Try Mobilus Beta
Search tips
 This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.

Implications of Quality Loss Function in Unified Methodology - LTB Case with Target

Journal Article
2008-01-1435
ISSN: 1946-3979, e-ISSN: 1946-3987
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4271/2008-01-1435
Published April 14, 2008 by SAE International in United States
Implications of Quality Loss Function in Unified Methodology - LTB Case with Target
Sector:
Citation: Sharma, N., Cudney, E., Drain, D., and Ragsdell, K., "Implications of Quality Loss Function in Unified Methodology - LTB Case with Target," SAE Int. J. Mater. Manf. 1(1):768-777, 2009, https://doi.org/10.4271/2008-01-1435.
Language: English

References

  1. Fowlkes, William Y. Creveling, Clyde M. 1995 Engineering Methods for Robust Product Design Addison-Wesley Publishing Company
  2. Taguchi, Genichi Chowdhury, Subir Wu, Yuin TAGUCHI'S Quality Engineering Handbook 2004 21
  3. Taguchi Genichi Chowdhury Subir Taguchi Shin 1999 Robust Engineering McGraw Hill
  4. Sharma, N. K. Ragsdell, K. M. Quality Loss Function - Common Methodology for Nominal-The-Best, Smaller-The-Better, Larger-The-Better Cases 2007 World Congress, SAE International Paper No. 2007-01-0797
  5. Sagan, Carl 1980 Cosmos Random House New York
  6. MIT Clausing Don P. Dr.
  7. El-Haik, Basem 2005 Axiomatic Quality Wiley-Interscience
  8. Maghsoodloo, S. 1991 “The exact relationship of Taguchi's signal-to-noise ratio to his quality loss function,” Journal of Quality Technology 22 1 57 67 Jan 1990
  9. Taguchi, Genichi Elsayed, Elsayed A. Hsiang, Thomas 1989 Quality Engineering in Production Systems McGraw-Hill Publishing Company
  10. Venkateswaren Shankar 2003 “Warranty cost prediction using Mahalanobis Distance” University of Missouri-Rolla

Cited By