This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Residual Crush Energy Partitioning, Normal and Tangential Energy Losses
Technical Paper
2007-01-0737
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
Residual damage caused during a collision has been related through the use of crush energy models and impact mechanics directly to the collision energy loss and vehicle velocity changes, ΔV1 and ΔV2. The simplest and most popular form of this crush energy relationship is a linear one and has been exploited for the purpose of accident reconstruction in the well known CRASH3 crush energy algorithm. Nonlinear forms of the relationship between residual crush and collision energy also have been developed. Speed reconstruction models that use the CRASH3 algorithm use point mass impact mechanics, a concept of equivalent mass, visual estimation of the Principle Direction of Force (PDOF) and a tangential correction factor to relate total crush energy to the collision ΔV values. Most algorithms also are based on an assumption of a common velocity at the contact area between the vehicles. The use of point mass mechanics, equivalent mass, a tangential correction factor and zero restitution are unnecessarily restrictive and their use reduces the accuracy of the crush energy methods in crash reconstruction.
This paper shows that planar impact mechanics can be adapted to significantly improve the rigor of using residual crush for crash reconstruction. Planar impact mechanics models the impulses and the changes in momentum of vehicles colliding in a plane including restitution of the collision at the intervehicular contact surface. Two impact coefficients are used, the (normal) coefficient of restitution and the (tangential) impulse ratio. The work of the normal component and tangential component of the crash impulse vector are individually associated with the crush energy and with the tangential energy loss and to each vehicle's ΔV. This work-energy association is referred to as partitioning of the collision energy loss. Partitioning is necessary in order to adapt planar impact mechanics to the CRASH3 measurement protocol. The paper also covers the proper approach to take restitution into account, both as it occurs in the barrier tests to determine each vehicle's crush stiffness coefficients and as it occurs in the impact between two vehicles. Data from oblique frontal barrier crash tests by Struble-Welsh Engineering are used to assess the use of planar impact mechanics and the partitioning of energy loss into crush energy and tangential energy. The process of using crush energy in reconstructions is discussed.
Recommended Content
Technical Paper | Part 572 and Hybrid III Dummy Comparison Sled Test Simulations |
Technical Paper | Evaluation of Vehicle Body Stiffness and Strength for Car to Car Compatibility |
Topic
Citation
Brach, R., Welsh, K., and Brach, R., "Residual Crush Energy Partitioning, Normal and Tangential Energy Losses," SAE Technical Paper 2007-01-0737, 2007, https://doi.org/10.4271/2007-01-0737.Also In
References
- Branch Raymond M. Branch R. Matthew “Crush Energy and Planar Impact Mechanics for Accident Reconstruction” Paper 980025 SAE, Warrendale, PA 1998
- Welsh K. J. Struble D. E. Struble J. D. “Lateral Structural Deformation in Frontal Impacts” Paper 2006-01-1395 SAE, Warrendale, PA 2006
- Woolley R “The IMPAC Program for Collision Analysis” Paper 870046 SAE, Warrendale, PA 1987
- Steffan H. Moser A. “The Collision and Trajectory Models of PC-Crash” Paper 960886 SAE, Warrendale, PA 1996
- Struble D. E. “An Engineering Tool for Accident Reconstruction” Proceedings, 30th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Automotive Medicine Montreal, Quebec 1986
- Brach Raymond M. “Impact Analysis of Two-Vehicle Collisions” Paper 830468 SAE International Congress and Exposition Detroit, MI 1983
- Brach Raymond M. Matthew Brach R. Vehicle Accident Analysis and Reconstruction Methods SAE, Warrendale, PA 2005
- Prasad A “CRASH3 Damage Algorithm Reformulation for Front and Rear Collisions” Paper 900098 SAE, Warrendale, PA 1998
- Smith R. Tumbas N. “Measurement Protocol for Quantifying Vehicle Damage From An Energy Basis Point of View” Paper 880072 SAE, Warrendale, PA 1988
- Campbell K. “Energy as a Basis for Accident Severity” Paper 74056 SAE, Warrendale, PA 1974
- McHentry R. R. CRASH3 User's Guide and Technical Manual NHTSA, DOT Report HS 805 732 February 1981
- McHenry B. McHenry R. “A Revised Damage Analysis Procedure for the Crash Computer Program ” Paper 861894 SAE, Warrendale, PA 1986
- Rose N. Fenton S. Ziernicki R. “Crush and Conservation of Energy Analysis: Toward a Consistent Methodology” Paper 2005-01-1200 SAE, Warrendale, PA 2005
- Brach Raymond M. Matthew Brach R. SAE Professional Development Seminar Vehicle Accident Reconstruction Methods, SAE Warrendale, PA 2005
- Kelvin Lord Tait P. “Treatise on Natural Philosophy” Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK 1903
- Brach R. Mechanical Impact Dynamics Wiley Interscience New York 1991
- Ishikawa H. “Impact Model for Accident Reconstruction--Normal and Tangential Restitution Coefficients” Paper 930654 SAE, Warrendale, PA 1993
- Germane G. Monson K. “Determination and Mechanisms of Motor Vehicle Structural Restitution for Crash Test Data” Paper 1999-01-0097 SAE, Warrendale, PA 1999
- Kerkhoff J. Husher S. E. Varat M. S. Busenga A. M. Hamilton K. “An Investigation Into Vehicle Frontal Impact Stiffness, BEV and Repeated Testing for Reconstruction” Paper 930899 SAE, Warrendale, PA 1993
- Brach R. M. “An Impact Moment Coefficient for Vehicle Collision Analysis” Paper 770014 Transactions, SAE, Warrendale, PA 1977
- Brach R. M. “Identification of Vehicle and Collision Impact Parameters from Crash Tests” Paper 83-DET-13, ASME Design Technical Conference Dearborn, MI 1983