This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Hydrocarbons and Aldehydes from a Diesel Engine Running on Ethanol and Equipped With EGR, Catalyst and DPF
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published June 08, 2004 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
A commercially available exhaust aftertreatment system, DNOX™, comprising exhaust gas recirculation (EGR), an oxidative catalyst and a continuously regenerating diesel particulate filter (DPF) were tested. The test object was a 9-litre ethanol-fueled diesel engine from Scania equipped with turbocharger and aftercooler. A similar diesel engine from Scania, but running on ordinary Swedish diesel fuel, was used as a reference and a reminder of “the state of the art”. The tests involved two different ethanol fuels containing various ignition improvers, Beraid 3540 and rapeseed methyl ester. Test conditions for the engines were those specified in the European Stationary Cycle (ESC).
The aftertreatment system reduced the emissions of HC, CO and NOX, down to 0.15, 0.04 and 2.54 g/kWh, respectively, while the estimated particle mass was reduced by 67%. Actually, by using the DNOX™ system, the engines became Euro IV engines regarding the emissions of HC, CO and NOx.
The ethanol-fueled engine without EGR, catalyst or DPF emitted approximately 1.6 times more formaldehyde and 9.8 times more acetaldehyde than the diesel engine. However, the emission of acrolein was only 0.47 times the emission of acrolein from the diesel engine. When the ethanol-fueled engine was equipped with DNOX™, a significant reduction of the emissions of aldehydes was obtained. The emissions of acrolein, formaldehyde and acetaldehyde were reduced by 56%, 87% and 95%, respectively. An even higher reduction was observed when the system was connected to the diesel engine.
Fifteen different hydrocarbons (alkanes, olefins and monoaromates) were also identified. The diesel-fueled engine, without any exhaust aftertreatment devices, emitted approximately twice as much hydrocarbon than the ethanol-fueled engine, also without any exhaust aftertreatment devices. However, there were also qualitative differences. Three hydrocarbons, namely propene, ethene and benzene, accounted for 77 % of the hydrocarbons emitted from the diesel-fueled engine, while acetylene, ethene and benzene, made up only 53% of the hydrocarbons emitted from the ethanol-fueled engine. When connecting the system to the engines, a difference was observed; the reduction of analyzed hydrocarbon emissions was approximately 90% for the diesel-fueled engine, but only 47% for the ethanol-fueled engine.
The studied aftertreatment system has been developed and optimized for the diesel-fueled engine. This fact is reflected in the powerful reduction of hydrocarbons, aldehydes, particles and NOX that is obtained when connecting the system to the diesel-fueled engine. Nevertheless, a significant reduction is also obtained when connecting the system to the ethanol-fueled engine. Test results indicate that it should be possible to better optimize the system for the ethanol engine. It is also, probably, necessary to exchange the catalyst in the system. Thereby, an even higher reduction of unregulated and regulated emissions should be obtained.
CitationHaupt, D., Nord, K., Egebäck, K., and Ahlvik, P., "Hydrocarbons and Aldehydes from a Diesel Engine Running on Ethanol and Equipped With EGR, Catalyst and DPF," SAE Technical Paper 2004-01-1882, 2004, https://doi.org/10.4271/2004-01-1882.
Engine Lubricants, Effects of Fuels and Lubricants on Automotive Devices, and Lubricant Applications and New Test Methods
Number: SP-1885 ; Published: 2004-06-08
Number: SP-1885 ; Published: 2004-06-08
- Owen, K., Coley, T. “Automotive Fuels Reference Book” 2 nd Ed. Society of Automotive Engineers,, ISBN 1-56091-589-7, (1995).
- Månsson T, “Rena fordon med biodrivmedel” KFB-rapport 1998:1( in Swedish), ISBN 91-88868-1 (1998)
- Pressrelease from the Swedish Petroleum Institute. 2001-01.23 (2001).
- Egebäck, K-E., Pettersson, E. “Research on a Scania 11 liter Ethanol Fueled Bus Engine”. Research Report. TULEA 1996:13 (1996).
