This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
A Correlation Study between the Full Scale Wind Tunnels of Chrysler, Ford, and General Motors
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 14, 2008 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
A correlation of aerodynamic wind tunnels was initiated between Chrysler, Ford and General Motors under the umbrella of the United States Council for Automotive Research (USCAR). The wind tunnels used in this correlation were the open jet tunnel at Chrysler's Aero Acoustic Wind Tunnel (AAWT), the open jet tunnel at the Jacobs Drivability Test Facility (DTF) that Ford uses, and the closed jet tunnel at General Motors Aerodynamics Laboratory (GMAL).
Initially, existing non-competitive aerodynamic data was compared to determine the feasibility of facility correlation. Once feasibility was established, a series of standardized tests with six vehicles were conducted at the three wind tunnels. The size and body styles of the six vehicles were selected to cover the spectrum of production vehicles produced by the three companies. All vehicles were tested at EPA loading conditions.
Despite the significant differences between the three facilities, the correlation results were very good. The correlation test program and aerodynamic results will be discussed in detail. The benefits of this correlation project include improved and standardized testing procedures, and an expanded database of competitive vehicle information without increased testing costs, which in turn allows for increased wind tunnel time for product development.
CitationTortosa, N., Meinert, F., (Max) Schenkel, F., Lounsberry, T. et al., "A Correlation Study between the Full Scale Wind Tunnels of Chrysler, Ford, and General Motors," SAE Technical Paper 2008-01-1205, 2008, https://doi.org/10.4271/2008-01-1205.
- Buchheim et al “Comparison Tests Between Major European and North American Automotive Wind Tunnels, ” SAE Paper No. 830301 1983
- Maeda K. et al “Correlation Tests Between Japanese Full Scale Automotive Wind Tunnels Using the Correction Methods for Drag Coefficient, ” SAE Paper No. 2005-01-1457 2005
- Walter J.A. Gleason M.E. et al “The DaimlerChrysler Full-Scale Aeroacoustic Wind Tunnel, ” SAE Paper No. 2003-01-0426 2003
- Mercker E. Wickern G. Wiedemann J. “Contemplation of Nozzle Blockage in Open Jet Wind-Tunnels in View of Different ‘Q'” Determination Techniques, ” SAE Paper No. 970136 1997
- SAE 960671 “On the Correction of Interference Effects in Open Jet Wind Tunnels” Mercker E. Wiedemann J. 1996
- Walter J.A. Williams J. et al “The Driveability Test Facility Wind Tunnel No. 8, ” SAE Paper No. 2002-01-0252 2002
- Walter J.A. Koester W.D. et al “Uncertainty Analysis of Aerodynamic Coefficients in an Automotive Wind Tunnel, ” SAE Paper No. 200501-0870 2005
- Kelly K. B. Provencher L. G. Schenkel F. K. “The General Motors Aerodynamic Laboratory-A Full-Scale Automotive Wind Tunnel, ” SAE Paper No. 820371 1982
- Bettes W.H. Kelly K.B. “The Influence of Wind Tunnel Solid Boundaries on Automotive Test Data, ” SAE Paper No. 741031 1974
- US EPA OMS Advisory Circular 55c, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Dec 1986