This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Biomechanical Response of the Pediatric Abdomen, Part 1: Development of an Experimental Model and Quantification of Structural Response to Dynamic Belt Loading
Published November 06, 2006 by The Stapp Association in United States
Annotation ability available
The abdomen is the second most commonly injured region in children using adult seat belts, but engineers are limited in their efforts to design systems that mitigate these injuries since no current pediatric dummy has the capability to quantify injury risk from loading to the abdomen. This paper develops a porcine (sus scrofa domestica) model of the 6-year-old human's abdomen, and then defines the biomechanical response of this abdominal model. First, a detailed abdominal necropsy study was undertaken, which involved collecting a series of anthropometric measurements and organ masses on 25 swine, ranging in age from 14 to 429 days (4-101 kg mass). These were then compared to the corresponding human quantities to identify the best porcine representation of a 6-year-old human's abdomen. This was determined to be a pig of age 77 days, and whole-body mass of 21.4 kg. The sub-injury, quasistatic response to belt loading of this porcine model compared well with pediatric human volunteer tests performed with a lap belt on the lower abdomen. A test fixture was designed to produce transverse, dynamic belt loading on the porcine abdomen. A detailed review of field cases identified the following test variables: loading location (upper/lower), penetration magnitude (23%-68% of initial abdominal depth), muscle tensing (yes/no), and belt penetration rate (quasistatic, dynamic 2.9 m/s - 7.8 m/s). Dynamic tests were performed on 47 post-mortem subjects. Belt tension and dorsal reaction force were cross-plotted with abdominal penetration to generate structural response corridors. Subcutaneous stimulation of the anterior abdominal muscle wall stiffened the quasistatic response significantly, but was of negligible importance in the dynamic tests. The upper abdomen exhibited stiffer response quasistatically, and also was more sensitive to penetration rate, with stiffness increasing significantly over the range of dynamic rates tested here. In contrast, the lower abdomen was relatively rate insensitive. To our knowledge, this is the only dynamic structural characterization study on a comprehensively developed experimental model of the 6-year-old human abdomen. The structural corridors developed here should lead to the development of both mechanical (i.e., crash dummies) and computational pediatric models that are more useful for assessing injurious levels of belt penetration into the abdomen.
- Richard Kent - Center for Applied Biomechanics, University of Virginia
- Stephen Stacey - Center for Applied Biomechanics, University of Virginia
- Matthew Kindig - Center for Applied Biomechanics, University of Virginia
- Jason Forman - Center for Applied Biomechanics, University of Virginia
- William Woods - Center for Applied Biomechanics, University of Virginia
- Stephen W. Rouhana - Ford Motor Company
- Kazuo Higuchi - Takata Corporation
- Hiromasa Tanji - Takata Corporation
- Schuyler St. Lawrence - Takata Corporation
- Kristy B. Arbogast - Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
CitationKent, R., Stacey, S., Kindig, M., Forman, J. et al., "Biomechanical Response of the Pediatric Abdomen, Part 1: Development of an Experimental Model and Quantification of Structural Response to Dynamic Belt Loading," SAE Technical Paper 2006-22-0001, 2006, https://doi.org/10.4271/2006-22-0001.
- Aldman B., Anderson A., Saxmark O. Possible effects of air bag inflation on a standing child. Proceedings of IRCOBI, 1980.
- Arbogast K.B., Chen I., Nance ML, Durbin D. and Winston FK (2004). Predictors of pediatric abdominal injury risk. Stapp Car Crash Journal 48: 479-494.
- Arbogast K., Marigowda S., Kent R., Stacey S., Mattice J., Tanji H., Higuchi K., Rouhana S. (2005) Evaluating pediatric abdominal injuries. Proc. 19th Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, Washington DC.
- Arbogast K., Kent R., Ghati Y., Menon R., Durbin D. (2006) Mechanisms of abdominal organ injury in seat belt restrained children. J. Trauma (in press).
- Bergqvist D., Hedelin H., Lindblad B. and Matzsch T. (1985) Abdominal injuries in children: an analysis of 348 cases. Br J Accident Surgery 16: 217-220.
