This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
A Computational and Experimental Analysis of the Flow Around a Blunt-Base Vehicle
Technical Paper
2005-01-3626
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
This paper describes the results of experiments that were performed using a Ground Research Vehicle (GRV) at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration's (NASA) Dryden Flight Research Center in Edwards, CA and a comparison with computational results. The GRV is a modified 1984 General Motors (GMC) van and measures 40 feet long and 9 feet high, with a base area of 83 by 83, and it weighs 10260 lbs and holds a crew of up to three. Air data is measured from a nose-boom, 2 global positioning (GPS) units, and an absolute Honeywell Pressure Transducer with 4 Electronic Signal Processor (ESP) scanners and 64 surface pressure ports. This allows for detailed measurements of the surface pressure profiles around the vehicle. The total vehicle drag is estimated from coast-down tests, while the pressure component of the drag force may be calculated by integrating the pressure profiles on the front and base of the vehicle. The GRV is a variable-geometry vehicle, and three different configurations were studied experimentally at NASA-Dryden: the vehicle with square corners and the undercarriage both fared and un-fared, and the vehicle with the front edges and corners rounded with the undercarriage covered. For the computational work only the latter two configurations have been studied. Vehicle tests were performed at speeds varying from 40 mph to 80 mph. Both steady-flow and transient simulations were performed using the commercial computational fluid dynamics (CFD) code FLUENT running on SUN workstations. While the results from the steady flow simulations using a two-equation Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) turbulence model matched the experimental measurements of the pressure profiles on the front face of the vehicle well, they did not adequately capture the pressure profile on the base of the vehicle, due to the steady computations inability to capture the periodic vortex shedding. Transient computations using a Large Eddy Simulation (LES) turbulence model provided results in much closer agreement to the experimentally measured pressure profiles, which suggests that transient LES computations should always be performed when simulating drag of tractor-trailers and similar vehicles with blunt bases.
Recommended Content
Technical Paper | Large-Eddy Simulation of the Flow around Simplified Car Model |
Technical Paper | Computational Aeroacoustic Analysis of a Generic Side View Mirror |
Authors
Citation
Andrus, B. and Post, S., "A Computational and Experimental Analysis of the Flow Around a Blunt-Base Vehicle," SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-3626, 2005, https://doi.org/10.4271/2005-01-3626.Also In
Heavy Vehicle Drag Reduction-Overviews, Multiple Trailer-Mounted Devices; Tires, Splash and Spray and Emissions; Full Scale Assessments
Number: SP-1985; Published: 2005-11-01
Number: SP-1985; Published: 2005-11-01
References
- Whitmore, S. Sprague, S. Naughton, J. “Wind-Tunnel Investigations of Blunt-Body Drag Reduction Using Forebody Surface Roughness” 2001
- Walston, W. Buckley, F. Marks, C. “Test Procedures for the Evaluation of Aerodynamic Drag on Full-Scale Vehicles in Windy Environments” SAE Paper 760106
- Saltzman, Ed Meyer, Robert “A Reassessment of Heavy-Duty Truck Aerodynamic Design Features and Priorities,” June 1999
- Hoerner, Sighard F. “Fluid-Dynamic Drag: Practical Information on Aerodynamic Drag and Hydrodynamic Resistance,” Self-Published Work Washington D.C. 1965
- McCallen, R. Couch, R. Hsu, J. Browland, F. Hammache, M. Leonard, A. Brady, M. Salari, K. Rutledge, W. Ross, J. Storms, B. Heinbeck, J. Driver, D. Bell, J. Zilliac, G. “Progress in Reducing Aerodynamic Drag for Higher Efficiency of Heavy Duty Trucks (Class 7-8)” SAE Paper 1999-01-2238
- McCallen, R. Couch, R. Hsu, J. Browland, F. Hammache, M. Leonard, A. Brady, M. Salari, K. Rutledge, W. Ross, J. Storms, B. Heinbeck, J. Driver, D. Bell, J. Zilliac, G. “Aerodynamic Drag of Heavy Vehicles (Class 7-8): Simulation and Benchmarking” SAE Paper 2000-01-2209
- Coon, J. Visser, K. “Drag Reduction of a Tractor-Trailer Using Planar Boat Tail Plates” The Aerodynamics of Heavy Vehicles 19 2004
- Diebler, Corey Smith, Mark “A Ground-Based Research Vehicle for Base Drag Studies at Subsonic Speeds,” Nov. 2002
- “FLUENT 6.1 Documentation.” Copyright Fluent Inc. Jan. 28 2003
- Sovani, Sandeep Personal Communication. Technical Support Engineer Automotive Industry Team. Fluent Inc. Ann Arbor, MI 2004-2005
- Khondge, A. Sovani, S. Lokhande, B. Jain, S. Long, M. “Simulation of the Flow-Field Around a Generic Tractor-Trailer Truck” SAE Paper 2004-01-1147
- Axelsson, N. Ramnefors, M. Gustafsson, R. “Accuracy in Computational Aerodynamics Part 1: Stagnation Pressure” SAE Paper 980037 1998
- MATLAB 5 The Math Works Inc. Natick, MA 1997