This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Effect of Seat Belt Anchor Placement on Occupant Protection in Rollover with Consideration Given to Frontal Impact
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 12, 2010 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
A modeling study was conducted to explore the potential for reducing rollover occupant injury via seat belt geometry modifications and the effect such modifications would have on frontal impact protection. MADYMO software was used to model the first roof-to-ground strike of a dolly rollover crash test as well as a frontal impact test using a facet-style human driver occupant in a sport utility vehicle. The objective of this study was to learn whether occupant protection could be improved for rollover without reducing occupant protection in frontal impact. The models were validated using crash test results. Seat belt anchor locations were independently varied in the models to examine the effects of shortening the length or increasing the angle of the lap belt, shortening the torso belt, or lowering the D-ring. Several combinations of the most promising independent anchor relocations were investigated first in near-side and far-side rollover and then in frontal impact. Time histories of head excursion, head impact velocity, and chest acceleration were considered in assessing injury potential.
For the occupant size and seating position examined and for the vehicle dynamics used, two anchor relocation combinations were found to potentially have a favorable effect on occupant protection: a.) reducing the lap belt length and b.) reducing the lap belt length and the shoulder belt length. Lowering the D-ring was found to reduce protection of the far-side rollover occupant who has slipped from the torso belt, because the opportunity for him to re-enter the torso belt is diminished. In addition, it was observed in general that if the occupant's head contacts the roof during the rollover, it tends to do so before the head-roof contact patch contacts the ground. Consequently, the key determinant of head-“ground” contact velocity is then the vehicle dynamics, and modifications to the seat belt contribute to protection only by varying the placement of the head-roof contact.
It should be noted that for the rollover scenario explored, the primary roof-ground interaction was with the near-side roof rail. The conclusions reached in this study should not be assumed to apply to a rollover scenario in which the far-side roof rail has a hard impact with the ground.
CitationCurzon, A., Cooper, E., and Hinrichs, R., "Effect of Seat Belt Anchor Placement on Occupant Protection in Rollover with Consideration Given to Frontal Impact," SAE Technical Paper 2010-01-0524, 2010, https://doi.org/10.4271/2010-01-0524.
- Atkinson, T. Cooper, J. Patel, B. Atkinson, P. “Considerations for Rollover Simulation,” SAE Technical Paper 2004-01-0328 2004
- Orlowski, K.F. Bundorf, R.T. Moffatt, E.A. “Rollover Crash Tests - The Influence of Roof Strength on Injury Mechanics,” SAE Technical Paper 851734 1985
- Bahling, G.S. Bundorf, R.T. Kaspzyk, G.S. Moffatt, E.A. et al. “Rollover and Drop Tests - The Influence of Roof Strength on Injury Mechanics Using Belted Dummies,” SAE Technical Paper 902314 1990
- Parenteau, C. Gopal, M. Viano, D. “Near and Far-Side Adult Front Passenger Kinematics in a Vehicle Rollover,” SAE Technical Paper 2001-01-0176 2001
- Moffatt, E.A. Cooper, E.R. Croteau, J.J. Parenteau, C. et al. “Head Excursion of Seat Belted Cadaver, Volunteers and Hybrid III ATD in a Dynamic/Static Rollover Fixture,” SAE Technical Paper 973347 1997
- Arndt, M.W. Mowry, G.A. Dickerson, C.P. Arndt, S.M. “Evaluation of Experimental Restraints in Rollover Conditions,” SAE Technical Paper 952712 1995
- Pywell, J.F. Rouhana, S.W. McCleary, J.D. DeSaele, K.H. “Characterization of Belt Restraint Systems in Quasistatic Vehicle Rollover Tests,” SAE Technical Paper 973334 1997
- Meyer, S.E. Davis, M. Chng, D. Herbst, B. et al. “Three-Point Restraint System Design Considerations for Reducing Vertical Occupant Excursion in Rollover Experiments,” SAE Technical Paper 2000-01-0605 2000
- Moffatt, E. Hare, B. Lewis, L. Iiyama, H. Curzon, A. Cooper, E. “Head Excursion of Restrained Human Volunteers and Hybrid III Dummies in Steady State Rollover Tests,” 47th Annual Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine Barrington, IL 445 465 2003
- Smith, J.A. Rizer, A.L. Obergefell, L.A. “Predictive Simulation of Restrained Occupant Dynamics in Vehicle Rollovers,” SAE Technical Paper 930887 1993
- Ridella, S.A. Nayef, A. Altamore, P.F. “Rollover: A Methodology for Restraint System Development,” 2003 Experimental Safety Vehicle Conference Nagoya, Japan http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/departments/nrd-01/esv/18th/esv18th.htm 2003
- Fu, Y. Zhou, R. Kang, S. Lakshminarayan, V. Cheng, J. “Optimal Design of Vehicle Target Pulse and Restraint System,” 2003 MADYMO User's Meeting of the Americas http://www.automotive.tno.nl/smartsite.dws?id=626 2003
- James, M.B. Alsop, D.L. Nordhagen, R.P. Decker, R.L. “Injury Mechanisms and Field Accident Data Analysis in Rollover Accidents,” SAE Technical Paper 970396 1997