This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Investigation of a Trailer Underbody Fairing for Heavy Vehicle Aerodynamic Drag Reduction
Technical Paper
2008-01-2601
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
The drag reduction capability of a trailer underbody fairing is investigated using steady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes simulations of a full-scale heavy vehicle traveling at highway speed within a crosswind. The flow field about the vehicle is modeled for two different fairing designs of varying length that yield reductions in the drag coefficient ranging from 0.013 to 0.042. Analysis of the trailer underbody flow field indicates that the fairings decrease the size of a recirculation zone that exists immediately downstream of the tractor drive wheels by providing a surface to which the separated underbody flow can reattach. A comparison of the pressure coefficients across the surface of the fairings demonstrates that the longer fairings produce greater pressure coefficients, hence resulting in a larger reduction in drag than the shorter fairings. One of the fairings is shown to outperform traditional trailer side skirts, which yield a reduction in the drag coefficient of 0.035. The results of this investigation indicate that the fairing may be a viable add-on device for mitigating trailer underbody drag, while providing ground clearances greater than that of trailer side skirts.
Recommended Content
Authors
Citation
Ortega, J. and Salari, K., "Investigation of a Trailer Underbody Fairing for Heavy Vehicle Aerodynamic Drag Reduction," SAE Technical Paper 2008-01-2601, 2008, https://doi.org/10.4271/2008-01-2601.Also In
Aerodynamics and Fuel Economy ~ Aerodynamic Devices and Methods & Technologies
Number: SP-2219; Published: 2008-10-07
Number: SP-2219; Published: 2008-10-07
References
- Cooper, K. R. “Commercial Vehicle Aerodynamic Drag Reduction: Historical Perspective as a Guide,” The Aerodynamics of Heavy Vehicles: Trucks, Buses, and Trains McCallen, R. Browand, F. Ross, J. Lecture Notes in Applied and Computational Mechanics 19 2004 9 28
- Cooper, K. R. “Truck Aerodynamics Reborn - Lessons from the Past,” SAE 2003-01-3376 , SAE International Truck and Bus Meeting and Exhibition November 10–12 2003
- Schoon, R. E. “On-Road Evaluation of Devices to Reduce Heavy Truck Aerodynamic Drag,” SAE 2007-01-4294 2007
- www.turbosquid.com 2006
- www.freightlinertrucks.com/trucks/find-by-model/columbia/ 2007
- Leuschen, J Cooper, K. R. “Full-Scale Wind Tunnel Tests of Production and Prototype, Second-Generation Aerodynamic Drag-Reducing Devices for Tractor-Trailers,” SAE 06CV-222 2006
- “SAE Wind Tunnel Test Procedure for Trucks and Buses,” SAE J1252, SAE Recommended Practice 1979
- Cooper, K. R. Watkins, S. “The Unsteady Wind Environment of Road Vehicles, Part One: A Review of the On-road Turbulent Wind Environment,” SAE 2007-01-1236 2007
- Axon, L. Garry, K. P. Howell, J. “An Evaluation of CFD for Modeling the Flow around Stationary and Rotating Isolated Wheels,” SAE 980032 , SAE International Congress and Exhibition February 23–26 1998
- Tennekes, H. Lumley, J. L. A First Course in Turbulence MIT Press Cambridge, England 1992
- www.cd-adapco.com 2008
- Menter, F. R. “Zonal Two Equation k-ω Turbulence Models for Aerodynamic Flows,” AIAA 93-2906, Proc. 24 th Fluid Dynamics Conf Orlando, Florida, USA July 6–9 1993
- Reichardt, H. “Vollstaendige Darstellung der turbulenten Geschwindigkeitsverteilung in glatten Leitungen” Z. Angew. Math. Mech 31 7 208 219 1951
- Pointer, W. D. “Evaluation of Commercial CFD Code Capabilities for Prediction of Heavy Vehicle Drag Coefficients,” AIAA-2004-2254, 34 th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit Portland, Oregon June 28 – July 1, 2004