This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Fatalities by Seating Position and Principal Direction of Force (PDOF) for 1st, 2nd and 3rd Row Occupants
Technical Paper
2008-01-1850
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Event:
Government/Industry Meeting
Language:
English
Abstract
Purpose: A better understanding of rear occupant fatality risks is needed to guide the development of safety improvements for 2nd and 3rd row occupants. This study investigates fatal accidents of 1st, 2nd and 3rd row occupants by principal direction of force (PDOF), irrespective of restraint use. It determined the number of fatalities, exposure and fatality risk.
Methods: 1996-2005 FARS was analyzed for occupant fatalities by seating position (1st, 2nd and 3rd row) and principal direction of force (1-12 o'clock PDOF, rollover and other/unknown). Light vehicles were included with model year 1990+. 1996-2005 NASS-CDS was similarly analyzed for occupant exposure. Fatality risk was defined as the number of fatalities in FARS for a given category divided by the exposure from NASS-CDS.
Results: Ten percent (9.6%) of fatalities were to 2nd row occupants in FARS. About 2,080 deaths occur to 2nd row occupants annually. 38.4% died in rollovers and 26.8% in frontal crashes. There were about 300,000 2nd row occupants annually in towaway crashes in NASS-CDS, representing 12.3% of all occupants. Most are exposed to front impacts (51.5%) followed by side impacts (21.0%). Rear impacts are the lowest frequency (10.0%). Fatality risk is highest in rollovers (2.52%) followed by right-side impacts (0.91%). Less than one percent (0.4%) of fatalities was to 3rd row occupants in FARS. About 94 deaths occur to 3rd row occupants annually. 61.0% died in rollovers, and 18.6% in frontal crashes. There were about 17,900 3rd row occupants annually in tow away crashes in NASS-CDS, representing 0.7% of all occupants. Fatality risk is highest in rollovers (2.01%) followed by left-side impacts (0.37%).
Conclusions: 2nd and 3rd row occupants have lower overall risks than the driver. However, they have high risks in crashes where the PDOF is in the proximity of their seating position. This involves oblique side impacts and oblique rear impacts (3-5 o'clock for 2nd row right and 7-9 o'clock for 2nd row left occupants).
Recommended Content
| Journal Article | Relationship between Seatback Stiffness/Strength and Risk of Serious/Fatal Injury in Rear-Impact Crashes |
| Technical Paper | Performance of Rear Seat Belt Restraints |
| Technical Paper | Crash Injury Risks for Obese Occupants |
Topic
Citation
Viano, D. and Parenteau, C., "Fatalities by Seating Position and Principal Direction of Force (PDOF) for 1st, 2nd and 3rd Row Occupants," SAE Technical Paper 2008-01-1850, 2008, https://doi.org/10.4271/2008-01-1850.Also In
References
- Anton's Law House Committee on Energy and Commerce October 2 2002 Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation August 2 2001
- Arbelaez RA Nolan JM Dakin GJ Lund AK Comparison of EuroSID-2 and SID-IIs in vehicle side impact tests with the IIHS barrier SAE 2002-22-0019 46th Stapp Car Crash Conference The Stapp Association Ann Arbor, MI 2002
- Balavich KM Nayef A Dummy head kinematics in tripped rollover tests and a test method to evaluate the effect of curtain airbag deployment SAE 2002-01-0690 Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, PA 2002
- Dalmotas D Krzyzewski J Restraint System Effectiveness as a Function of Seating Position SAE 870489 Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, PA 1987
- Dalmotas D Tylko S Assessment of injury risk to children from side airbags SAE 2000-01-SC02 44th Stapp Car Crash Conference The Stapp Association Ann Arbor, MI 2000
- Esterlitz JR Relative risk of death from ejection by crash type and crash mode Accid Anal Prev. 21 5 459 68 1989
- Evans L. Rear compared to front seat restraint system effectiveness in preventing fatalities SAE 870485 Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, PA 1987
- Haberl J Eichinger S Wintershoff W New rear safety belt geometry ∼ a contribution to increase belt usage and restraint effectiveness SAE 870488 Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, PA 1987
- Horsch JD Occupant dynamics as a function of impact angle and belt restraint SAE 801310 24th Stapp Car Crash Conference Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, PA 1980
- Huelke DF Sherman HW Elliott AF The Rear Seat Occupant From Data Analysis of Selected Clinical Case Studies SAE 870487 Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, PA 1987
- Kahane CJ Fatality and injury reducing effectiveness of lap belts for back seat occupants SAE 870486 Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, PA 1987
- Kaleto HA Winkelbauer D Havens CJ Smith M Advancements in testing methodologies in response to the FMVSS 201U requirements for curtain-type side airbags SAE 2001-01-0470 Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, PA 2001
- Karlbrink L Mellander H. A three-point belt in the rear center seating position as accessories SAE 870483 Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, PA 1987
- Kawaguchi K Kaneko N Iwamoto T Fukushima M Akiko-Abe A Ogawa S. Optimized Restraint Systems for Various-Sized Rear Seat Occupants in Frontal Crash SAE 2003-01-1230 Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, PA 2003
- Nelson D Sparke L. Improved side impact protection: Design optimization for minimum harm SAE 2002-01-0167 Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, PA 2002
- Padmanaban J Ray RM Safety performance of rear seat occupant restraint systems SAE 922524 Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, PA 1992
- Parenteau C Viano DC Field Data Analysis of Rear Occupant Injuries Part I: Adults and Teenagers SAE 2003-01-0153 Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, PA 2003
- Parenteau C Viano DC Field Data Analysis of Rear Occupant Injuries Part II: Children, Toddlers and Infants SAE 2003-01-0154 Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, PA 2003
- Smith MJ Kaleto HA Nowak TJ Gotwals DG Advancements in equipment and testing methodologies for airbag systems in response to changes to federal safety requirements SAE 2003-01-0497 Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, PA 2003
- Smith S. Crash Protection for Rear Seat Occupants SAE 870479 Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, PA 1987
- Vander Lugt D Connolly T Bhalsod D Vehicle compatibility - Analysis of the factors influencing side-impact occupant injury SAE 1999-01-0067 Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, PA 1999
- Verma MK Lange RC Lavelle JP Relationship of crash test procedures to vehicle compatibility SAE 2003-01-0900 Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, PA 2003
- Viano DC Parenteau CS Prasad P Burnett R. Occupant Responses in High-Speed Rear Crashes: Analysis of Government-Sponsored Tests SAE 2008-01-0188 Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale PA 2008
- Viano DC Parenteau CS Prasad P Burnett R. Stiff versus Yielding Seats: Analysis of Matched Rear Impact Tests SAE 2007-01-0708 Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale PA 2007
- Viano DC Parenteau CS Rollover Crashes: Vehicles, Crashes and Injuries SAE Book PT-101 Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale PA 2004
- Viano DC Parenteau CS Fatalities of Children 0-7 Years Old in the 2nd Row In print Traffic Injury Prevention 9 3 June 2008
- Viano DC Role of the Seat in Rear Crash Safety SAE Book 0-7680-0847-6 Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, PA SAE R-317:1-491 2002
- Warner CY Meissner U Bandstra R Performance of rear seat belt restraints SAE 2003-01-0155 Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, PA 2003
- Winkler G Stierle T Malbouef T Side-impact restraint activation system combining acceleration and dynamic-pressure sensing SAE 2003-01-0197 Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, PA 2003