This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Rethinking the Automotive Design and Development Processes for Product Realization
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 14, 2008 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Analytical thinking is the most prevailing attribute among engineers and applied scientists. Breaking systems or subsystem down to its fundamental components to understand each and every detail is core of analytical thinking. By examining most educational and training programs in applied sciences and engineering the resulting conclusion will be that analytical skills and its development is the core of these programs. While truly analytical skills deserve that role it is important to understand its effects and how it is used in different contexts. For example, while analytical skills are key in reverse engineering of a product or a process it is the integrative skills that are needed to build such a product or a process. In other wards those who are skilled in one type of activity should understand its limitation in certain context to achieve the desired results.
From their points of inception most engineering design processes are created by highly skilled analytical engineers and scientist. For this reason, in addition to the multitude of knowledge and skill sets needed to create an automobile, most automotive design and development processes are traditionally sequential and segmented in nature. Also the lack of fast and reliable modeling and simulation tools added to the separation between not only design and manufacturability but also between design and analysis for many years. By carefully studying these design processes it easy to realize that they are the natural product of their times and genius analytical skills that produced them. These skills are manifested in tackling the complexity through the sequential and segmented structure of the processes and overcoming the lack of modeling and simulation tools by a series of physical builds and tests.
As the competitive drives, technologies, and knowledge have increased it is becoming very clear that there is no need for the sequential, segmented, build and test aspects of the traditional automotive design and development processes. Terms like architectural integration, performance integration, and concurrent engineering are shaping a new paradigms in automotive industries. For the last few decades the automotive design and development processes have been continuously evolving and reflecting these new paradigms. This evolution process, however, is slow and in some cases costly. Therefore, to save time and cost, there is a need for getting back to the drawing board and re-design the automotive product development processes based on today's realities.
In this paper, a guide to rethinking the product development processes is presented. This approach reflects the natural flow and integration of the creation phases from inception to realization. The design and validation processes, in this approach, are looked upon as natural phases for creation in which innovation, analysis, and integration are necessary for the realization of the desired product attributes and qualities. For example, designing for manufacturability as an attribute during the development phase is a natural way of thinking and not an afterthought. To further demonstrate the approach and illustrate the concepts, presented in the paper, several examples are discussed.
|Book||Finite Element Analysis for Design Engineers, Second Edition|
|Journal Article||Verifying Electromagnetic Simulation Results with Measurements|
CitationEl-Sayed, M., "Rethinking the Automotive Design and Development Processes for Product Realization," SAE Technical Paper 2008-01-0861, 2008, https://doi.org/10.4271/2008-01-0861.
- Sperry R. W. “Hemispheric specialization of mental faculties in the brain of man” Barber T. X. Advances in Altered States of Consciousness and Human Potentialities 1 New York 1976
- Hermann N. “Whole Brain Corporation” Brain Mind Bulletin 6 4 Los Angeles 1981
- Tovey M.J. 1986 Thinking Styles and Modeling System. Design Studies 7 1
- Dew J. R. “Are you a Right-Brain or Left-Brain Thinker?” Quality Progress Magazine 91 93 April 1996
- Ivry R. Robertson L. The two sides of perception MIT Press Cambridge, MA 1998
- McDonald S. “Hemispheric asymmetries in the split-fovea model of semantic processing” Brain and Language 88 339 354 2004
- Hipple E. V. “The Sources of Innovation” Oxford University Press Oxford 1988
- Utterback J. M. “Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation” Harvard Business School Press Boston, MA 1996
- Christensen C. M. “The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail” Harvard Business School Press Boston, MA 1997
- Christensen C. M. “The Innovator's Solution: Creating and Sustaining Successful Growth” Harvard Business School Press Boston, MA 2003
- Clausing D. Fay V. “Effective Innovation” ASME Press 2004
- Maurice F. H. Campbell R. B. Jr. “Product Development Processes: Three Vectors of Improvement, ” working paper, MIT Center for Innovation in Product Development 2003
- Patterson M. L. “Accelerating Innovation” Van Nostrand Reinhold, Chapter 2 1993
- Svensén U. Beskow C. Hagås K. Heper Y. Nilsson K. Söderquist K. “Global Study on Product Development” 2000
- Baldwin C., Y. Clark K., B. “Modularity in the Design of Complex Engineering Systems” In Complex Engineered Systems: Science Meets Technology, edited by Ali Minai, Dan Braha and Yaneer Bar Yam. New England Complex Systems Institute Series on Complexity N.Y. 2006
- Koch R. “The 80-20 Principle: The Secret of Achieving More With Less” London Nicholas Braeley Publishing 1997
- Jensen B. Simplicity “The New Competitive Advantage in a World of More, Better, Faster” Cambridge MA Perseus Books 2000
- Wheelwright S. C. Clark K. B. “Revolutionizing Product Development, Quantum Leaps in Speed, Efficiency and Quality” The Free Press New York 1992
- Ulrich K. Eppinger S. “Product Design and Development” McGraw-Hill New York, NY 1995
- Cross N. “Engineering Design Methods - Strategies for Product Design” John Wiley & Sons West Sussex, UK 1994
- Beskow C. “Product Development in Silicon Valley: A One-year Study of Practice and Process” Research Report TRITAMMK 1999:18, Department of Machine Design, The Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) Stockholm, Sweden 1999
- Verganti R. “Planned Flexibility: Linking Anticipation and Reaction in Product Development” Projects. Journal of Product Innovation Management 16 363 376 1999
- Koen P.A. Ajamian G.M. Boyce S. Clamen A. Fisher E. Fountoulakis S. Johnson A. Puri P. Seibert R. “Fuzzy Front End: Effective Methods, Tools and Techniques” In The PDMA Tool book for New Product Development Belliveau P. Griffin A. Somermeyer S. Product Development and Management Association 2002
- Zhang Q. Doll W. J. “The fuzzy front end and success of new product development: a causal model” European Journal of Innovation Management 4 2 95 112 2001
- Thomke S. Fujimoto T. “The Effect of 'Front-Loading' Problem-Solving on Product Development Performance.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 2000
- Gulati R., K. Eppinger S., D. “The coupling of product architecture and organizational structure decisions” Working Paper No. 151, MIT International Center for Research on the Management of Technology Cambridge, MA May 1996
- Ward A. Liker J. K. Cristiano J. J. Sobek D. K. II. “The Second Toyota Paradox: How Delaying Decisions Can Make Better Cars Faster” Sloan Management Review 43 61 1995
- Sobek D. K. II Liker J. K. Ward A. C. “Another Look at How Toyota Integrates Product Development” Harvard Business Review July-August 1998
- Lawrence P. R. Lorsch J. W. “Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration” Harvard Business School Classics Harvard Business School Press Boston 1967
- Herrmann N. The whole brain business book New York Mc Graw Hill 1996
- Vexov F. “Virtual Reality & Presence” VIEW: Visual Interactive Effective Worlds Lorentz International Center for workshops in the Sciences 2007
- Anderson D., M. “Design for Manufacturability and Concurrent Engineering” CIM Press 2004