This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Experimental Optimisation of Manifold and Camshaft Geometries for a Restricted 600cc Four-Cylinder Four-Stroke Engine
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published November 13, 2006 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Restricting the airflow to the engine is a convenient, and therefore common, method of regulating engine performance in many forms of motor sport. Formula SAE, and its European counterpart Formula Student, impose such restrictions on engine configuration. The capacity of the engines must not exceed 610cc but, more specifically to this study, the intake system must be fitted with a 20mm diameter restrictor through which all the air must pass.
There are, however, a number of geometrical parameters which can be changed to maximise the performance of the restricted engine. In this study, the effects of modifying the restrictor design, intake runner length, intake camshaft profile, exhaust geometry, and silencer design were measured using a transient dynamometer. These tests were performed on a 600cc four-stroke, four-cylinder Yamaha YZF R6 engine. For each configuration examined, the ignition timing and fuel maps of the DTA engine management system were optimised using torque and emissions readings.
The optimum engine configuration produced an increase in peak power of 12kW (16hp), 23.5% greater than the standard engine in restricted format. In addition, the torque curve was significantly improved with 90% of the peak engine torque available over the useful speed range of 6,000 - 12,000rpm. This provides progressive torque delivery and makes the engine much more suitable for FSAE and Formula Student applications.
CitationMcKee, R., McCullough, G., Cunningham, G., Taylor, J. et al., "Experimental Optimisation of Manifold and Camshaft Geometries for a Restricted 600cc Four-Cylinder Four-Stroke Engine," SAE Technical Paper 2006-32-0070, 2006, https://doi.org/10.4271/2006-32-0070.
- VIRTUAL ENGINES Engine Simulation Software Optimum Power Technology www.optimum-power.com
- Jawad B.A. DeGain M.D. Young A.P. Jr. “Design of a Restricted Induction System for a High Speed Four Cylinder Engine” SAE Paper No. 2000-01-3090
- Jawad B.A. Hoste J.P. Johnson B.E. “Intake System Design for a Formula SAE Application” SAE Paper No. 2001-01-2553
- Jawad B.A. Hoste J.P. Johnson B.E. “Formula SAE Dual Plenum Induction System Design” SAE Paper No. 2002-01-0457
- Jawad B. Biggs C. Klein B. “Exhaust System Design for a Four Cylinder Engine” SAE 2002-01-3316
- Jawad B. Dragoiu A. Dyar L. Zellner K. Riedel C. “Intake Design for Maximum Performance” SAE Paper No. 2003-01-2277
- Blair G.P. “Breathing Easy” Race Engine Technology 1 2 Autumn 2003 46 51 1740-6803
- Blair G.P. “Catching Breath” Race Engine Technology 1 3 Winter 2003 50 58 1740-6803
- Blair G.P. “Design and Simulation of Four-Stroke Engines” Society of Automotive Engineers 1999
- Winterbone D.E. Pearson R.J. “Design Techniques for Engine Manifolds - Wave Action Methods for IC Engines” SAE International 1999
- Heywood J.B. “Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals” McGraw-Hill 1988
- Stone R. “Introduction to Internal Combustion Engines” Third Society of Automotive Engineers
- Taylor J. McKee R. McCullough G. Cunningham G. McCartan C. “Computer Simulation and Optimisation of an Intake Camshaft for a Restricted 600cc, 4-Stroke Engine” SAE Paper No. 2006-32-0071
- Plint M. Martyr A.J. “Engine Testing: Theory and Practice” Second Butterworth Heinemann 1999