This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Development of a New Composite School Bus Test Cycle and the Effect of Fuel Type on Mobile Emissions from Three School Buses
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 11, 2005 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
The New Jersey Department of Transportation (NJDOT) is currently sponsoring a research study at Rowan University to develop strategies for reducing diesel emissions from mobile sources such as school buses and class 8 trucks. This paper presents the results of mobile school bus testing that has been performed to quantify the emission reduction capabilities of various alternative fuels, such as B20/#2 diesel, ultra low sulfur diesel (ULSD), and B20/ULSD, when applied to school buses that are representative of those currently in use in the state of NJ. Three school buses equipped with an International T444E, an International DT466E, and a Cummins 5.9L ISB engine were instrumented and tested at the Aberdeen Test Center at the Aberdeen Proving Grounds in Maryland. Exhaust gas emission measurements were made using a Semtech-D mobile emissions analyzer to measure CO, CO2, NO2, NO, O2, and unburned hydrocarbons, along with a Sensors PM-300 to measure PM. In addition to the exhaust emissions measurements, operating parameters such as instantaneous vehicle speed, engine speed, percent load and fuel flow rate were acquired from the engine electronic control module (ECM) during testing. To ensure repeatability of testing under conditions that accurately reproduce actual school bus operating conditions, a new composite mobile school bus cycle was developed. The cycle was developed by acquiring Global Positioning System (GPS) data from actual school bus routes from 5 different municipalities within the state of New Jersey. For all three buses, HC emissions were significantly reduced for each of the three alternative fuels tested. Emission reductions of NOx, PM and CO varied for each bus tested. For example, both the ULSD and the B20/#2 diesel blend reduced CO and PM emissions by over 30% for the T444E and Cummins engines. The ULSD/B20 blend reduced CO and PM emissions by 20% to 50% for the T444E and DT466E engines. Generally, the B20 blends resulted in slight increases in NOx emissions, with the exception of the DT466E engine with B20/ULSD blend, which resulted in decreased NOx emissions.
CitationHearne, J., Toback, A., Akers, J., Hesketh, R. et al., "Development of a New Composite School Bus Test Cycle and the Effect of Fuel Type on Mobile Emissions from Three School Buses," SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-1616, 2005, https://doi.org/10.4271/2005-01-1616.
- School Bus Safety: Crash Worthiness Research 2002 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) April 2002
- http://www.epa.gov/otaq/schoolbus/basicinfo.htm August 25 2003
- A Comprehensive Analysis of Biodiesel Impacts on Exhaust Emissions 2002 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Oct. 2002
- The Puget Sound Clean Cities Coalition, Comparison to Biodiesel and Ultra Low Sulfur Diesel http://www.pugetsoundcleancities.org/Biodiesel2.htm August 25 2003
- Emissions Standards Applicability and Test Cycles http://www.dieselnet.com/standards/us/hd.html August 25 2003
- Toback, A.T. Hearne, J.S. Colligan, S. Osorio, I Hesketh, R.P. Marchese, A.J. 2005 Experimental Evaluation of Aftertreatment Devices on Mobile School Bus Emissions from Diesel Powered School Buses 2005 SAE World Congress Submitted
- Semtech-D Operator's Manual Sensors, Inc.
- PM-300 Operator's Manual Sensors, Inc.
- Davies, S. Sparks, S. Donnelly, J. 1999 Identification of Typical Drive Cycles for Diesel Vehicles: Final Report CSIRO Mathematical and Informational Science Macquarie University Campus Feb 1999
- Urban and Rural Population & Housing Units New Jersey, Counties, and Municipalities 2000 New Jersey State Data Center April 2003
- Krause, S.R. Merrion, D.F. Green, G.L. 1973 Effect of Inlet Air Humidity and Temperature on Diesel Exhaust Emissions SAE Paper # 730213
- Toback, A.T. Hearne, J.S. Hesketh, R.P. Marchese, A.J. 2004 The Effect of Ambient Temperature and Humidity on Idling Emissions from Diesel School Buses SAE 2004-01-1087
- Virtanen, A. 2002 Effective density of diesel exhaust particles as a function of size SAE 2002-01-0056
- Kittelson, D.B. Watts W.F. Johnson J. 2002 “Diesel Aerosol Sampling Methodology - CRC E-43: Final Report” University of Minnesota Report for the Coordinating Research Council 19 August 2002
- Frank, B. P. Tang S. Lanni T. Rideout G. Beregszaszy C. Meyer N. Chatterjee S. Conway R. Lowell D. Bush C. Evans J. 2004 A Study of the Effects of Fuel Type and Emission Control Systems on Regulated Gaseous Emissions from Heavy-Duty Diesel Engines SAE 2004-01-1085