This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Evaluating Frontal Crash Test Force-Deformation Data for Vehicle to Vehicle Frontal Crash Compatibility
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 14, 2008 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Vehicle stiffness is one of the three major factors in vehicle to vehicle compatibility in a frontal crash; the other two factors are vehicle mass and frontal geometry. Vehicle to vehicle compatibility in turn is an increasingly important topic due to the rapid change in the size and characteristics of the automotive fleet, particularly the increase of the percentage of trucks and SUVs.
Due to the non-linear nature of the mechanics of vehicle structure, frontal stiffness is not a properly defined metric. This research is aimed at developing a well defined method to quantify frontal stiffness for vehicle-to-vehicle crash compatibility. The method to be developed should predict crash outcome and controlling the defined metric should improve the crash outcome. The criterion that is used to judge the aggressivity of a vehicle in this method is the amount of deformation caused to the vulnerable vehicles when crashed with the subject vehicle.
The methodology was developed to evaluate the force deformation data from National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)'s New Car Assessment Program (NCAP) for vehicle to vehicle frontal crash compatibility. This methodology relied on a simplified single-mass single-structure model. Crash simulations of models of vehicles of different mass and structure characteristics were conducted.
It was found that the deformation in the vulnerable vehicles depended on the force levels of the aggressive vehicles more than the approximated stiffness values. Vehicles frontal structures were represented in energy dissipated vs. maximum force reached graphs instead of a force vs. deformation graphs. A less aggressive -more compatible- vehicle would dissipate more energy in deforming its frontal structure before reaching a certain force level. Conversely, a more aggressive vehicle would reach high force levels before dissipating a lot of energy.
It is recommended that aggressive vehicle should dissipate half of the energy of a particular severity crash (25-30 mph) before reaching a certain amount of crush forces. These forces should be lower than the force levels required to collapse the occupant compartment of the vulnerable vehicles (500-600kN).
|Technical Paper||Heavy Truck Frontal Crash Protection System Development|
|Technical Paper||Road User Risk with Older Light Trucks|
|Journal Article||Analysis of High-Speed Sideswipe Collisions Using Data from Small Overlap Tests|
CitationMostafa, K., Digges, K., and Motevalli, V., "Evaluating Frontal Crash Test Force-Deformation Data for Vehicle to Vehicle Frontal Crash Compatibility," SAE Technical Paper 2008-01-0813, 2008, https://doi.org/10.4271/2008-01-0813.
Pedestrian Safety, Vehicle Aggressivity and Compatability in Automotive Crashes, 2008
Number: SP-2165; Published: 2008-04-14
Number: SP-2165; Published: 2008-04-14
- Augenstein J. Perdeck E. Mostafa K. Digges K. Bahouth G. Morgan R. “The Role of Intrusion in Injury Causation in Frontal Crashes,” SAE, 2005-01-1376 April 2005
- Digges K. Bahouth G. “Stiffness and Geometric Incompatibility in Collisions between Cars and Light Trucks,” SAE, 2003-01-0907 March 2003
- Elmarakbi A. Zu J. 2006 “Crash Analysis and Modeling of Two Vehicles in Frontal Collisions Using Two Types of Smart Front-end Structures: An Analytical Approach Using IHBM,” International Journal of Crashworthiness 11 5 467 483
- Edwards M. Davies H. Hobbs A. “Development of Test Procedures and Performance Criteria to Improve Compatibility in Car Frontal Collisions,” 18 th ESV 86 May 2003
- Gabler H. Hollowell W. “The Aggressivity of Light Truck and Vans in Traffic Crashes,” SAE, 980908 March 1998
- Haenchen D. Schwarz T. Thomas G. Zobel R. “Feasible Steps towards Improved Crash Compatibility,” SAE, 2004-01-1167 March 2004
- Hirayama S. Obayashi K. Okabe T. “Compatibility of Frontal Impact Collisions between Heavy and Light Cars,” 18 th ESV, 454 May 2003
- Jenefeldt F. Thomson R. 2004 “A Methodology to Assess Frontal Stiffness to Improve Crash Compatibility,” International Journal of Crashworthiness 9 5 475 482
- Jerinsky M. Hollowel W. “NHTSA's Review of a Vehicle Compatibility Performance Metric through Computer Simulation,” IMECE, 2003-44045 2003
- Kitagawa Y. Makita M. Pal C. “Evaluation and Research of Vehicle Body Stiffness and Strength for Car to Car Compatibility,” SAE, 2003-01-0908 March 2003
- Meyerson S. Nolan J. “Effects of Geometry and Stiffness on the Frontal Compatibility of Utility Vehicles,” 18 th ESV, 91 May 2003
- Mostafa K. Digges K. Bahouth G. Morgan R. “Vehicle Frontal Stiffness in a Front to Front Crash,” SAE, 2005-01-1375 April 2005
- “America's Bestsellers of 2006,” http://autos.msn.com/advice/article.aspx?contentid=4023925 13 March 2007
- Nusholtz G. Xu L. Shi Y. Di Domenico L. “Vehicle Mass and Stiffness: Search or a Relationship,” SAE, 2004-01-1168 March 2004
- O'Neill B. Kyrychenko S. “Potential Benefits from Enhancing Crash Compatibility between Cars and Light Trucks in Front-to-Front Crashes,” IIHS October 2003
- O'Neill B. Kyrychenko S. “Crash Incompatibilities between Cars and Light Trucks: Issues and Potential Countermeasures,” SAE, 2004-01-1166 March 2004
- Summers S. Prasad A. Hollowell W. “NHTSA's Research Program for Vehicle Aggressivity and Fleet Compatibility,” 17 th ESV, 249 June 2001
- Summers S. Hollowell W. Prasad A. “Design Considerations for a Compatibility Test Procedure,” SAE, 2002-01-1022 March 2002
- Summers S. Hollowell W. Prasad A. “NHTSA's Research Program for Vehicle Compatibility,” 18 th ESV, 307 May 2003
- Takizawa S. Higuchi E. Iwabe T. Sugimoto “Experimental Evaluation of Test Procedures for Frontal Collision Compatibility,” SAE, 2004-01-1162 March 2004
- Verma M Nagappala R. Murugan M. Tung Y. 2004 “Evaluation of Structural Parameters for Vehicle Crash Compatibility,” International Journal of Crashworthiness 9 6 577 586