This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Understanding Through-Thickness Integration in Springback Simulation
Technical Paper
2006-01-0147
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
The “adequate” number of integration points (NIP) required to achieve accurate springback simulation results is studied in this paper in an effort to clarify confusions reported in the literature and shed light on the origin of the confusion. A bending-under-tension model is adopted where springback solution can be obtained with analytical integration through metal thickness. Numerical integrations are then performed and compared with analytical solution to assess associated errors. A crucial distinction is made in the paper that, the model can be posed either as a displacement-value problem where both tension strain and bending radius are prescribed or as a mixed-value problem where the tension force and bending radius are prescribed. Although they are physically equivalent due to the uniqueness of solution, the numerical solutions are different. The associated errors in springback respond differently to the number of integration points employed. It is found that the mixed-value problem gives much smaller errors in springback than the displacement-value problem for the same numbers of integration points. The origin of the difference is examined in detail by analyzing requirements for stress distribution across thickness. Influence of tension force and bending radius is also investigated.
Recommended Content
Citation
Xia, Z. and Zeng, D., "Understanding Through-Thickness Integration in Springback Simulation," SAE Technical Paper 2006-01-0147, 2006, https://doi.org/10.4271/2006-01-0147.Also In
References
- Wagoner, R.H. Geng L.M. Li K.P. 1999 Simulation of Springback with the Draw/Bend Test, in IPMM’99: the Second International Conference on Intelligent Processing and Manufacturing of Materials Honolulu, HI, USA 91 104
- Li, K.P. Carden W.P. Wagoner R.H. 2002 Simulation of Springback Int. J. Mech. Sci. 44 103 122
- Andersson A. Holmberg S. 2002 Simulation and Verification of Different Parameters Effect on Springback Results NUMISHEET 2002, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference and Workshop on Numerical Simulation of 3D Sheet Forming Processes Yang D.Y. et al. Jeju Island, Korea 201 206
- Yamamura N. Kuwabara T. Makinouchi A. 2002 Springback Simulations for Stretch-bending and Draw-bending Processes Using the Static Explicit FEM Code, with An Algorithm for Canceling Non-Equilibrated Forces” NUMISHEET 2002, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference and Workshop on Numerical Simulation of 3D Sheet Forming Processes Yang D.Y. et al. Jeju Island, Korea 25 30
- Yao H. Liu, S-D. Du, C. Hu Y. 2002 Techniques to improve springback prediction accuracy using dynamic explicit FEA codes SAE Technical Paper 2002-01-0159 .
- Nguyen, V.T. Chen Z. Thomson P.F. 2004 Prediction of spring-back in anisotropic sheet metals J. Mech. Eng. Sci 218 651 661
- Xu, W.L. Ma, C.H. Li C.H. Feng W.J. 2004 Sensitive factors in springback simulation for sheet metal forming J. Mat. Proc. Tech 151 217 222
- Wagoner R.H. Li M. 2005 Advances in Springback NUMISHEET 2005, Proceedings of the 6th International Conference and Workshop on Numerical Simulation of 3D Sheet Forming Processes Smith L.M. Pourboghrat F. Yoon J.-W. Stoughton T.B. Detroit, Michigan 209 214
- Bronshtein I.N. Semendyayev K.A. 1985 Handbook of Mathematics Hirsch K.A. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company