- Cavanaugh JM, Nyquist GW, Goldberg SJ, King AI. (1986) Lower abdominal tolerance and response. Proc. 30th Stapp Car Crash Conference.
- Chamouard F., Tarriere C., Baudrit P. (1996) Protection of children on board vehicles influence of pelvis design and thigh and abdomen stiffness on the submarining risk for dummies installed on a booster. Paper 96-S7-O-03. Proc. 15th Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV).
- Clauser C., Tucker P., McConville J., Churchill E., Laubach L., Reardon J. (1972) Anthropometry of Air Force women (Report No. AMRL-TR-70-5). Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio. (DTIC No. AD 743 113).
- Durbin DR., Arbogast KB and Moll EK (2001). Seat belt syndrome in children: a case report and review of the literature. Pediatr Emerg Care 17(6): 474-7.
- Dyce K., Sack W., Wensing C. (2002) Textbook of Veterinary Anatomy, 3rd Edition Elsevier, Philadelphia, PA.
- Garrett J. and Braunstein P. (1962). The seat belt syndrome. J Trauma 2: 220-238.
- Gogler E., Best A, Braess H., Burst H., Laschet G. Biomechanical experiments with animals on abdominal tolerance levels. Paper 770931, Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA, 1977.
- Gotschall C., Better A., Bulas D., Eichelberger M., Bents F. and Warner M. (1998). Injuries to children restrained in 2- and 3-point belts. 42nd Annual Meeting of the AAAM,.Charlottesville, VA.
- Gray H. (1995) Gray's Anatomy. Barnes and Noble Books,.New York, NY.
- Grunhofer H (1975) A review of anthropometric data of German Air Force and United States Air Force personnel (Report No. AGARD-AG-205).(DTIC No. AD-A010 674).
- Hardy W., Schneider L., Rouhana S. (2001) Abdominal impact response to rigid-bar, seatbelt, and airbag loading. Stapp Car Crash Journal 45:1-32.
- Hoy G. and Cole W. (1993). The paediatric cervical seat belt syndrome. Injury 24: 297-299.
- Ivarsson J., Crandall J., Longhitano D., Okamoto M. (2004) Lateral injury criteria for the 6-year-old pedestrian - Part I: criteria for the head, neck, thorax, abdomen and pelvis. Paper 2004-01-0323.Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA.
- Johannsen H., Alonzo F., Goubel C., Volker S. (2005) Abdominal injuries, injury criteria, injury severity levels and abdominal sensors for child dummies of the Q family. Proc. IRCOBI 2005:201-214.
- Kent R, Lessley D, Sherwood C (2004) Thoracic response to dynamic, non-impact loading from a hub, distributed belt, diagonal belt, and double diagonal belts. Stapp Car Crash Journal 48:495-519.
- Kent R., Bass D., Woods W., Salzar R., Lee S.-H., Melvin J. (2006) The role of muscle tensing on the force-deflection response of the thorax and a reassessment of frontal impact thoracic biofidelity corridors. Journal of Automobile Engineering, Proceedings of IMechE 220(D):853-868.
- Kerdok A., Ottensmeyer M., Howe R. (2006) Effects of perfusion on the viscoelastic characteristics of liver. J. Biomech. (in press).
- Kulowski K. and Rost W. (1956). Intra-abdominal injury from safety belts in auto accidents. Arch Surg 73: 970-971.
- Lane J (1994). The seat belt syndrome in children. Accid Anal & Prev 26: 813-820.
- Mattice J., Lau A., Oyen M., Kent R. (2006) Spherical indentation load-relaxation of soft biological tissues. Journal of Materials Research 21(8):2003-2010.
- McConville J., Clauser C., Churchill T., Cuzzi J., Kaleps I. (1980) Anthropometric relationships of body and body segment moments of inertia. (AFAMRL-TR-80-119), Air Force Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio.
- Mertz H., Driscoll G., Lenox J., Nyquist G., Weber D. Responses of various animals exposed to deployment of various passenger inflatable restraint system concepts for a variety of collision severities and animal positions. Proceedings of 9th ESV, 1982.
