This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Small Occupant Dynamics in the Rear Seat: Influence of Impact Angle and Belt Restraint Design
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 11, 2005 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Catastrophic head and spinal injuries have been reported to older children, properly restrained in the back seats of motor vehicles. The interaction of small stature occupants in contemporary, rear restraint systems has not yet been reported in controlled frontal oblique sled test conditions. Such data is fundamental to understanding potential mechanisms of injuries and effective countermeasures.
The purpose of this study was three fold: (1) to conduct a series of controlled sled tests to determine the critical angle at which torso roll-out from the shoulder belt occurs in 6 year old Hybrid III (H3-6C) and 5th percentile female Hybrid III (H3-5F) dummies, (2) to compare dummy injury measures to the standard Injury Assessment Reference Values (IARVs) as a function of impact angle, and (3) to assess the influence of belt pretensioners and anchorage geometry as countermeasures to submarining and torso rollout dummy kinematics.
A series of sled tests were conducted from 0 to 60 degrees in 15 degree increments on a rebound sled at velocities of approximately 35 kph. The dummies were positioned in the right (far-side) outboard seats of a sled buck constructed from a late 1990's model year large SUV.
The second row seat was initially fitted with an OEM adjustable upper belt anchorage and C-pillar mounted retractor. The third row restraint system included a fixed upper anchorage with an OEM roof-rail mounted retractor.
Kinematic targets were mounted on the dummies' head, shoulder and pelvis. Test instrumentation included: lap and shoulder belt load transducers, triaxial accelerometers at the center of gravity of the head, triaxial accelerometers and a deflection gauge in the chest, and a six-axis force (and moment) transducer in the upper neck of the dummy. Tests were digitally recorded at 1000 frames per second using high speed digital video cameras placed around the test fixture. Cameras were set up on the left side of the buck for video analysis. In addition, pre- and post test images were taken using still digital photography. Sensor signals were filtered according to SAE specifications.
The kinematic data was compared to the earlier work of Horsch (1980) that reported the shoulder belt retained the upper body of a 50th percentile male dummy for impact angles up to 45 degrees. Moreover, he reported for mid-size male dummies, “…significant kinetic energy was removed from the upper body before escape, even for full lateral deceleration.” In contrast, this study revealed that H3-6C and H3-5F dummies began to roll out of their shoulder belt at 15 and 30 degrees, respectively. Complete loss of torso support was seen at 45 degrees without significant kinetic energy dissipation.
A retractor pretensioner with 7 ms fire time prevented torso rollover of the H3-6C child dummy at impact angles up to and including 45 degrees. Elimination of submarining kinematics for the H3-5F; however, required significant modification of the OEM belt system's inboard buckle and anchorage geometry, even in the presence of a retractor pretensioner.
CitationBidez, M., Hauschild, H., Mergl, K., and Syson, S., "Small Occupant Dynamics in the Rear Seat: Influence of Impact Angle and Belt Restraint Design ," SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-1708, 2005, https://doi.org/10.4271/2005-01-1708.
- Agran, P.F. “Traumatic Injuries Among Children Using Lap Belts and Lap/Shoulder Belts in Motor Vehicle Collisions.” 31st Annual Proceedings of the AAAM; New Orleans, LA; September 28-30, 1987.
- Agran, P.F. and Winn, D.G. “Injuries Among 4 to 9 year old Restrained Motor Vehicle Occupants by Seat Location and Crash Impact Site.” 32nd Annual Proceedings of the AAAM; Seattle, WA; September 12-14, pp. 39-51,1988.
- Agran, Phyllis F.; Anderson, Craig L. and Winn, Diane G., “Restraint Use Among Children in Fatal Crashes,” Society of Automotive Engineers, Paper No. 973300, 1997.
- Anund, Anna, et al, “Child safety in cars-Literature review,” Swedish National Road and Transportation Research Laboratories, Report 489A, 2003.
- Bidez, M.W. and Syson, S.R. “Kinematics, Injury Mechanism and Design Considerations for Older Children in Adult Torso Belts.” SAE Paper No. 2001-01-0173.
- Bidez, M.W., Hauschild, H.W. and Syson, S.R. “Lap- Shoulder Belt Performance as a Function of Occupant Size.” Accepted for publication, 2005 Society of Automotive Engineers.
- Cavanaugh, J.M., Huang, Y., Zhu, Y., King, A.I. “Regional Tolerance of the shoulder thorax, abdomen and pelvis to padding in side impact.” SAE 930435, 1993.
- Cavanaugh, J.M., Nyquist, G.W., Goldberg, S.J., King, A.I. “Lower Abdominal Tolerance and Response.” Proceedings of the 30th Stapp Car Crash Conference, pp.41-63, 1986.
- Cavanaugh, J. M.; Zhu, Y., Huang, Y., King, A. “Injury and Response of the Thorax in Side Impact Cadaveric Tests. Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Stapp Car Crash Conference, pp. 199-222, Society of Automotive Engineers, 1993.
