This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Frontal Crash Testing and Vehicle Safety Designs: A Historical Perspective Based on Crash Test Studies
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 12, 2010 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
This study tracks vehicle design changes and frontal crash test performance in NHTSA's NCAP and IIHS consumer information tests since the mid-90s for the Honda Accord and Toyota Camry. The objective was to provide insights into how passenger cars have changed in response to frontal consumer information tests. The history of major design changes for each model was researched and documented. The occupant injury measures from both NHTSA and IIHS were computed and the ratings compiled for several generations of both vehicles.
Changes in vehicle crash pulse and occupant injury measures from both NCAP and IIHS tests, and from Canadian low speed rigid barrier tests, when available, were used to assess driver frontal protection for various vehicle generations. Loading of the rigid barrier in NCAP tests was used to evaluate front end stiffness changes over the years. Overall, results indicate that the consumer testing programs have induced many improvements in both the Camry and Accord vehicle structures, and restraint systems technologies. Front end stiffness increased with the first Camry platform change after the introduction of the IIHS test as contrasted with a decrease in the front end stiffness for the Accord. Overall, advances in restraint technologies, specifically seat belt load limiters, seemed to permit the resulting higher acceleration to be accommodated at the NCAP and IIHS test conditions. The Camry, in contrast to the Accord, appeared to be more optimized for the NCAP test condition, where it recorded an increase in the risk of chest injury and possibly head injury in crashes with a smaller occupant size and at a lower speed than the current NCAP and IIHS test speeds.
CitationSamaha, R., Digges, K., Fesich, T., and Authaler, M., "Frontal Crash Testing and Vehicle Safety Designs: A Historical Perspective Based on Crash Test Studies," SAE Technical Paper 2010-01-1024, 2010, https://doi.org/10.4271/2010-01-1024.
Safety Test Methodology and Structural Crashworthiness and Occupant Safety, 2010
Number: SP-2271; Published: 2010-04-13
Number: SP-2271; Published: 2010-04-13
- Park, B.T. Hackney, J.R. Morgan, R.M. Chan, H. et al. “The New Car Assessment Program: Has It Led to Stiffer Light Trucks and Vans Over the Years?” SAE Technical Paper 1999-01-0064 1999
- Swanson, J. Rockwell T. Beuse, N. Park, B. Summers S. Summers, L. “Evaluation of stiffness measures from the US New Car Assessment Program,” Proceedings of the 18th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV), Paper No. 527-O 2003
- Digges, K. Sahraei, E. Samaha, R. “Opportunities for Improved Rear Seat Child Safety,” Protection of Children in Cars, 7th International Conference December 2009 Munich, Germany
- Nolan, J. Lund, A. “Frontal Offset Deformable Barrier Crash Testing and Its Effect On Vehicle Stiffness,” Proceedings of the 17th ESV, Paper No. 487 2001
- Digges, K. Dalmotas, D. “Benefits of a Low Severity Frontal Crash Test,” 51st Annual Proceedings of AAAM 2007 51 299 317
- http://www.nhtsa.gov/ September 2009
- http://techdata.iihs.org/ September 2009
- www.safercar.gov September 2009
- IIHS Offset Barrier Test Protocol http://www.iihs.org/ratings/protocols/pdf/test_protocol_high.pdf September 2009
- Manary, M.A. Reed, M.P. Flannagan, C.A.C. Schneider, L.W. “ATD Positioning Based on Driver Posture and Position,” SAE Technical Paper 983163 1998
- SAE International Surface Vehicle Recommended Practice “Instrumentation for Impact Test - Part 1 - Electronic Instrumentation,” SAE Standard J211-1 July 2007
- Toyota “50th Anniversary of Toyota, Product History - Camry,” http://www.toyota.com September 2009
- Toyota Vehicles “Toyota Passenger Car Chronology,” http://pressroom.toyota.com September 2009
- Automotive News “3rd Generation Camry Took Toyota to a New Level in '92” Maskerey, M. A. October 2007
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camry December 2007
- Edmunds INSIDE LINE “Toyota, Generations” DiPietro, J http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/Features/articleId=46002 September 2009
- Foret-Bruno, J.-Y. Trosseille, X. Page, Y. Huère. J.-H. et al. “Comparison of Thoracic Injury Risk in Frontal Car Crashes for Occupant Restrained without Belt Load Limiters and Those Restrained with 6 kN and 4 kN Belt Load Limiters,” SAE Technical Paper 2001-22-0009 2001
- Laituri, T.R. Prasad, P. Kachnowski, B.P. Sullivan, K. et al. “Predictions of AIS3+ Thoracic Risks for Belted Occupants and Full-Engagement, Real-World Frontal Impacts: Sensitivity to Various Theoretical Risk Curves,” SAE Technical Paper 2003-01-1355 2003
- www.candiandriver.com November 2007
- http://www.tc.gc.ca/en/menu.htm November 2007
- Honda, Press and Media Center http://corporate.honda.com/press/list.aspx November 2007
- Walz, M. “NCAP Test Improvements with Pretensioners and Load Limiters “Traffic Injury Prevention,” 5 18 25 2004