This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Comparison between Unthrottled, Single and Two-valve Induction Strategies Utilising Direct Gasoline Injection: Emissions, Heat-release and Fuel Consumption Analysis
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published June 23, 2008 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
For a spark-ignition engine, the parasitic loss suffered as a result of conventional throttling has long been recognised as a major reason for poor part-load fuel efficiency. While lean, stratified charge, operation addresses this issue, exhaust gas aftertreatment is more challenging compared with homogeneous operation and three-way catalyst after-treatment. This paper adopts a different approach: homogeneous charge direct injection (DI) operation with variable valve actuations which reduce throttling losses. In particular, low-lift and early inlet valve closing (EIVC) strategies are investigated.
Results from a thermodynamic single cylinder engine are presented that quantify the effect of two low-lift camshafts and one standard high-lift camshaft operating EIVC strategies at four engine running conditions; both, two- and single-inlet valve operation were investigated. Tests were conducted for both port and DI fuelling, under stoichiometric conditions.
Measurements of specific fuel consumption and exhaust emissions were carried out, while the combustion was analysed using heat release analysis. These tests were carried out in a thermodynamic single cylinder engine. In parallel, tests were conducted in a second engine having the same combustion chamber geometry but with extensive optical access through a transparent cylinder liner. The results from the thermodynamic engine were correlated with in-cylinder measurements in the optical engine of the fuel spray.
The results show that there are worthwhile fuel consumption and exhaust emission benefits to be gained through de-activation of one of the two inlet valves at part-load conditions. The performance characteristics under certain load conditions were dependant on which intake valve was actuated.
- Rishin Patel - University College London
- Nicos Ladommatos - University College London
- Philip A. Stansfield - Loughborough University
- Graham Wigley - Loughborough University
- Colin P. Garner - Loughborough University
- Graham Pitcher - Powertrain Research, Lotus Engineering Ltd
- James W. G. Turner - Powertrain Research, Lotus Engineering Ltd
- Hans Nuglisch - Continental Automotive France S.A.S
CitationPatel, R., Ladommatos, N., Stansfield, P., Wigley, G. et al., "Comparison between Unthrottled, Single and Two-valve Induction Strategies Utilising Direct Gasoline Injection: Emissions, Heat-release and Fuel Consumption Analysis," SAE Technical Paper 2008-01-1626, 2008, https://doi.org/10.4271/2008-01-1626.
- Zhao, F., Harrington, D. and Lai, M.C., “Automotive Gasoline direct-Injection Engines”. Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc., Warrendale, PA, 2002. ISBN 0-7680-0882-4.
- Frierl, R. and Kluting, M., “The Third Generation of Valvetrains - New Fully Variable Valvetrains for Throttle-Free Load Control”. SAE paper number 2000-01-1227, 2000.
- Tuttle, J., “Controlling Engine Load by Means of Early Intake-Valve Closing”. SAE paper number 820408, 1982.
- Cleary, D. and Silvas, G., “Unthrottled engine operation with Variable Intake Valve Lift, Duration, and Timing”. SAE paper number 2007-01-1282, 2007.
- Sellnau, M. and Rask, E., “Two-Step Variable Valve Actuation for Fuel Economy, Emissions, and Performance”. SAE paper number 2003-01-0029, 2003.
- Kreuter, P., Heuser, P., Reinicke-Murmann, J., Erz, R., Peter, U. and Bocker, O., “Variable Valve Actuation - Switchable and Continuously Variable Valve Lifts”. SAE paper number 2003-01-0026.
- Shiga, S., Yagi, S., Morita, M., Matsumoto T., Nakamura, H. and Karasawa, T., “Effect of Early-Closing of Intake-Valve on the Engine Performance in a Spark-Ignition Engine”. SAE paper number 960585, 1996.
- Wiles, M. Ghandi, J.B. and Probst, D., “Bulk Cylinder Flowfield Effects on Mixing in Disi Engines”. SAE paper number 2005-01-0096.
- Alger, T., Hall, M. and Matthews, R.D., “Effects of Swirl and Tumble on In-Cylinder Fuel Distribution in a Central Injected DISI Engine”. SAE paper number 2001-01-0533, 2000.
- Hardalupas, Y., Taylor, A.M.K.P., Whitelaw, J.H., Ishii, K., Miyano, H. and Urata, U., “Influence of Injection Timing on In-Cylinder Fuel Distribution in a Honda Vtec-E Engine”. SAE paper number 950507, 1995.
- Ghauri, A., “An investigation into the Effects of Variable Valve Actuation on Combustion and Emissions in an SI Engine”. PhD Thesis University College London, 1995.
- Stansfield, P.A., Wigley, G., Garner, C.P., Patel, R., Ladommatos, N., Pitcher, G., Turner J.W.G., Nuglisch, H. and Helie, J., “Unthrottled Engine Operation using Variable Valve Actuation: The Impact on the Flow Field, Mixing and Combustion”. SAE paper number 2007-01-1414, 2007.
- Pearson, R.J., Bassett, M.D., Fleming, N.P. and Rodemann, T., “Lotus Engineering Software - An Approach to Model Based-Design”. MDI North American User Conference, Scottsdale, AZ, 2002.