- Gotschall, CS, Better, AI, Bulas, D, Eichelberger, Bentz, F and Warner, M. “Injuries to Children Restrained in 2- and 3-Point Belts.” 42nd Annual Proceedings of the AAAM, October 5-7, 1998.
- Hall, James, “Remarks before the National Association for Pupil Transportation,” November 2, 1998.
- Henderson, M.; Brown, J. and Paine, M. “Injuries to Restrained Children” Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of the Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine; Lyon, France, pp. 75- 87, September 21-23, 1994.
- Henderson, M.; Brown, J. and Griffiths, M. “Children in Adult Seat Belts and Child Harnesses.” Final Report, Federal Office of Road Safety, Department of Transport and Communications, Canberra, 1997.
- Horsch, J.D. “Occupant Dynamics as a Function of Impact Angle and Belt Restraint,” SAE Paper No. 801310, 1980.
- Howard, A.W., “Automobile restraints for children: a review for clinicians,” Canadian Medical Association Journal, October 1, 2002.
- Klinich, K.D. and Burton, R.W. “Injury Patterns of Older Children in Automotive Accidents,” SAE 933082, 1993.
- Lundell, B., et al, “Improving Rear Seat Safety - A Continuing Process,” 13th International Conference on ESV's, November 1991.
- Malott, A., et al, “Sled Test Results Using the 6 Year Old: An Evaluation of Various Restraints and Crash Configurations,” SAE Paper No. 2004-01-0316, 2004.
- Mertz, H. J., P; Irwin, AL (1997). “Injury Risk Curves for Children and Adults in Frontal and Rear Collisions.” SAE 973318: 13-30, 1997.
- Mertz, H.J. and Prasad, P. “Biomechanical and Scaling Bases for Frontal and Side Impact Injury Assessment Reference Values” Stapp Car Crash Journal, 47:155-188, 2003
- Miller, M.A. “The Biomechanical Response of the Lower Abdomen to Belt Restraint Loading.” J. Trauma, 29(11):1571-1584, 1989.
- Molz, F.J., George, P.D., Go, L.S., Bidez, M.W., King, A.I.and Alonso, J. “Simulated Automotive Side Impact on the Isolated Human Pelvis” Proceedings of the Forty-First Stapp Car Crash Conference, pp. 75-90, 1997.
- NHTSA; DOT Report HS 809 671, “Misuse of Child Restraints” by Decina and Lococo; January, 2004.
- Padmanaban, J. and Ray, R. M. “Safety Performance of Rear Seat Occupant Restraint Systems” Proceedings of the Thirty-Sixth Stapp Car Crash Conference, pp. 193-201, 1992.
- Pintar, F., Yoganandan, N., Sances, A., Eppinger, R. “Instrumentation of Human Surrogates for Side Impact. Proceedings of the Fortieth Stapp Car Crash Conference, pp. 29-42, Society of Automotive Engineers, 1996.
- Pintar, F. Yoganandan, N., Hines, M., Maltese, M., McFadden, J., Saul, R., Eppinger, R., Khaewpong, N., Kleinberger, M. “Chestband Analysis of Human Tolerance to Side Impact. Proceedings of the Forty-First Stapp Car Crash Conference, pp. 63-74, Society of Automotive Engineers, 1997.
- Slavik, DH: “Cervical Distraction Injuries to Children” SAE 973306, 1997.
- Stucki, Lee and Galganski, Robert A., “Safety Performance Improvement of Production Belt System Assemblies,” SAE Paper No. 870654, 1987
- Talantikite Y, Brun-Cassan F, Lecoz J-Y, Tarriere C. “Abdominal injury protection in side impact - injury mechanisms and protection criteria.” Proceedings of the International IRCOBI, pp. 131-144, 1993.
- Van Rooij, Lex, et al, “The Effects of Vehicle Seat Belt Parameters on the Injury Risk for Children in Booster Seats,” SAE Paper No. 2003-01-0500, 2003.
- Viano, D.C. and Sudhakar, A., “Assessing the Safety Performance of Occupant Restraint Systems,” Society of Automotive Engineers Paper No. 902328, November 1990.
- Walsh, Michael J. and Kelleher, Barbara J., “Development of a Preloaded Force-Limited Passive Belt System for Small Cars,” SAE Paper No. 800300, February 25-29, 1980.
- Weissner, Rudiger, “A Comparison of Advanced Belt Systems Regarding Their Effectiveness,” SAE Paper No. 780414, February 27-March 3, 1978.
- Willumeit, H.-P., “Passive Preloaded Energy-Absorbing Seat Belt System,” SAE Paper No. 720433, May 22-25, 1972.
- Zawisa, K.M., et al, “Rear Seat Shoulder Belt Guide,” United States Patent No. 5,308,116, May 3, 1994.
- Zellmer, H., Luhrs, S. and Bruggemann, K., “Optimized Restraint Systems for Rear Seat Passengers,” 15th ESV Conference, 98-S1-W-23, 1998.