This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
The Calculation of Mass Fraction Burn of Ethanol-Gasoline Blended Fuels Using Single and Two-Zone Models
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 14, 2008 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
One-dimensional single-zone and two-zone analyses have been exercised to calculate the mass fraction burned in an engine operating on ethanol/gasoline-blended fuels using the cylinder pressure and volume data. The analyses include heat transfer and crevice volume effects on the calculated mass fraction burned. A comparison between the two methods is performed starting from the derivation of conservation of energy and the method to solve the mass fraction burned rates through the results including detailed explanation of the observed differences and trends. The apparent heat release method is used as a point of reference in the comparison process. Both models are solved using the LU matrix factorization and first-order Euler integration.
Experiments were conducted with a Cooperative Fuels Research (CFR) engine holding Net Indicated Mean Effective Pressure (Net IMEP) constant at 330 kPa and fueling at the respective stoichiometric condition for the air flow and ethanol fuel blend being tested. This study included four ethanol-gasoline fuel blends: E20, E40, E60, E84, and gasoline (E0) as a baseline. The results show that all three models consistently produce similar mass fraction burned profiles for the five different fuels tested. Furthermore, utilizing the gasoline case with gamma as a function of temperature shows that the two-zone model indicated 3% higher combustion efficiency compared to the single-zone model and 17% higher than the apparent heat release method. However, the location of the 10%, 50%, and 90% mass fraction burn points calculated between the methods are within 1° of each other when combustion phasing is near maximum brake torque (MBT). For both the single and two-zone models, the effect of crevice and heat transfer effects appears near the end of the combustion process. Without the crevice model, the computed combustion efficiency of the single-zone model decreases by 8%. Without both crevice and heat transfer models the combustion efficiency decreases by 15% compared to the result of the single-zone full model. The combustion efficiency as calculated with the two-zone model decrease by 5% without crevice effects and 11% without both crevice and heat transfer effects.
CitationYeliana, ., Cooney, C., Worm, J., and Naber, J., "The Calculation of Mass Fraction Burn of Ethanol-Gasoline Blended Fuels Using Single and Two-Zone Models," SAE Technical Paper 2008-01-0320, 2008, https://doi.org/10.4271/2008-01-0320.
SI Combustion and Direct Injection SI Engine Technology, 2008
Number: SP-2187 ; Published: 2008-04-14
Number: SP-2187 ; Published: 2008-04-14
- Rassweiler, G.M., Withrow L., 1938, “Motion Pictures of Engine Flames Correlated with Pressure”, SAE Transactions Vol. 42, Sec. 3
- Krieger, R.B., Borman G.L., 1966, “The Computation of Apparent Heat Release for Internal Combustion Engines”, ASME paper 66/WA/DGP-4
- Heywood, J.B., Higgins J.M., Watts P.A., Tabaczynski R.J., 1979, “Development and Use of a Cycle Simulation to Predict SI Engine Efficiency and NOx Emissions”, SAE 790291
- Gatowski, J.A., Balles E.N., Chun K.M., Nelson F.E., Ekchian J.A., Heywood J.B., 1984, “Heat Release Analysis of Engine Data”, SAE 841359
- Chun, K.M., Heywood J.B., 1987, “Estimating Heat-Release and Mass-of-Mixture Burned from Spark-Ignition Engine Pressure Data”, Combustion Science & Technology, Vol. 54, pp. 133-143
- Klein, M., Eriksson L, 2004, “A Specific Heat Ratio Model for Single-Zone Heat Release Models”, SAE 2004-01-1464
- Cheung H.M., Heywood J.B., 1993, “Evaluation of a One-Zone Burn-Rate Analysis Procedure Using Production SI Engine Pressure Data”, SAE 932749
- Guezennec Y.G., Hamama W., 1999, “Two-Zone Heat Release Analysis of Combustion Data and Calibration of Heat Transfer Correlation in an IC Engine”, SAE 1999-01-0218
- Heywood, J.B., 1988, “Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals”, McGraw-Hill
- Naber, J.D., Bradley E.K., and Szpytman J.E., 2006, “Target Based Rapid Prototyping Control System for Engine Research,” SAE 2006-01-0860
- Lancaster, D.R., Krieger R.B., Lienesch J.H., 1975, “Measurement and Analysis of Engine Pressure Data”, SAE 750026
- Fox, J.W., Cheng W.K., Heywood J.B., 1993, “A Model for Predicting Residual Gas Fraction in Spark-Ignition Engines:, SAE 931025
- Bromberg, L., Cohn D.R., Heywood J.B., 2006, “Calculations of Knock Suppression in Highly Turbocharged Gasoline/Ethanol Engines using Direct Ethanol Injection”, MIT, Cambridge, MA