This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Development of Leak Tightness Specifications for Automotive Fuel System Components as Required to meet Hydrocarbon Emission Regulations using the Equivalent Channel Concept and its Implementation Method for Production Leak Testing
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 12, 2010 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Determination of appropriate leak tightness specifications for production leak testing of fuel system components has challenged the automotive industry for many years. This process has become more complicated as hydrocarbon emission regulations have been lowered (US-EPA, CARB LEVII, Euro5, etc.). Application of the equivalent channel (EC) concept can significantly simplify the process of determining leak tightness specifications.
This paper describes the test procedure and results of a hydrocarbon emission study designed to define a critical geometry (known as Equivalent Channel-EC) that will plug after exposure to gasoline, resulting in no HC emission due to leaks during Vehicle SHED (Sealed Housing for Evaporative Determination) tests. This critical geometry will stop any measurable hydrocarbon leakage after enough time has elapsed for the channel to plug. Micro-channels of several diameters and lengths were tested in a Micro-SHED at 40 degrees Celsius for 24 hours. SHED tests were performed on EC's with direct liquid gasoline contact at 345 kPa-Gage (50 psig). These test parameters were selected to match typical automotive operating conditions of gasoline fuel system components. Gasoline used was per EPA Tier 2 EEE specification as required for standard emission tests.
Nitrogen and flow rates of all micro-channels were measured to establish minimum production leak test tightness specifications required to ensure defects larger than the critical geometry (Equivalent Channel) are detected during a leak test. EC flow rates were measured at several pressures to facilitate establishing a flow curve. The flow curves can be used to calculate flow rate at any test pressure between 68.9 and 1034.2 kPa-Gage (10 and 150 psig).
This method of establishing leak tightness specifications effectively ensures no hydrocarbon Vehicle SHED contribution due to component leaks as is independent of specific production leak test methods and test parameters.
CitationBishop, L. and Sagi, H., "Development of Leak Tightness Specifications for Automotive Fuel System Components as Required to meet Hydrocarbon Emission Regulations using the Equivalent Channel Concept and its Implementation Method for Production Leak Testing," SAE Technical Paper 2010-01-1104, 2010, https://doi.org/10.4271/2010-01-1104.
- Harrigan M.J. “Fuel System Components /Module Leak Tightness Specification No.: ES YU5A-9000AC” Ford Motors Company Standard April 2006
- ASTM “Standard Terminology for Nondestructive Examinations” January 01 2007
- Burrel et al. “Development of Dye Ingress Method to Assess Container Closure Integrity: Correlation to Microbial Ingress” PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science & Technology 54 6 November/December 2000
- Gorti, V. Sagi, H. “Simplifying the Approach to Specify and Measure Product Seal Integrity and Leak Tightness,” SAE Technical Paper 2006-01-0379 2006
- Gennes Brochard-Wyatt Quere “Capillarity and Wetting Phenomena” Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2004
- Giles, M.T. Sattleberg, M.S. “Performance of a Fixed Volume Open-Loop Mini SHED System for Evaporative Emissions Testing,” SAE Technical Paper 2003-01-3156 2003
- SAE International Surface Vehicle Recommended Practice “Optimized Fuel Tank Sender Closure,” SAE Standard J2587 Oct. 2005