This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Comparison between Dynamic Condensation Techniques in Automotive Application
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 03, 2006 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
A comparison between two well-known dynamic condensation techniques, the Craig-Bampton reduction technique and the Serep methodology, is discussed in the present paper. These techniques are usually applied in order to characterize the dynamic behavior of automotive subsystems. An automotive exhaust pipeline is taken into account and, through a modal-geometrical selection criterion of master degrees of freedom, the dynamic reduction techniques are analytically tested and experimentally validated. Finally, their performances and limitations are pointed out.
CitationBonisoli, E., Delprete, C., and Rosso, C., "Comparison between Dynamic Condensation Techniques in Automotive Application," SAE Technical Paper 2006-01-1093, 2006, https://doi.org/10.4271/2006-01-1093.
- Craig, R. R., and Bampton, M. C. C., “Coupling of substructures for dynamic analyses”, AIAA Journal, Vol. 6, No. 7, pp. 1313-1319, 1968.
- Guyan, R. J., “Reduction of stiffness and mass matrices”, AIAA Journal, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 380, 1965.
- O'Callahan, J., Avitabile, P., and Riemer, R., “System equivalent reduction expansion process (SEREP)”, 7th IMAC, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA, 4-6 March, 1989, pp. 29-37.
- Meirovitch, L., Principles and techniques of vibrations, Prentice-Hall International Inc., New York, 1997.
- Maia, N. M. M., and Silva, J. M. M., Theoretical and experimental modal analysis, John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, 1997.
- Matta, K. W., “Selection of dofs for dynamic analysis”, Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, Vol. 109, No. 1, pp. 65-69, 1987.