This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Likelihood of Brain Injury in Motorcycle Accidents: A Comparison of Novelty and DOT-Approved Helmets
Technical Paper
2009-01-0248
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
During a motorcycle accident, a rider’s helmet may dissipate energy to reduce the likelihood of serious brain injury. Novelty helmets lack the energy-absorbing layer between the comfort liner and the outer shell of the helmet. In this study, we compared the injury mitigation capabilities and associated brain injury potential of novelty helmets to three US DOT-approved motorcycle helmets. The analysis was performed using a drop tower system. Helmeted Hybrid-III and magnesium head-forms were dropped onto a slab of asphalt with contact to the upper, back region of the helmets. The first drop height was chosen to simulate a fall from the typical seated height of a rider on a cruising style bike, and the second height was chosen to yield an impact speed that conformed to the DOT testing requirements, 6 meters per second (13.4 mph). Resultant accelerations, head injury criterion (HIC), and probability of an AIS 4+ brain injury were calculated for each drop test. For both drop heights tested, resultant accelerations and HIC scores for the novelty helmet were approximately four times larger than those calculated for the DOT-approved full-face helmet. Data revealed that in impacts representative of falling from a typical seated height onto asphalt, wearing a DOT-approved helmet could reduce the risk of AIS 4+ brain injuries from over 90% to less than 3%.
Recommended Content
Technical Paper | Development of Brain Injury Criteria (BrIC) |
Technical Paper | SIMon: A SIMULATED INJURY MONITOR; APPLICATION TO HEAD INJURY ASSESSMENT |
Citation
Scher, I., Harley, E., Richards, D., and Thomas, R., "Likelihood of Brain Injury in Motorcycle Accidents: A Comparison of Novelty and DOT-Approved Helmets," SAE Technical Paper 2009-01-0248, 2009, https://doi.org/10.4271/2009-01-0248.Also In
References
- Code of Federal Regulations 2006 Chapter V-National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Department of Transportation Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards
- 1983 Headforms for Use in the Testing of Protective Helmets
- Mertz H. 1985 Biofidelity of the Hybrid III Head SAE Paper No. 851245 , Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA
- Mertz H Irwin A Prasad I 2003 Biomechanical Scaling Bases for Frontal and Side Impact Injury Assessment Reference Values Proceedings of the 47 th Stapp Car Crash Conference, Society of Automotive Engineers #2003-22-0009
- Ouellet, J. V. Kasantikul, V. 2006 Motorcycle Helmet Effect on a Per-Crash Basis in Thailand and the United States Traffic Injury Prevention 7 49 54
- SAE 2003 Instrumentation for Impact Test—Part 1—Electronic Instrumentation SAE Handbook The Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, PA
- Turner, P. A. Hagelin, C. A. 2000 Novelty Helmet Use by Motorcycle Riders in Florida. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1734 69 76
- US Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Traffic Safety Facts Sept 2004
- US Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Traffic Safety Facts April 2007