This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Track-test Evaluation of Aerodynamic Drag Reducing Measures for Class 8 Tractor-Trailers
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published October 07, 2008 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Air resistance, after gross vehicle weight, is the largest factor responsible for vehicle energy loss and has an important influence on fuel consumption. The magnitude of aerodynamic drag is affected by the vehicle's shape, frontal area, and travel speed.
This study aimed to evaluate several aerodynamic drag reduction measures applicable to class 8 tractor-trailer combinations. The tested aerodynamic devices included trailer aft body rear deflectors (boat tails), trailer skirts, gap deflectors, fuel tank fairings and truck rear-axle fenders. It also assessed the aerodynamic influence of opened doors on an empty wood chip van trailer on the fuel consumption of the tractor-trailer combination.
The tests were conducted according to SAE J1321 Joint TMC/SAE Fuel Consumption Test Procedure - Type II. Testing took place on a closed test track at a fixed speed of 100 km/h, in order to eliminate the inconveniences of on-highway tests, such as the influences of traffic and the variation in driver response. The high-speed test track was a high-banked parabolic oval with a length of 6.4 km. The tests indicated that the influence on fuel consumption was less than 2% for fuel tank fairings, truck rear-axle fender, tractor-trailer gap deflector, and the opened doors on the empty chip van trailer. The test results showed up to 5% improvement in fuel consumption for the test vehicles equipped with boat tail devices, and up to 7% for the vehicles equipped with trailer skirts. For some of the tested devices, full-scale wind tunnel test results were available and comparisons were made between these results and track test results.
Conservative estimations for Canadian transportation conditions show that some aerodynamic devices could bring annual greenhouse gas emissions reductions of four tonnes per vehicle. Combinations of different devices, such as trailer skirts and boat tails, would certainly increase the benefits. With payback periods ranging from 1.4 to 2.7 years, the majority of the tested aerodynamic devices represent viable measures to increase fuel efficiency and to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
CitationSurcel, M., Michaelsen, J., and Provencher, Y., "Track-test Evaluation of Aerodynamic Drag Reducing Measures for Class 8 Tractor-Trailers," SAE Technical Paper 2008-01-2600, 2008, https://doi.org/10.4271/2008-01-2600.
Aerodynamics and Fuel Economy ~ Aerodynamic Devices and Methods & Technologies
Number: SP-2219; Published: 2008-10-07
Number: SP-2219; Published: 2008-10-07
- US Department of Energy “Technology Roadmap for the 21st Century Truck Program” Washington DC 2000
- Michaelsen, J. “Using the OTTO Truck-Simulation Software to Manage Haul Operations” Proceedings of 6th international Symposium on Heavy Vehicles Weight and Dimensions Saskatoon, Canada 2000
- Finch, W. F. “Motor Truck Engineering Handbook” Forth 1-56091-378-9 Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, PA 1994
- Gillespie, D. T. “Fundamentals of Vehicle Dynamics” 1-56091-199-9 Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, PA 1992
- SAE International “Joint TMC/SAE Fuel Consumption Test Procedure - Type II” SAE Surface Vehicle Recommended Practice J1321 Warrendale, PA 1986
- Jones, F. E. “The Air Density Equation and the Transfer of the Mass Unit” Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards 83 419 428 Gaithersburg, MD 1978
- Leuschen, J. Cooper, K.R. “Full-Scale Wind Tunnel Tests of Production and Prototype, Second-Generation Aerodynamic Drag-Reduction Devices for Tractor-Trailers” SAE 2006-01-3456 , SAE Commercial Vehicle Engineering Congress and Exhibition Chicago, IL, USA 2006
- Statistics Canada “Canadian Vehicle Survey: Annual 2006” 1499-318X Ottawa, Canada 2007
- National Resources Canada, Office of Energy Efficiency