This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Virtual Testing of Driver OOP Scenarios: Effect of Modeling Detail on Injury Response
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published March 08, 2004 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
This study investigates the relevance of certain parameters for virtual testing of the driver's side OOP problem and attempts to answer the following questions: Which level of detail is needed in the airbag models to assess occupants' injury values for OOP scenarios? What is the influence of the airbag cover on the occupant response for OOP situations and how to accurately model the airbag cover? Are current dummy models suitable to assess the localized human injuries and/or is it beneficial to include human models for injury assessment?
The combined multibody-FE code MADYMO was used. A virtual set-up of a folded driver airbag including cover, steering wheel and a simple seat forms the base model. Occupants were positioned according to the two OOP driver positions defined in FMVSS 208, i.e. chin on module to maximize neck injury risk and chest on module to maximize chest injury risk. The 5th percentile Hybrid III dummy model as well as the 5th percentile human model were used and different airbag inflation and cover modeling techniques were investigated. Attention was focussed on analyses of the injury values obtained from the simulations of the different situations (with / without cover, use of gasflow, human / dummy model).
From this study, it is concluded that it is important to take into account the geometrical effects of the airbag cover on airbag deployment and hence injury generation in OOP simulations. Adding a gasflow description to the airbag deployment simulation resulted in differences in the early deployment phase. If the dummy's injuries are determined in this phase (dependent of scenario), gasflow contributes to improved airbag modeling at the cost of higher CPU times. From the human model simulations, it is concluded that for this specific scenario, using dummy models could lead to underestimation of human injuries in the chest region, in contrast to overestimation of the head acceleration and the neck loads in the rebound phase. Therefore, human models could provide additional value compared to dummy models.
|Appling CAE to Understand the Causality of Dummy Neck Injury Readings
|The Effect of Limiting Shoulder Belt Load with Air Bag Restraint
|Simulation of BioSID Head-Neck Motions
CitationBosch-Rekveldt, M. and van Hoof, J., "Virtual Testing of Driver OOP Scenarios: Effect of Modeling Detail on Injury Response," SAE Technical Paper 2004-01-1629, 2004, https://doi.org/10.4271/2004-01-1629.
CAE Methods for Vehicle Crashworthiness and Occupant Safety, and Safety-Critical Systems
Number: SP-1870; Published: 2004-03-08
Number: SP-1870; Published: 2004-03-08
- Rekveldt Marian Swartjes Frank Steenbrink Sander TNO Automotive Delft “Airbag modeling for Out-of-Position: Numerical approach and advanced airbag testing” MADYMO User Conference 2002 Italy
- Happee, R. Ridella, S. Nayef, A. Morsink, P. de Lange, R. Bours, R. van Hoof, J. “Mathematical human body models representing a mid size male and a small female for frontal, lateral and rearward impact loading” IRCOBI Conference 2000
- ADVANCE EU 5 th framework project
- MADYMO Human body models manual
- Evans Leonard Operating Sciences Department, General Motors Research Laboratories Warren USA “Restraint effectiveness, occupant ejection from cars and fatality reductions.” Accid.Anal.&Prev. 22 2 167 175 1990
- Kirk Alan Frampton Richard Thomas Pete VSRC Loughborough University UK “An evaluation of airbag benefits / disbenefits in European Vehicles, a combined statistical and case study approach.” IRCOBI conference 2002
- Roselt Thomas Hummel Klaus Langwiederm Thomas Koster Hans-Jurgen German Insurance Association, Institute for Vehicle Safety Germany “Injury patterns of front seat occupants in frontal car collisions with airbags” IRCOBI conference 2002
- Pilkey W.D. “Out-of-position (OOPS) ISO-1 position series 2 tests, using a 5 th % Hybrid-III dummy and 1 cadaver, ATD.53.C.416 and CAD.57.425” NHTSA report DTNH22-93-Y-07028 Automobile Safety Laboratory of the University of Virginia 1998