Try Mobilus Beta
Search tips
 This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.

Handling and Braking Analyses of a Heavy Vehicle with a Cross-Axle Fluidically-Coupled Suspension

Journal Article
2008-01-2672
ISSN: 1946-391X, e-ISSN: 1946-3928
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4271/2008-01-2672
Published October 07, 2008 by SAE International in United States
Handling and Braking Analyses of a Heavy Vehicle with a Cross-Axle Fluidically-Coupled Suspension
Citation: Cao, D., Rakheja, S., and Su, C., "Handling and Braking Analyses of a Heavy Vehicle with a Cross-Axle Fluidically-Coupled Suspension," SAE Int. J. Commer. Veh. 1(1):406-415, 2009, https://doi.org/10.4271/2008-01-2672.
Language: English

References

  1. Ervin, R.D. 1986 ‘The dependence of truck roll stability on size and weight variables’ International Journal of Vehicle Design 7 192 208
  2. Winkler, C. 2000 ‘Rollover of heavy commercial vehicles’ UMTRI Research Review 31 The University of Michigan USA
  3. Cole, D.J. 2001 ‘Fundamental issues in suspension design for heavy road vehicles’ Vehicle System Dynamics 35 319 360
  4. Kang, X.D. 2001 ‘Optimal tank design and directional dynamic analysis of liquid cargo vehicles under steering and braking’ Concordia University Canada
  5. Dahlberg, E. 1999 ‘Yaw instability due to longitudinal load transfer during braking in a curve’ SAE paper 1999-01-2952
  6. Wong, J.Y. 2001 ‘Theory of ground vehicles’ 3rd John Wiley & Sons, Inc. USA
  7. Holen, P. Thorvald, B. 2004 ‘Possibilities and limitations with distributed damping in heavy vehicles’ Vehicle System Dynamics Supplement 41 172 181
  8. Sutton, T. Pope, R. Brandewie, K. Henry, J. 2001 ‘International truck and engine high performance vehicle driveability - ride and handling’ SAE paper 2001-01-2787
  9. Ledesma, R. 2002 ‘Ride performance comparison of trailer suspension systems using computational methods’ SAE paper 2002-01-3103
  10. Cao, D. Rakheja, S. Su, C.-Y. 2006 ‘A generalized model of a class of interconnected hydro-pneumatic suspensions and analysis of pitch properties’ Proc. of ASME Int. Mech. Engineering Congress, IMECE2006-13961 Chicago, USA
  11. Cao, D. Rakheja, S. Su, C.-Y. 2007 ‘Pitch Attitude Control and Braking Performance Analysis of Heavy Vehicles with Interconnected Suspensions’ SAE paper 2007-01-1347
  12. Abe, M. 1999 ‘Vehicle dynamics and control for improving handling and active safety: from fourwheel steering to direct yaw moment control’ Journal of Multi-Body Dynamics 213 87 101
  13. Pintado, P. Castell, M.-A. 1999 ‘Independent suspension, self steered axle, and 4ws for buses’ Vehicle System Dynamics 31 137 155
  14. Crolla, D.A. 1996 ‘Vehicle dynamics - theory into practice’ Journal of Automobile Engineering 210 83 94
  15. Gillespie, T.D. 1992 ‘Fundamentals of vehicle dynamics’ SAE Inc. PA, USA
  16. Joarder, M.N. 2003 ‘Influence of nonlinear asymmetric suspension properties on the ride characteristics of road vehicle’ Concordia University Canada
  17. Dixon, J.C. 1996 ‘Tires, suspension and handling’ 2nd SAE Inc. PA, USA
  18. Norman, I.A. Scharff, R. Corinchoc, J.A. 1995 ‘Heavy-duty truck systems’ 2nd Delmar Publishers USA
  19. Matschinsky, W. 1998 ‘Road vehicle suspensions’ Springer-Verlag Berlin Heideberg, Germany
  20. Dixon, J.C. 1999 ‘The shock absorber handbook’ SAE Inc. USA
  21. Cebon, D. 1999 ‘Handbook of vehicle-road interaction’ Swets & Zeitlinger the Netherlands
  22. Feury, M. Halle, N. Simon, G. Stinson, M. 2001 ‘Future heavy tactical truck’ SAE paper 2001-01-0889
