This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Occupant Injury in Rollover Crashes: A Reexamination of Malibu II
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 16, 2007 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
The original Malibu II study, conducted by Bahling et al, found that neck compression loading in rollover crashes is caused by the occupant moving toward the ground and therefore, roof crush was not causally related to the loading. Some have disputed this finding claiming that the occupant does not “dive toward the roof,” but rather, the roof “moves in” toward the occupant, and that roof deformation is the primary cause of cervical spine injuries in rollover crashes.
The original study included a detailed analysis of film and force transducer data for 10 Potentially Injurious Impacts (PII's). This paper presents an independent analysis of these 10 PII's and one additional PII. This analysis uses the film and transducer data to evaluate the timing of roof deformation and neck loading, the magnitude of roof deformation at the time of peak neck load, and the motion of the vehicle and occupants in the inertial reference system.
The data establish that the peak neck load occurs shortly after the roof-to-ground contact, and that there is 1.0-1.5 in. (2.5-4.0 cm) of roof crush at the time of peak neck load. This small magnitude of roof deformation occurs as the body of the vehicle moves toward the ground during the build-up of the neck load.
The roof at the location of the dummy's head was found to be in contact with the ground at the time of peak neck load for nine of the PII's. When the roof at the location of the head was not in contact with the ground at the time of peak neck load, the loading was the result of the roof panel experiencing a change in velocity as a remote part of the rollcaged roof contacted the ground.
Motion of the dummy and the roof in the inertial reference system establishes that the roof does not “move in” toward the occupant, but that the roof and the dummy's head both move toward the ground, that they stop when they contact the ground, and that the chassis of the vehicle and the torso of the dummy continue to move toward the ground, resulting in neck compression loads and roof crush. Therefore, no causal relationship exists between the vehicle deformation and the neck loading.
CitationJames, M., Nordhagen, R., Schneider, D., and Koh, S., "Occupant Injury in Rollover Crashes: A Reexamination of Malibu II," SAE Technical Paper 2007-01-0369, 2007, https://doi.org/10.4271/2007-01-0369.
Safety: Rear Impact, Rollover, Side Impact, Crashworthiness, Air Bags and Bumper Systems
Number: SP-2117; Published: 2007-04-16
Number: SP-2117; Published: 2007-04-16
- Arndt MW Mowry GA Baray PE Clark DA 1997 “The development of a method for determining effective slack in motor vehicle restraint systems for rollover protection” SAE Paper # 970781
- Bahling, GS Bundorf RT Kaspzyk GS Moffatt EA Orlowski KF Stocke JE “Rollover and Drop Tests - The Influence of Roof Strength on Injury Mechanics Using Belted Dummies.” SAE Paper # 902314 1990
- Burstein AH Otis JC Torg JS. Mechanisms and pathomechanics of athletic injuries to the cervical spine Athletic Injuries to the Head, Neck and Face Torg J.S. Philadelphia Lea and Febiger 139 154 1982
- Chirwa, E.C. Mao M. Chen T. Latchford J. “Flaws in Malibu I and II interpretation of test results that have influenced many poor rollover roof designs,” Athens Greece July 2006
- Cooperrider NK Hammoud SA Colwell J 1998 “Characteristics of soil-tripped rollovers” SAE Paper # 980022
- Friedman, D. Nash “Reducing Rollover Occupant Injuries: How and How Soon,” 19th International Technical Conference on Enhanced Safety of Vehicle Conference, 05-0417-W June 2005
- Hodgson VR Thomas LM 1980 “Mechanisms of cervical spine injury during impact to the protected head” SAE Paper # 801300
- Liu YK Dai, QG 1989 “The second stiffest axis of a beam-column: implications for cervical spine trauma” J Biomech Eng. May 111 2 122 7
- McElhaney J Snyder RG States JD Gabrielsen MA 1979 “Biomechanical Analysis of Swimming Pool Neck Injuries” SAE paper # 790137
- McElhaney JH Nightingale RW Winkelstein BA Chancey VC Myers BS Biomechanical Aspect of Cervical Trauma Accidental Injury Springer 2 nd 324 373 2002
- Moffatt, E.A. James M.B. “Headroom, Roof Crush, and Belted Excursion in Rollovers,” SAE 2005-01-0942
- Myers BS McElhaney JH Richardson WJ Nightingale RW Doherty BJ 1991 “The influence of end condition on human cervical spine injury mechanisms” 35 th Stapp Car Crash Conference SAE paper # 912915
- Nightingale RW McElhaney JH Camacho DL Kleinberger M Winkelstein BA Myers BS 1997 “The Dynamic Responses of the Cervical Spine: Buckling, End Conditions, and Tolerance in Compressive Impacts” SAE paper # 973344
- Nusholtz GS Melvin JW Huelke DF Alem NM Blank JG “Response of the cervical spine to superior-inferior head impact” SAE paper # 811005
- Nusholtz GS Huelke DE Lux P Alem NM Montalvo F. 1983 “Cervical spine injury mechanisms” 27 th Stapp Car Crash Conference SAE paper # 831616
- Orlowski KF Bundorf RT Moffatt EA 1985 “Rollover crash tests - the influence of roof strength on injury mechanics” SAE paper # 851734
- Pintar FA Sances A Jr Yoganandan N Reinartz J Maiman DJ Suh JK Unger G Cusick JF Larson SJ 1990 “Biodynamics of the total human cadaveric cervical spine” 34 th Stapp Car Crash Conference SAE paper # 902309
- Pintar FA Yoganandan N Voo L Cusick JF Maiman DJ Sances A Jr 1995 “Dynamic characteristics of the human cervical spine” 39 th Stapp Car Crash Conference SAE paper # 952722
- Piziali R Hopper R Girvan D Merala R 1998 “Injury causation in rollover accidents and the biofidelity of Hybrid III data in rollover tests” SAE paper # 980362
- Ward CC Avanessian HD Ward P Paver JG 2001 “Investigation of restraint function on male and female occupants in rollover events” SAE paper # 2001-01-0177
- Yoganandan N Pintar FA Sances A Jr Maiman DJ 1991 “Strength and kinematic response of dynamic cervical spine injuries” Spine 16 10S 511 517