This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
A Dual-Use Enterprise Context for Vehicle Design and Technology Valuation
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published March 08, 2004 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
Developing a new technology requires decision-makers to understand the technology's implications on an organization's objectives, which depend on user needs targeted by the technology. If these needs are common between two organizations, collaboration could result in more efficient technology development. For hybrid truck design, both commercial manufacturers and the military have similar performance needs. As the new technology penetrates the truck market, the commercial enterprise must quantify how the hybrid's superior fuel efficiency will impact consumer purchasing and, thus, future enterprise profits. The Army is also interested in hybrid technology as it continues its transformation to a more fuel-efficient force. Despite having different objectives, maximizing profit and battlefield performance, respectively, the commercial enterprise and Army can take advantage of their mutual needs. Developing the new technology in a dual-use context allows the Army to leverage the design and production capabilities of the commercial enterprise, while the enterprise increases its hybrid production volume with military trucks during the low demand phase of hybrid market penetration.
This article describes the valuation of hybrid technology from both the enterprise and military perspectives using a previously developed enterprise decision model, which utilizes comprehensive vehicle simulation to drive decision-making. The enterprise is represented in a mathematical formulation that simultaneously optimizes initial vehicle design, product pricing, operating costs associated with capacity investment and design decisions, and the value created by the new products. The application of hybrid technology in the medium truck market illustrates the impact of dual-use decision-making on the commercial enterprise and satisfaction of military performance targets.
CitationCooper, A., Kokkolaras, M., and Papalambros, P., "A Dual-Use Enterprise Context for Vehicle Design and Technology Valuation," SAE Technical Paper 2004-01-1588, 2004, https://doi.org/10.4271/2004-01-1588.
- Skalny, P.F., Smith A.J., Powell D., 2001. “21st Century Truck Initiative Support to the Army Transformation Process,” SAE Int. SAE Paper 2001-01-2772.
- Kozera, M.J., Fuller-Simms G., and Gorsich D.J., 2001. “Telematics for ‘SmarTruck’,” SAE Int. SAE Paper 2001-01-2795.
- Ernat, J.S., Harris W.G., and Trzaska T., 2001. “Advanced Hybrid Electric Drive (AHED) Technology Demonstrator,” SAE Int. SAE Paper 2001-01-2774.
- Almond, H., Doolittle W., and Klees G., 2001. “Hybrid Propulsion Truck Platform Dually Developed by the U.S. Army and DaimlerChrysler,” SAE Int. SAE Paper 2001-01-2794.
- Kluger, M.A., Szkubiel D., and Bass E.A., 2001. “A Dual-Use Hybrid Electric Command and Control Vehicle,” SAE Int. SAE Paper 2001-01-2775.
- Cooper, A.B. and Papalambros P.Y., 2003. “An Enterprise Decision Model for Optimal Vehicle Design and Technology Valuation,” ASME 2003 IMECE, Washington, D.C. (in review).
- Cooper, A.B, 2003. An Enterprise Decision Model for Optimal Vehicle Design and Technology Valuation, M.Sc. Thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
- Afuah, A, 1998. Innovation Management, Oxford University Press, NY.
- Dixit, A.K., and Pindyck R.S., 1994. Investment Under Uncertainty. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
- An, F., Stodolsky F., Vyas A., Cuenca R., and Eberhardt J.J., 2000. Scenario Analysis of Hybrid Class 3-7 Heavy Vehicles. SAE Int. SAE Paper 2000-01-0989.
- Morrison, C.J., 1993. A Microeconomic Approach to the Measurement of Economic Performance: Productivity Growth, Capacity Utilization, and Related Performance Indicators, Springer-Verlag, New York.
- Lin, C.-C., Filipi, Z.S., Wang, Y., Louca, L., Peng, H., Assanis, D.N., and Stein J.L., 2001. “Integrated, Feed-Forward Hybrid Electric Vehicle Simulation in SIMULINK and its Use for Power Management Studies,” SAE 2001 World Congress, Detroit, Michigan, SAE Paper 2001-01-1334.
- EPA, 2002. Nonconformance Penalties for 2004 Highway Heavy Duty Diesel Engines, Draft Technical Support Document. Environmental Protection Agency.
- Argote, L. and Epple D., 1990. “Learning Curves in Manufacturing,” Science, 247, 920-924.
- Dixit, A.K, and Pindyck R.S., 2000. “Expandability, Reversibility, and Optimal Capacity Choice.” Trigeorgis, L. and Brennan M.J. (Eds), 2000. Project Flexibility, Agency, and Competition, Oxford University Press, New York.
- Navistar, 1997. 10-k report, http://www.shareholder.com/nav
- Brealey, R.A., and Myers S.C., 2000. Principles of Corporate Finance, Irwin/McGraw-Hill, Boston, MA.
- Stewart and Stevenson Inc., 2002. http://www.ssss.com/fmtv/
- Caterpillar, 2003. http://www.caterpillar.com/
- Adner, R., and Levinthal D., 2001. “Demand Heterogeneity and Technology Evolution: Implications for Product and Process Innovation,” Management Sci. 47, 611-628.
- Jones, D., 1999. “DIRECT,” Encyclopedia of Optimization, Kluwar Academic Publishers.