Supersonic Business Jet Design and Requirements Exploration using Multiobjective Interactive Genetic Algorithms

Authors

• Michael Buonanno - Georgia Institute of Technology
• Dimitri N. Mavris - Georgia Institute of Technology

Topic

• Market research
• Mathematical models

Citation

Also In

References

1. Federal Aviation Administration Supersonic aircraft noise 2004 http://www.faa.gov/about/office5Fnoise/
2. Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board Commercial Supersonic Technology: The Way Ahead National Academies Press Washington, D.C. 2001
3. National Air and Space Administration Vehicle systems program homepage 2005 http://www.aeronautics.nasa.gov/vsp/
4. Biles J. Anderson P. Loggi W. Neural network fitness functions for a musical iga 1996
5. Aronstein D. Clean-sheet design and initial optimization in non-traditional multidisciplinary design problems 10th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference January 2005
6. Bentley P. Evolutionary Design by Computers Morgan Kaufmann San Francisco, CA 1999
7. Biles J. Genjam: A genetic algorithm for generating jazz solos ICMC’94 Aarhus Denmark 1994
8. Bruner. H. S. Ssbj: A technical challenge ICAO Journal August 1991
9. Buonanno M. Mavris. D. A new method for aircraft concept selection using interactive multiobjective genetic algorithms 43nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit Reno, NV 2005 AIAA
10. Michael Buonanno A method for aircraft concept exploration using interactive genetic algorithms 2005
11. Coen P. Development of a computer technique for the prediction of transport aircraft flight profile sonic boom signatures The George Washington University 1991
12. AIAA MDO Technical Committee Current state of the art on multidisciplinary design optimization (mdo) American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics September 1991
13. Dawkins R. The Blind Watchmaker Longman Essex, U.K. 1986
14. Deb K. Multi-Objective Optimization using Evolutionary Algorithms Wiley and Sons. inc. West Sussex, U.K. 2002
15. Deb Kalyanmoy Agrawal Samir Pratab Amrit Meyarivan T. A Fast Elitist Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm for Multi-Objective Optimization: NSGA-II Schoenauer Marc Deb Kalyanmoy Rudolph Günter Yao Xin Lutton Evelyne Merelo J. J. Schwefel Hans-Paul Proceedings of the Parallel Problem Solving from Nature VI Conference 849 858 Paris, France 2000 Springer
16. Dieter G. Engineering Design McGraw Hill Inc. New York, NY 2000
17. Komadina S. Drake A. Bruner S. Development of a quiet supersonic aircraft with technology applications to military and civil aircraft American Instiitute of Aeronautics and Astronautics January 2002
18. Geoffrion A. M. Dyer J. S. Feinberg A. An interactive approach for multi-criterion optimization with an application to the operation of an academic department Management Science 19 (4) 1972
19. Esbensen. H. Explorer: An interactive floorplanner for design space exploration European Design Automation Conference Geneva, Switzerland 1996
20. Briceno S. Buonanno M. Fernandez I. Mavris D. A parametric exploration of supersonic business jet concepts utilizing response surfaces Technical report, AIAA Aviation, Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference 2002
21. Inoue T. Furuhashi T. Fujii M Development of a nurse scheduling support system using interactive ea IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 5 1999
22. Goldberg D. Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning Addison Wesley 1989
23. Plotkin K. Grandi F. Computer models for sonic boom analysis: Pcboom4, caboom, boomap, corboom Wyle Labs 2002
24. Harris R. An analysis correlation of aircraft wave drag National Air and Space Administration March 1964
25. Yu-Chi Ho An explanation of ordinal optimization: Soft computing for hard problems Information Sciences 113 1999
26. Holland J. Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence MIT Press Cambridge, MA 1992
27. Hisao Ishibuchi Youhei Shibata An empirical study on the effect of mating restriction on the search ability of emo algorithms EMO 433 447 2003
28. Vineet Khare Performance scaling of multi-objective evolutionary algorithms
29. Kim H. Cho. S. Application of interactive genetic algorithm to fashion design Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 13 (6) 2000
30. Kroo I. Aircraft Design: Synthesis and Analysis Desktop Aeronautics Stanford, CA 2004
31. Leatherwood J. Sullivan B. Laboratory study of effects of sonic boom shaping on subjective loudness and acceptability NASA 1992
32. Lyman V. Morgenstern J. Calculated and measured pressure fields for an aircraft designed for sonic-boom alleviation American Instiitute of Aeronautics and Astronautics August 2004
33. Bandte O. Malinchik S. A broad and narrow approach to interactive evolutionary design an aircraft design example Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3103 2004
34. Mattson C. Messac. A. Concept selection using s-pareto frontiers AIAA Journal 41 6 2003
35. McCullers A. Flight optimization system 2001 NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA
36. Meisel W. L. Multiple Criteria Decision Making USC Press Columbia, SC 1973
37. Middleton W. Lundry L. A system of aerodynamic design and analysis of supersonic aircraft National Air and Space Administration 1980
38. Mark Moore Vehicle sketch pad documentation 2004
39. Hiroaki Nishino Hideyuki Takagi Sung-Bae Cho Kouichi Utsumiya A 3d modeling system for creative design ICOIN 479 486 2001
40. Nowostawski M. Poli R. Parallel genetic algorithm taxonomy 1999
41. Carlson H. Chu J. Ozoroski L. McCullers A. Guide to aero2s and wingdes computer codes for prediction and minimization of drag due to lift National Air and Space Administration November 1980
42. Parmee. I. Genetic algorithms and hydropower system design Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 13 (1) 1998
43. Rallabhandi S. Sonic Boom Minimization through Vehicle Shape Optimization and Probabilistic Acoustic Propagation Georgia Institute of Technology 2005
44. Raymer D. Aircraft Design: A Conceptual Approach American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Washington, D.C. 1992
45. Salas A. O. Walsh J. L. Mason B. H. Weston R. P. Townsend J. C. Samareh J. A. Green L. L. Hsct4.0 application - software requirements specification National Air and Space Administration May 2001
46. Schaffer J. David Multiple objective optimization with vector evaluated genetic algorithms Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Genetic Algorithms 93 100 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. 1985
47. Schrage D. Concurrent Engineering: Automation, Tools, and Techniques John Wiley and Sons 1993
48. Spears W. M. The Role of Mutation and Recombination in Evolutionary Algorithms The George Mason University 1998
49. Stevens. S. Perceived level of noise by mark vii and decibels J. Acoust. Soc. America 51 2 Feb 1972
50. Sweetman B. Whooshhh! Popular Science July 2004
51. Takagi. H. Interactive evolutionary computation: Fusion of the capacities of ec optimization and human evaluation Proceedings of the IEEE 89 9 2001
52. Takagi H. Ohya. K. Discrete fitness values for improving the human interface in interactive ga ICEC’96 Aichi Japan 1996
53. Parmee I. Cvetkovic D. Watson A. Bonha C. Multi-objective satrisfaction within an interactive evolutionary design environment Journal of Evolutionary Computation 8 2 2000
54. Wiecek C. Zhang M. Quality utility: A compromise programming approach to robust design 1999
55. Wlezien R. Veitch L. The darpa quiet supersonic platform program AIAA 2002
56. Wolz R. A summary of recent supersonic vehicle studies at gulfstream aerospace American Instiitute of Aeronautics and Astronautics January 2003
57. Zitzler Eckart Laumanns Marco Thiele L. SPEA2: Improving the Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm Switzerland 2001

Cited By