  23. Giliomee, C.L. 2003 ‘Analysis of a Four State Switchable Hydro-Pneumatic Spring and Damper System’ University of Pretoria South Africa
  24. Gunter, D. Bylsma, W. Letherwood, M. Dennis, S. Argeropoulos, K. Teschendorf, D. Gorsich, D. 2005 ‘Using 3D multi-body simulation to evaluate future truck technologies’ SAE paper 2005-01-0934
  25. Felez, J. Vera, C. 1987 ‘Bond graph assisted models for hydro-pneumatic suspensions in crane vehicles’ Vehicle System Dynamics 16 313 332
  26. Crolla, D.A. Pitcher, R.H. Lines, J.A. 1987 ‘Active suspension control for an off-road vehicle’ Journal of Automobile Engineering 201 1 10
  27. Su, H. 1990 ‘An investigation of vibration isolation systems using active, semi-active and tunable passive mechanisms with applications to vehicle suspensions’ Concordia University Canada
  28. Liu, P. 1994 ‘An analytical study of ride and handling performance of an interconnected vehicle suspension’ Concordia University Canada
  29. Chaudhary, S. 1998 ‘Ride and roll performance analysis of a vehicle with spring loaded interconnected hydro-pneumatic suspension’ Concordia University Canada
  30. Wu, L. 2003 ‘Analysis of hydro-pneumatic interconnected suspension struts in the roll plane vehicle model’ Concordia University Canada
  31. Wilde, J.R. Heydinger G.J. Guenther, D.A. Mallin, T. Devenish, A.M. 2005 ‘Experimental evaluation of fishhook maneuver performance of a kinetic suspension system’ SAE paper 2005-01-0392
  32. Wilde, J.R. Heydinger, G.J. Guenther, D.A. 2006 ‘ADAMS simulation of ride and handling performance of kineticTM suspension system’ SAE paper 2006-01-1972
  33. Cao, D. Rakheja, S. Su, C.-Y. ‘Dynamic analyses of roll plane interconnected hydropneumatic suspension systems’ International Journal of Vehicle Design
  34. Bernard, J.E. Winkler, C.B. Fancher, P.S. 1973 ‘A computer based mathematical method for predicting the directional response of trucks and tractor-trailers’ UMTRI Technical Report UM-HSRI-PF-73-1 The University of Michigan USA
  35. Data, S. Frigerio, F. 2002 ‘Objective evaluation of handling quality’ Journal of Automobile Engineering 216 297 305
  36. Fancher, P.S. 1995 ‘Generic data for representing truck tire characteristics in simulations of braking and braking-in-a-turn maneuvers’ UMTRI Report 95-34 The University of Michigan USA
  37. Fancher, P.S. Ervin, R.D. Winkler, C.B. Gillespie, T.D. 1986 ‘A factbook of the mechanical properties of the components for single-unit and articulated heavy trucks’ UMTRI Report UMTRI-86-12 The University of Michigan USA
  38. Cao, D. Rakheja, S. Su, C. “Property Analysis of an X-coupled Suspension for Sport Utility Vehicles” SAE Int. J. Passeng. Cars - Mech. Syst 1 1 853 862 2008
  39. Shim, T. Ghike, C. 2007 ‘Understanding the limitations of different vehicle models for roll dynamics studies’ Vehicle System Dynamics 45 191 216
  40. Klasson, J. 2002 ‘A generalized crosswind model for vehicle simulation purposes Vehicle System Dynamics Supplement 37 350 359
  41. Pacejka, H.B. Bakker, E. 1991 ‘The magic formula tyre model’ Proc. of 1st Tyre Colloquium Delft The Netherland
  42. Cao, D. 2008 ‘Theoretical analyses of roll- and pitch-coupled hydro-pneumatic strut suspensions’ Concordia University Canada

Cited By

Recommended Content

Technical Paper Modeling and Model Analysis of a Full-Car Fitted with an Anti-Pitch Anti-Roll Hydraulically Interconnected Suspension
Journal Article Property Analysis of an X-Coupled Suspension for Sport Utility Vehicles
Technical Paper Study of Pneumatic Rubber Valves Degradation by Formation of Esters in “Fresh” and “Used” Lubricating Oil