This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
A Comparison of Burn Characteristics and Exhaust Emissions from Off-Highway Engines Fueled by E0 and E85
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published January 16, 2004 by The Automotive Research Association of India in India
Annotation ability available
Event: SIAT 2004
Ethanol fuel has received renewed attention in recent years because of its oxygenate content and its potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from spark ignition engines. The economic impact on farm industry has been one of the drivers for its use in engines in the U.S. Although ethanol, in various blends, has been used in automotive engines for almost a decade the fuel has seldom been utilized in off-highway engines where the fuel systems are not well controlled. This investigation was conducted to evaluate exhaust emissions and combustion characteristics of E85 fuel in an off-highway engine used in farm equipment. A single-cylinder, four-stroke, spark ignition engine equipped with a carburetor was used to investigate combustion and exhaust emissions produced by gasoline and blends of gasoline and ethanol fuels. The engine fuel system was modified to handle flow rates required by the engine. A variable size-metering orifice was used to control air-to-fuel ratios. The ignition system was modified to allow the operator to change ignition timing.
Ethanol blends improved specific energy consumption relative to E0. At stoichiometric air-to-fuel ratio the alcohol blends improved exhaust CO emissions marginally. However, there were consistent reductions in NOx levels with blends at the OEM ignition settings. Combustion of E85 in the engine resulted in higher levels of hydrocarbons relative to E0 over most of the engine operating conditions. The E85 engine exhaust contained aldehydes at concentrations much higher than those measured with the E0 and E10 fuels.
An examination of the engine revealed increased combustion chamber deposits after the engine was run on E-85 fuel for a prolonged period of time of over 150 hours. Analysis of cylinder pressure data showed that E85 had slightly faster main burn rate than the E0 fuel. Not much differences were noticed when E10 was used in the engine. Relative to E-0 the specific HC emissions increased when the engine was run on E-85 at the OEM spark timing while a smaller increase in HC was measured with the E10 fuel.
CitationVarde, K. and Clark, C., "A Comparison of Burn Characteristics and Exhaust Emissions from Off-Highway Engines Fueled by E0 and E85," SAE Technical Paper 2004-28-0045, 2004, https://doi.org/10.4271/2004-28-0045.
- Starkman, E. S. Newhall, H. K. Sutton, R. D. “Comparative Performance of Alcohol and Hydrocarbon Fuels” SAE Publication Alcohols as Motor Fuels 1 20 1980
- Bolt J. A. “A Survey of Alcohol as a Motor Fuel” SAE Publication SP-254 1964
- Black, F. “Overview of Technical Implications of Methanol and Ethanol as Highway Motor Vehicle Fuels” SAE Paper 912413 1991
- Bechtold, R. Pullman, J. B. “Driving Cycle Economy, Emissions and Photochemical Reactivity Using Alcohol Fuels and Gasoline” SAE Paper 800260 1980
- “Alternative Fuel Vehicles” 1996
- Wagner, T. Wyszynski, ML “Aldehydes and Ketones in Engine Exhaust Emissions - A Review” J. Auto Engr 109 122 1996
- “Just How Environmentally Friendly is Ethanol” A Report of Canadian Renewable Fuels Association 1999
- Metghalchi, M. Keck, J. C. “Burning Velocities of Mixtures of Air and Methanol, Isooctane, and Indolene at High Pressures and Temperature Combust. And Flame 48 191 10 1982