This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Comparing the Performance of SunDiesel™ and Conventional Diesel in a Light-Duty Vehicle and Heavy-Duty Engine
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published October 24, 2005 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
SunDiesel fuel is a biomass-to-liquid (BTL) fuel that may have certain attributes different from conventional diesel. In this investigation, 100% SunDiesel was tested both in a Mercedes A-Class (MY1999) diesel vehicle and a single-cylinder heavy-duty compression-ignition direct-injection engine. The SunDiesel's emissions and fuel consumption were significantly better than conventional diesel fuel, especially in nitrogen oxides (NOx) reduction. In the vehicle U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Federal Test Procedure 75 (FTP-75), and New European Drive Cycle (NEDC) tests, the carbon dioxide emissions on a mile basis (g/mile) from SunDiesel fuel were almost 10% lower than the conventional diesel fuel. Similarly, in the single-cylinder engine steady-state tests, the reductions in brake specific NOx, carbon monoxide (CO), and particulate matter (PM) are equally significant. Combustion analysis, though not conclusive, indicates that there are differences deserving further research.
Since we were testing the two fuels back-to-back in the Mercedes A-class, the drivers were able to detect the subjective drivability improvement that SunDiesel has over conventional diesel fuel in less engine harshness and odor-free exhaust. Based on the test results, it is clear that SunDiesel definitely has some advantages compared to conventional diesel, but due to the limited amount of fuel available to Argonne National Laboratory for testing, additional experiments were not performed to reveal the less desirable attributes.
CitationNg, H., Biruduganti, M., and Stork, K., "Comparing the Performance of SunDiesel™ and Conventional Diesel in a Light-Duty Vehicle and Heavy-Duty Engine," SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-3776, 2005, https://doi.org/10.4271/2005-01-3776.
- Sheehan, J., Camobreco, V., Duffield, J., Graboski, M., and Shapouri H., “An Overview of Biodiesel and Petroleum Diesel Life Cycles,” NREL/TP-580-24772, 1998.
- USDA, “Synthetic Diesel May Play a Significant Role as Renewable Fuel in Germany,” USDA Newsletter, January 25, 2005.
- Forest, C. A. and Muzzell P.A., “Fischer-Tropsch: Why Are They of Interest to the United States Military,” SAE Paper 2005-01-1807.
- Barbour, R.H., Rickeard, D.J. and Elliott N.G., “Understanding Diesel Lubricity,” SAE Paper 2000-01-1918.
- “A Comprehensive Analysis of Biodiesel Impacts on Exhaust Emissions,” EPA 420-P-02-001, October 2002.
- Schubert, P.F., Russell, B.J., Freerks, R.L. and DeVore J.“Impact of Ultra-Clean Fischer-Tropsch Diesel Fuel on Emissions in a Light-Duty Passenger Car Diesel Engine,” SAE Paper 2002-01-2725.
- Abdul-Khalek, I.S., Kittleson, D., Graskow, B.R., Wei, Q., and Brear F., “Diesel Exhaust Particle Size: Measurement Issues and Trends,” SAE Paper 980525, 1998.
- Ng., H.K., and Borman, G.L.,“The Effects of Fuel Aromatic Structure on Diesel Combustion,” International Symposium on Diagnostics and Modeling of Reciprocating Engines, Tokyo, Japan, September 4-6, 1985.
- Ng., H.K., and Borman, G.L., “The Effects of Fuel Molecular Structure on Diesel Exhaust Particulates,” SAE P-138, p.338-346, 1983.
- Svensson, K.I., Richards, M.J., Mackrory, A.J., and Tree D.R., “Fuel Composition and Molecular Structure Effects on Soot Formation in Direct-Injection Flames Under Diesel Engine Conditions,” SAE 2005-01-0381.
- Tsunemoto, H., Ishitani, H., and Kaimai T., “Type Effect of Fuel Properties on Unburned HC and Particulate Matter Emissions in a Small DI Diesel Engine,” SAE 2001-01-3387.