This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Transient Performance of Diesel Particulate Filters as Measured by an Engine Exhaust Particle Size Spectrometer
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 11, 2005 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
The performance of diesel particulate filters (DPF) has historically been evaluated by gravimetric efficiency, which measures the mass of particulate matter (PM) trapped in the filters. This method does not measure the filtration efficiency at different PM size ranges and, therefore, cannot provide information on fractional performance of DPFs. This fact becomes significant because the adverse effects of diesel PM emissions on human health and the environment are size dependent. A previous study investigated the fractional performance of DPFs under steady state conditions using a scanning mobility particle sizer (SMPS). In the real world, however, nearly all engines operate under transient conditions. DPFs also have to perform under such conditions, so any measurement of performance must be able to react to quickly changing DPF conditions.
This study investigates the PM emission pattern of a diesel engine and the performances of a diesel oxidation catalyst (DOC) and various wall-flow DPFs under transient conditions. The emission levels were measured with and without the aftertreatment devices in place utilizing an engine exhaust particle size spectrometer (EEPS), along with other classifying instruments. The fractional performances of the DOC and DPFs were characterized at certain points throughout the transient cycle. It was observed that the size distribution of engine-out PM emissions could be either mono- or bi-modal with the peak able to switch quickly between the nuclei and accumulation modes during a transient operation. A PM penetration pattern was found to be closely associated with engine-out PM emissions, especially for accumulation mode particles, though efficiency of the DPF was greater than 99% after loading. Therefore, if an engine's PM output cannot be reduced, the best method to further decrease total PM mass emissions is to improve the removal efficiency of accumulation mode particles by aftertreatment devices.
CitationLiu, Z., Thurow, E., Caldow, R., and Johnson, T., "Transient Performance of Diesel Particulate Filters as Measured by an Engine Exhaust Particle Size Spectrometer," SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-0185, 2005, https://doi.org/10.4271/2005-01-0185.
SAE 2005 Transactions Journal of Fuels and Lubricants
Number: V114-4; Published: 2006-02-01
Number: V114-4; Published: 2006-02-01
- Ichikawa, S. Uchida Y. Otsuka A. Harada T. Hamanaka T. Nagashima K. Nagata M. “Material Development of High Porous SiC for Catalyzed Diesel Particulate Filters,” SAE 2003-01-0380 2003
- Young, D. M. Warren C. J. Gadkaree K. P. Johannesen L. “Silicon Carbide for Diesel Particulate Filter Applications: Material Development and Thermal Design,” SAE 2002-01-0324 2002
- Liu, Z. G. Skemp M. D. Lincoln J. C. “Diesel Particulate Filters: Trends and Implications of Particle Size Distribution Measurement,” SAE 2003-01-0046 Diesel Exhaust Emissions Control SAE SP- 1754 83 96 2003 SAE Transactions: J. Fuels and Lubricants 80 93 2003
- Suresh, A. Khan A. Johnson J. H. “An Experimental and Modeling Study of Cordierite Traps - Pressure Drop and Permeability of Clean and Particulate Loaded Traps,” SAE 2000-01-0476 Diesel Exhaust Aftertreatment SAE SP-1497 2000
- Eastwood, P. “Critical Topics in Exhaust Gas Aftertreatment,” Research Studies Press Ltd. 2001
- Bagely, S. T. Baumgard K. J. Gratz L. D. Johnson J. H. Leddy D. G. “Characterization of Fuel and Aftertreatment Devices Effects on Diesel Emissions,” Health Effect Institute, Research Report Number 76 1996
- Jacobson, M. Z. “Current and Future Effects of Black Carbon on Climate,” Proceedings of 2002 ETH Conference on Nano-Particle Measurement Zurich, Switzerland 2002
- Liu, Z. G. Verdegan B. M. Badeau K. M. Sonsalla T. P. “Measuring the Fractional Efficiency of Diesel Particulate Filters,” SAE 2002-01-1007 Diesel Exhaust Emission Control: SCR, HC, De-NO x , and Measurement SAE SP-1674 73 82 2002 SAE Transactions: J. Fuels and Lubricants 399 407 2002
- Liu, Z. G. Chen D-R. Perera N. Pingen G. Thurow E. M. Lincoln J. C. “Transient Analysis of Engine Nano-Particles Using a Fast-Scanning Differential Mobility Particle Analyzer,” SAE 2004-01-0971 Emissions Measurement and Testing SAE SP-1862 2004
- Kittelson, D. B. “Engines and Nanoparticles, A Review,” J. Aerosol Sci. 28 575 580 1998
- Blakeman, P. G. Chiffey A. F. Phillips P. R. Twigg M. V. Walker A. P. “Developments In Diesel Emission Aftertreatment Technology,” SAE 2003-01-3753 2003
- Hinds, W. C. “Aerosol Technology: Properties, Behavior, and Measurement of Airborne Particles,” John Wiley & Sons New York 1982
- Johnson, T. Caldow R. Pöcher A. Mirme A. Kittelson D. B. “A New Electrical Mobility Particle Sizer Spectrometer for Engine Exhaust Particle Measurements,” SAE 2004-01-1341 Testing and Instrumentation SAE SP-1871 2004
- “Emission Test Cycles: Heavy Duty FTP Transient Cycle.” DieselNet, Diesel Emissions Online www.dieselnet.com/standards/cycles/ftp_trans.html 7 26 2004
- Code of Federal Regulations Protection of the Environment 1998
- Cheng, S-w. S. “Rolling Regeneration Trap for Diesel Particulate Control,” SAE 2003-01-3178 2003
- Ulfvarson, U. “Diesel-Exhaust Tests Should be Revised with Respect to Health-Indicators,” SAE 2000-01-0235 2000
- Liu, Z. G. Miller R. K. Lincoln J. C. Zoran R. L. “Particle Sizing Experience with Various Diesel Particulate Filters,” Proceedings of 2002 ETH Conference on Nano-Particle Measurement Zurich, Switzerland 2002
- Mayer, A. Czerwinski J. Legerer F. Wyser M. “VERT Particulate Trap Verification,” SAE 2002-01-0435 2002
- Abdul-Khalek, I. S. Kittelson D. B. Brear F. “The Influence of Dilution Conditions on Diesel Exhaust Particle Size Distribution Measurements,” SAE 1999-01-1142 1999