- Miller M. (1989) The biomechanical response of the lower abdomen to belt restraint loading. J. Trauma 29:1571-1584.
- Miller M. (1991a) The biomechanics of lower abdominal steering-wheel loading. J. Trauma 31:1301-1309.
- Miller M. (1991b) Tolerance to steering wheel-induced lower abdominal injury. J. Trauma 31:1332-1339.
- Nusholtz GS, Kaiker PS, Lehman RJ. Steering system abdominal impact trauma. UMTRI Report #88-19, 1988.
- Owings C., Chattin D., Snyder R., Norcutt R. (1975) Strength characteristics of U.S. children for product safety design. University of Michigan Final Report, #FDA-73-32, Prepared for CPSC, Bethesda, MD.
- Prasad P. and Daniel R. A biomechanical analysis of head, neck, and torso injuries to child surrogates due to sudden torso acceleration. Paper 841656, Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA, 1984.
- Rouhana SW, Elhagediab AM, Walbridge A, Hardy WN, Schneider LW (2001) Development of a Reusable, Rate-Sensitive Abdomen for the Hybrid III Family of Dummies. Stapp Car Crash Journal, 45: 1-10.
- Rouhana S. (2002) Biomechanics of Abdominal Trauma. In: Melvin J, Nahum A, eds Accidental Injury. New York: Springer Verlag :405-453.
- Rupp J., Klinich K., Moss S., Zou J., Pearlman M., Schneider L. (2001) Development and testing of a prototype pregnant abdomen for the small-female Hybrid III ATD. Stapp Car Crash Journal 45:61-78.
- Shaw C.G., Lessley D., Bolton J., Crandall J. (2004) Assessment of the THOR and Hybrid III crash dummies: steering wheel rim impacts to the upper abdomen. Paper 2004-01-0310, Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA.
- Smith J., Zhao J-B, Dou Y-L, Gregersen H. (2005) Time-dependent viscoelastic properties along rat small intestine. World J. Gastroenterol 11(32):4974-8.
- Snyder R., Schneider L., Owings C., Reynolds H., Golomb D., Sckork M (1977) Anthropometry of infants, children, and youths to age 18 for product safety design. UM-HSRI-77-17, CPSC, Bethesda, MD.
- Stalnaker R., McElhaney J., Roberts V., Human torso response to blunt trauma. in Human Impact Response Measurement and Simulation, pp.181-199. Plenum Press, New York, 1973.
- Stalnaker R.L., and Ulman M.S. (1985) Abdominal trauma - Review, response and criteria. Proc. 29th Stapp Car Crash Conference, pp.1-16. SAE, Warrendale, PA.
- Stocker J. and Dehner L. (2002) Pediatric Pathology. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA.
- Troiseille X., Cassan F. and Schrooten M. (2001). Child restraint system for children in cars - CREST results. 17th ESV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Trollope M., Stalnaker R., McElhaney J., Frey C. The mechanism of injury in blunt abdominal trauma. J. Trauma 13(11):962-970, 1973.
- Tso E,, Beaver B and Halter JA (1993). Abdominal injuries in restraint pediatric passengers. J Pediatric Surgery 28(7): 915-919.
- Winston FK, Chen IG, Elliott MR, Arbogast KB and Durbin DR (2004) Recent trends in child restraint practices in the United States. Pediatrics 113(5): e458-64.
- van Ratigen M., Twisk D., Schrooten M., Beusenberg M., Barnes A., Platten G. (1997) Biomechanically based design and performance targets for a 3-year old child crash dummy for frontal and side impact. Paper 973316, Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA.
- Viano D.C., Lau I.V., Asbury C., King A.I., and Begeman P.C. (1989) Biomechanics of the human chest, abdomen, and pelvis in lateral impact. Proc. 33rd Annual Meeting of the Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine, pp.367-382.AAAM, DesPlaines, IL.
- Young J, Chandler R, Snow C, Roginette K, Zehner G, Lofberg M (1983) Anthropometric and mass distribution characteristics of adult females. FAA-AM-83-16, Office of Aviation Medicine, Federal Aviation Administration, Oklahoma City, OK.