This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
An Original Comfort/Discomfort Quantification in a Bi-Variate Controlled Experiment: Application to the Discomfort Evaluation of Seated Arm Reach
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published July 04, 2006 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Each time the subject’s response in surveys is recorded with an ordered category scales, like annoyance in noise exposures or discomfort in ergonomics, one is interested by the numerisation in order to develop and to get a numerical response’s law. A meaningful and suitable method is the “successive intervals” of Adams and Messick, originated from Thurstone psychophysical ideas, and revisited following the general and performing measurement theory (Maurin 2003a,b). In case of one objective physical variable (or geometrical), one gets a contingency table crossing the response categories in columns and some controlled values of variables in rows. Then we get a uni-variate numerical law, as for example, comfort’s law of a pedal operation in terms of the seat height, pedal resistance or pedal travel (Wang & Maurin).
Here we generalise the successive interval for bi-variate situations. The same methodology provides the meaningful numerisation of responses in case of two input objective variables. In addition to this conjoint law, some statistical fine properties make it possible to explicit the interaction between variables. We apply this to analyse the categorical discomfort ratings of arm reach motions in relation to two variables, such as target’s orientation and distance, or target’s orientation and seat’s height (Chevalot & Wang).
The bi-variate results clearly show interesting features in conjoint law and interaction, which may probably not be so well revealed using a more crude quantitative method.
|Technical Paper||Quantitative Methods for Determining U.S. Air Force Crew Cushion Comfort|
|Technical Paper||Human Body Modeling for Virtual Seat Comfort Testing|
|Technical Paper||M-COMFORT: Scaling, Positioning and Improving a Human Model|
CitationMaurin, M., "An Original Comfort/Discomfort Quantification in a Bi-Variate Controlled Experiment: Application to the Discomfort Evaluation of Seated Arm Reach," SAE Technical Paper 2006-01-2347, 2006, https://doi.org/10.4271/2006-01-2347.
- Annett J. 2002 Subjective rating scales: science or art ? Egonomics 45 n°14 966 987
- Falmagne J.C. 1979 On a class of Probabilistic Conjoint Measurement models: some diagnostic properties J. Math. Psychology 19 73 88
- Feller W. 1971 An introduction to probability II J. Wiley
- Gell-Mann M. 1995 Le quark et le jaguar Flammarion
- Keeney R. L. 1992 Value-focused thinking Harvard Un. Press
- Luce R.D. Galanter E. 1963 a) Discrimination, b) Psychophysical scaling Luce, Bush, Galanter, Handbook of mathematical psychology 1 193 243 244 307 J. Wiley and sons
- Maurin M. 2003 Measures and measurement from data, advanced mathematical basements Young Researchers Seminar ECTRI-FERSI INRETS Lyon
- Maurin M. 2006 a Les réponses par échelles de catégories ordonnées, leur traitement numérique et la méthode des intervalles successifs 1 les situations uni-dimensionnées, rapport INRETS-LTE en préparation
- Maurin M. 2006 b Les réponses par échelles de catégories ordonnées, … 2 les extensions multivariées, rapport INRETS-LTE en préparation
- Roberts F.J. 1979 Measurement theory Reading Massachussetts Add. Wesley P. Co.
- Suppes P. Zinnes J.L. 1963 Basic measurement theory Luce, Bush, Galanter, Handbook of math. psychology 1 1 76 J. Wiley and sons
- Torgerson W.S. 1958 Theory and methods of scaling J. Wiley and sons
- Wang, X. Chevalot, N. 2003 Specification of Discomfort Assessment Models Deliverable D3.2 of the REALMAN project
- Wang X. Maurin M. 2003 Discomfort/comfort assessment using an ordered category scale IEA Congress Seoul