This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Fuel Consumption Tests for Evaluating the Accuracy and Precision of Truck Engine Electronic Control Modules to Capture Fuel Data
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published May 13, 2009 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Many trucking fleets and organizations are extensively using truck onboard computers (OBC) to gather fuel consumption data from truck engines' Electronic Control Modules (ECM). This study aimed to assess the accuracy and the precision of truck engine control module concerning the fuel consumption data.
The testing methodology evaluated the fuel consumption data provided by the ECM using test track and road fuel consumption tests, short-term operational observation, long-term operational observation and engine dynamometer tests. ECM data were retrieved using either onboard computers (OBC) or engine scan tools. Test track and road tests were mainly intended to evaluate the precision of ECM data for short distances, between 60 and 100 km. More than 220 test runs totalizing 22,000 km were conducted using 23 test vehicles. Short-term operational observation monitored a total of 77 vehicles on 305,000 km and long-term operational observation considered periods between 16 and 43 days, with total distance of 105,000 km
For short distances (less than 100 km), similar engines presented different levels of precision and accuracy. The majority of the tested vehicles showed acceptable precision but for some tests, the accuracy was unsatisfactory. Short-term and long-term operational observations showed satisfactory accuracy and precision. ECM data precision and accuracy vary among engine manufacturers and among engine models from a single manufacturer. ECM accuracy and precision are more reliable when averaging over longer periods or with a larger number of tests or trips. Therefore, it is risky to use ECM fuel data alone for evaluating the impact of a technology or practice. ECM data should always be completed with other available information, such as fleet fuel records. ECM fuel data might be used for long-term operational observations when expected fuel improvements are at least 5%.
CitationSurcel, M. and Michaelsen, J., "Fuel Consumption Tests for Evaluating the Accuracy and Precision of Truck Engine Electronic Control Modules to Capture Fuel Data," SAE Technical Paper 2009-01-1605, 2009, https://doi.org/10.4271/2009-01-1605.
- Bridgestone Firestone North American Tire LLC, “Is that the best way to measure it?”, Real Answers, Volume 12, Issue 2, 2007.
- Technology & Maintenance Council, TMC's 2006-07 Recommended Practices Manual, “RP 344, Understanding Engine ECM Data”, 2006.
- SAE International, “Joint TMC/SAE Fuel Consumption Test Procedure - Type II”, SAE Surface Vehicle Recommended Practice J1321, Warrendale, PA, USA, 1986.
- FPInnovations - Feric Division, “Long-term Operational Observation Handbook”, Montreal, Canada, 2008.
- Technology & Maintenance Council, TMC's 2006-07 Recommended Practices Manual, “RP 1109, Type IV Fuel Economy Test Procedure”, 2006.
- FPInnovations - Feric Division, “Diesel Engine Dynamometer Fuel Consumption Test Handbook”, Montreal, Canada, 2007.
- SAE International, “Procedure for Mapping Performance - Spark Ignition and Compression Ignition Engine”, SAE Surface Vehicle Recommended Practice J1312,. Warrendale, PA, USA, 1995.
- SAE International, “Engine Power Test Code - Spark Ignition and Compression Ignition - Net Power Rating”, SAE Surface Vehicle Recommended Practice J1349, Warrendale, PA, USA, 1995.
- Jokai, R., Duo, W., “The Impact of Bio-diesel / Diesel Blend Levels have on Engine Performance”, SAE 2008-01-2610, SAE Commercial Vehicle Engineering Congress and Exhibition. Chicago, IL, 2008.
- Corrsys Datron Sensorsysteme GmbH, “CDS-DFL-3 Fuel Flow Meter For Fuel Consumption Measurement in Mobile Vehicle Instrumentation User Manual”, Wetzlar, Germany, 2006.