an 80% GHG Reduction by 2050 in California's Passenger Vehicle Fleet: Implications for the ZEV Regulation

Journal Article
2010-01-2306
ISSN: 1946-4614, e-ISSN: 1946-4622
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4271/2010-01-2306
Published October 19, 2010 by SAE International in United States
Achieving an 80% GHG Reduction by 2050 in California's Passenger Vehicle Fleet: Implications for the ZEV Regulation
Sector:
Citation: Cunningham, J., "Achieving an 80% GHG Reduction by 2050 in California's Passenger Vehicle Fleet: Implications for the ZEV Regulation," SAE Int. J. Passeng. Cars - Electron. Electr. Syst. 3(2):19-36, 2010, https://doi.org/10.4271/2010-01-2306.
Language: English

References

  1. Yang, C. McCollum, D. McCarthy, R. Leighty, W. “Meeting an 80% in GHG Emissions from Transportation in 2050: A Case Study in California,” Transportation Research Part D 14 2009
  2. Mui, S Alson, J. Ellies, B. Ganss, D. “A Wedge Analysis of the US Transportation Sector,” U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 2007
  3. Gielen, D. “Energy Technology Perspectives: Scenarios & Strategies to 2050,” International Energy Agency 2008
  4. Cheah, L. Evans, L. Bandivadekar, A. Heywood, J. “Factor of Two: Halving the Fuel Consumption of New US Automobiles by 2035,” Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2007
  5. Heywood, J. et al “On the Road in 2035: Reducing Transportation's Petroleum Consumption and GHG Emissions,” Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2008
  6. McKinsey & Company “Roads toward a low carbon future: reducing CO2 emissions from passenger vehicles in the global road transportation system,” McKinsey & Company, Inc. 2009
  7. Greene, D. Schafer, A. “Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from US Transportation,” Pew Center on Global Climate Change 2003
  8. Pacala, S. Socolow, R. “Stabilizing Wedges: Solving the Climate Problem for the Next 50 Years with Current Technologies,” Princeton University, Science Magazine 305 2004
  9. Ramage, M. et al “Transitions to Alternative Transportation Technologies: A Focus on Hydrogen,” Committee on Assessment of Resource Needs for Fuel Cell & Hydrogen Technologies National Research Council 2008
  10. Greene, D. Leiby, P. Bowman, D. “Integrated Analysis of Market Transformation Scenarios with HyTrans,” U.S. Department of Energy 2007
  11. Air Resources Board “Proposed regulation to implement the Low Carbon Fuel Standard: Initial Statement of Reasons,” California Air Resources Board 2009
  12. Parker, N. et al “Strategic Assessment of Bioenergy Development in the West: Spatial Analysis and Supply Curve Development,” Final Report to the Western Governors Association (WGA) University of California Davis 2008
  13. Perkack, R. et al “Biomass as Feedstock for a Bioenergy and Bioproducts Industry: The Technical Feasibility of a Billion-Ton Annual Supply,” U.S. Department of Energy and U.S. Department of Agriculture 2005
  14. Haug, M. et al “Biofuels for Transport: An International Perspective,” International Energy Agency 2004
  15. Jenkins, B. et al “A Roadmap for the development of biomass in California,” University of California Davis 2006
  16. Williams, R. et al “An assessment of biomass resources in California, 2007,” University of California Davis 2008
  17. Ramage, M. et al “Liquid Transportation Fuels from Coal and Biomass Technological Status, Costs, and Environmental Impacts,” America's Energy Future Panel on Alternative Liquid Transportation Fuels National Research Council 2009
  18. IEA “World Energy Outlook 2008,” International Energy Agency 2008
  19. Air Resources Board “Complementary Policies,” Attachment C to the ZEV Regulation White Paper California Air Resources Board 2009
  20. Joseck, F. “Well to Wheel Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Petroleum Use,” U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen Program Record #9002 2009
  21. Elgowainy, A. et al “Well to wheels energy use and GHG emissions analysis of PHEVs,” U.S. Department of Energy 2009
  22. Samaras, C. Meisterling, K. “Lifecycle Assessment of GHG Emissions from PHEVs: Implications for Policy,” Environmental Science and Technology Carnegie Mellon University 2007
  23. Crosby, M. “Light-Duty Vehicle Electrification in California: Potential Barriers and Opportunities,” Staff White Paper California Public Utilities Commission 2009
  24. Williams, E. “Plug-in and Regular Hybrids: A National and Regional Comparison of Costs and CO2 Emissions,” Climate Change Policy Partnership Duke University 2008
  25. Conti, J. “International Energy Outlook 2009,” Energy Information Administration 2009
  26. James, R. Richels, R. Blanford, G. Gehl, S. “The power to reduce CO2 emissions: The full portfolio,” Discussion Paper Electric Power Research Institute 2007
  27. Kromer, M. Heywood, J. “Electric Powertrains: Opportunities and Challenges in the US LDV Fleet,” Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2007
  28. Bernstein, L. “Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report,” International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) United Nations 2007
  29. Lutsey, N. “Prioritizing Climate Change Mitigation Alternatives: Comparing Transportation Technologies to Options in Other Sectors,” Transportation Technology & Policy University of California Davis 2008

Cited By

Recommended Content

Technical Paper Greenhouse Gas Emissions: A Systems Analysis Approach
Technical Paper Speciation and Calculated Reactivity of Automotive Exhaust Emissions and Their Relation to Fuel Properties - Auto/Oil Air Quality Improvement Research Program
Technical Paper The Effect of Aromatics, MTBE, Olefins and T90 on Mass Exhaust Emissions from Current and Older Vehicles - The Auto/Oil Air Quality Improvement Research Program