This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
“Fuel Flow Method2” for Estimating Aircraft Emissions
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published August 30, 2006 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
In recent years there has been increasing interest in quantifying the emissions from aircraft in order to generate inventories of emissions for climate models, technology and scenario studies, and inventories of emissions for airline fleets typically presented in environmental reports. The preferred method for calculating aircraft engine emissions of NOx, HC, and CO is the proprietary “P3T3” method. This method relies on proprietary airplane and engine performance models along with proprietary engine emissions characterizations. In response and in order to provide a transparent method for calculating aircraft engine emissions non proprietary fuel flow based methods 1,2,3 have been developed. This paper presents derivation, updates, and clarifications of the fuel flow method methodology known as “Fuel Flow Method 2”. While not as rigorous as the P3T3 method used for emissions certification, fuel flow methods can give reasonable approximations of emissions on the order of ± 10 to 15% for NOx as compared to the P3T3 method. In depth studies of variation for HC and CO have not been undertaken, though a limited examination of the data indicates a much broader spread, with a range on the low end similar to NOx, while up to almost a factor of two on the high end, depending on engine and thrust rating.
CitationDuBois, D. and Paynter*, G., "“Fuel Flow Method2” for Estimating Aircraft Emissions," SAE Technical Paper 2006-01-1987, 2006, https://doi.org/10.4271/2006-01-1987.
- Baughcum, Steven L.,Tritz, Terrance G., Henderson, Stephen C. and Pickett, David C., “Scheduled Civil Aircraft Emissions Inventories for 1992: Database Development and Analysis”, NASA Contractor Report 4700 Appendices C and D, April 1996.
- Sarli V J, Eiler D C and Marshall RL, 1975: .Effects of operating variables on gaseous emissions.. Proceedings of the Air Pollution Control Association Speciality Conference on Air Pollution Measurement Accuracy as it relates to Regulation Compliance. New Orleans,LA, October 26-28.
- NEPAIR G4RD-CT-2000-00182, Development of the technical basis for a New Emissions Parameter covering the whole AIRcraft operation: NEPAIR Final Technical Report NEPAIR/WP4/WPR/01, 10 September 2003.
- Kerrebrock, Jack L. “Aircraft Engines and Gas Turbines”, p78, The MIT Press, Cambridge Massachusetts, 1992.
- Hesse, W.J. and Mumford, N.V.S., “Jet Propulsion for Aerospace Applications,” 2nd Edition p309, Pitman Publishing Corporation, New York, 1964.
- Hill, Philip G., Peterson, Carl R.,“Mechanics and Themodynamics of Propulsion”, p48, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc., November 1970.
- “ICAO Aircraft Engine Emissions Databank”, Issue 14, June 06, 2005; Aircraft Environmental Section, Propulsion Department, Safety Regulation Group, Civil Aviation Authority, Aviation House, Gatwick Airport South, West Sussex, RH6 0YR, United Kingdom. Web address http://www.caa.co.uk/
- “Combined Report of the Certification and Technology Subgroups”, Page 12, ICAO/CAEP Working Group 3 (Emissions) Third Meeting, Bonn, Germany, June 1995, Defence Research Agency, Farnborough, Hampshire, GU14 6TD, U.K.
- Schulte P., Schlager H., Schumann U., Baughcum S. L., and Deidewig F., “NOx Emission Indices of Subsonic Wide-Bodied Jet Aircraft at Cruise Altitude: In situ Measurements and Predictions”, Journal of Geophysical Research 102, pp. 21431-21442 (1997) (done jointly with German DLR)
- Campos T.L., Weinheimer A.J., Zheng J., Montzka D.D., Walege J.G., Grahek F.E., Vay S.A., Collins, J.E. Jr., Wade L.O., Sachse G.W., Anderson B.E., Brune W.H., Tan D., Faloona I., Baughcum S.L., and Ridley B.A., “Measurement of NO and NOy emission indices during SUCCESS, Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 25, No. 10, Pages 1713-1716, May 15, 1998.