This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Automatic Geometry Optimization of Exhaust Systems Based on Sensitivities Computed by a Continuous Adjoint CFD Method in OpenFOAM
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 12, 2010 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Meeting backpressure and flow uniformity requirements within severe packaging constraints presents a particular challenge in the layout of catalyst inlet cones. In these cases, a parameterized optimization of the potentially complex cone geometries is inefficient (and inappropriate). Even assuming that a parameterization of the complex surface forms is possible, the choice of parametric shapes invariably affects the achievable results. Additionally, the long computation time for solving the flow fields limits the number of shape parameters that can be considered.
To overcome these restrictions, an optimization tool has been developed at EMCON Technologies that is based on the continuous adjoint method (augmented Lagrange method) of Othmer et al. The open source CFD toolbox OpenFOAM® is used as the platform for the implementation. Since the geometry itself is modeled using an immersed boundary method (in which finite volume cells are marked as fluid or solid), no geometry parameterization is required. The method allows computation of the sensitivity of flow uniformity and energy dissipation (or other target quantities) based on the instantaneous geometry. After the calculated surface sensitivities are combined and corrected for manufacturing and topological constraints, the location of the immersed boundary is automatically adjusted. It is thus possible to automatically determine a feasible catalyst cone geometry starting from an amorphous box (representing the packaging constraints) that is supplemented by definitions of inflow boundaries (for the flow coming from different manifold runners) and the outflow boundary (the catalyst surface). The calculation time associated with the process is on the same order of magnitude as the solution of the RANS equations itself. The optimization tool, its theoretical basis and some practical results are presented in the paper.
|Technical Paper||Catalyst Light-off Evaluation Using CFD Simulation of the Exhaust Manifold|
|Technical Paper||Study of a Two-Degree-of-Freedom Exhaust System|
|Technical Paper||Experimental Approach to Optimize Catalyst Flow Uniformity|
CitationHinterberger, C. and Olesen, M., "Automatic Geometry Optimization of Exhaust Systems Based on Sensitivities Computed by a Continuous Adjoint CFD Method in OpenFOAM," SAE Technical Paper 2010-01-1278, 2010, https://doi.org/10.4271/2010-01-1278.
- Othmer C., de Villiers E. and Weller H. G., “Implementation of a continuous adjoint for topology optimization of ducted flows”, AIAA-2007-3947.
- Othmer C., “A continuous adjoint formulation for the computation of topological and surface sensitivities of ducted flows”, Int. J. Num. Meth. Fluids 58: 862-877, 2008, doi:10.1002/fld.1770.
- Weller H. G., Tabor G., Jasak H., Fureby C., “A Tensorial Approach to Computational Continuum Mechanics using Object Orientated Techniques”, Computers in Physics 12(6):620-631, 1998 doi:10.1063/1.168744.
- Jones W. P. und Launder B. E., “The prediction of laminarization with a two-equation model of turbulence”, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 15:301-314, 1972, doi:10.1016/0017-9310(72)90076-2.
- Spalding D. B., “Calculation of turbulent heat transfer in cluttered spaces”, Proc. 10th Int. Heat Transfer Conference, Brighton, UK, 1994.
- Othmer C., Kaminski T., Giering R., “Computation of topological sensitivities in fluid dynamics: cost function versatility”, ECCOMAS CFD 2006, Delft.