- Ahlvik, P., Brandberg, Å.R.L., “Relative Impact on Environment and Health from the Introduction of Low Emission City Buses in Sweden.”, SAE Technical Paper 2000-01-1882, (2000).
- Pettersson L. J., Wahlberg A. M.,Järås, S., “An Introductory Study of Multifunctional Catalysts for Ethanol and Biogas Vehicle” KFB - Rapport 1998:12, (1998).
- Chatterjee S., Conway R., Viswanathan S., Blomquist M., Klüsener B., Andersson S., “NOx and PM control from Heavy Duty Diesel Engines using a Combination of Low Pressure EGR and Continuously Regenerating Diesel Particulate Filter” SAE Technical Paper 2003-01-0048. (2003).
- Larsson, E “Final report on the project Development and Testing of RME as an Ignition Improver for Neat Bio-Ethanol as Diesel fuel-an Extension of the so Called Esterol Project” Report to the European Commission, the Alternative Program, According to Contract No. XVII/4.1030/A/98-597. (1998).
- Nord K., Haupt D., “Statistical Evaluation of Rapeseed Methyl Ester as Ignition Improver in a 11 liters Ethanol Fueled Diesel Engine”, proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Technologies and Combustion for a Clean Environment, 2001, Oporto, Portugal. (2001).
- Cooper B.J., Thoss J.E. “Role of NO in Diesel Particulate Control” SAE Technical paper 890404.(1989).
- Andersson, S., STT Emtec, Personal communications (2003).
- Iraneta P., “Waters XPoSure (tm) Aldehyde Sampling Cartridges for Air Monitoring Applications” Waters Sample Prep Notes / Year: 1995 / Volume: SPN 4, (1995).
- Lipari, F., “Determination of individual hydrocarbons in automobile exhaust from gasoline-, methanol-, and variable-fueled vehicles” J. of Chromatography, vol 503, pp 51-68. (1990).
- Jensen, T. E., Siegl, W. O., Richert, J.F.O., Lipari, F., Loo, J. F., Prostak, A., Sigsby, J.E., “Advanced Emission Speciation Methodologies for the Auto /Oil Air Quality Improvement Research Program -1 Hydrocarbons and Ethers.”, SAE Technical Paper 920320. (1992).
- Haupt, D., Nord, K., Ahlvik, P., Egebäck, K.-E., “Investigating the Potential to Obtain Low Emissions from a Diesel Engine Running on Ethanol and Equipped with EGR, Catalyst and DPF.”, SAE Technical Paper 2004-01-1884. (2004).
- Nord, K., Haupt, D., Ahlvik, P., Egebäck, K.-E., “Particulate Emissions from an Ethanol Fueled Heavy Duty Diesel Engine Equipped with EGR, Catalyst and DPF.”, SAE Technical Paper 2004-01-1987. (2004).
- Manahan S.E., “Environmental Chemistry, 7th ed.” Lewis Publishers, ISBN 1-56670-492-8. (1999).
- Mitchell, K.; Steere, D.E.; Taylor, J.A.; Manicom, B., Fisher, J.E., Sienicki, E.J., Chiu, C., Williams, P., “Impact of diesel fuel aromatics on particulate, pah and nitro- pah emissions.” SAE Technical Paper 942053., (1994).
- Pettersson E., Lindberg W.“Exhaust Emissions from an Ethanol Fulled Diesel Engine with EGR”, Proceedings to the 27th ISATA, Achen, Germany, 1994. (1994)
- Törnqvist, M. and Ehrenberg, L. “On Cancer Risk Health Risk Perspectives, 1994, pages 173-182. (1994).
- U.S EPA Cancer risk from outdoor air toxics, Vol1. Washington: United States Environmental Protection Agency1990;450-451, (1990).
- Haupt D., Nordström F., Hellberg S., Uvemo U-B. “Characterization of components classified as hydrocarbons when using a heated flame ionization detector for measurement of exhaust gases from an 11 liters ethanol fueled engine”. ISAF XIII, Stockholm 2000. (2000).