This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Crash Severity: A Comparison of Event Data Recorder Measurements with Accident Reconstruction Estimates
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published March 08, 2004 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
The primary description of crash severity in most accident databases is vehicle delta-V. Delta-V has been traditionally estimated through accident reconstruction techniques using computer codes, e.g. Crash3 and WinSmash. Unfortunately, delta-V is notoriously difficult to estimate in many types of collisions including sideswipes, collisions with narrow objects, angled side impacts, and rollovers. Indeed, approximately 40% of all delta-V estimates for inspected vehicles in the National Automotive Sampling System / Crashworthiness Data System (NASS/CDS) 2001 are reported as unknown.
The Event Data Recorders (EDRs), now being installed as standard equipment by several automakers, have the potential to provide an independent measurement of crash severity which avoids many of the difficulties of accident reconstruction techniques. This paper evaluates the feasibility of replacing delta-V estimates from accident reconstruction with the delta-V recorded by EDRs. The analysis is based on over 500 NASS/CDS cases from 2000 - 2002 which have corresponding EDR datasets. The potential of extracting manual belt use from EDRs is also discussed and compared with the corresponding results from NASS gathered by accident investigators. Although EDRs can greatly enhance the investigation of a crash, the study finds that current EDRs are not perfect. The paper discusses the limitations of current EDR technology and the opportunites for enhancement of future Event Data Recorders.
|Technical Paper||The Accuracy of Pre-Crash Speed Captured by Event Data Recorders|
|Technical Paper||The Accuracy and Sensitivity of Event Data Recorders in Low-Speed Collisions|
|Technical Paper||Using Event Data Recorders in Collision Reconstruction|
CitationGabler, H., Hampton, C., and Hinch, J., "Crash Severity: A Comparison of Event Data Recorder Measurements with Accident Reconstruction Estimates," SAE Technical Paper 2004-01-1194, 2004, https://doi.org/10.4271/2004-01-1194.
- Chidester, A. Hinch, J. Roston, T. “Real World Experience With Event Data Recorders” Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles Amsterdam, Netherlands June 2001
- Gabler, H.C. Hampton, C. Event Data Recorders: Engineering Evaluation of Initial Field Data, Letter Report prepared for National Highway Traffic Safety Administration September 2002
- Gabler, H.C. Hampton, C. Roston, T. “Estimating Crash Severity: Can Event Data Recorders Replace Crash Reconstruction?” Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Enhanced Safety of Vehicles Nagoya, Japan May 2003
- Lawrence, J.M. King, D.J. Wilkinson, C.C. Heinrichs, B.E. Siegmund, G.P. “The Accuracy and Sensitivity of Event Data Recorders in Low Speed -Collisions” SAE Paper 2002-01-0679 March 2002
- CRASH3 User's Guide and Technical Manual National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Final Report 1981 1982
- Event Data Recorders, Summary of Findings by the NHTSA Working Group National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Final Report April 2001
- O'Neill, B Preuss, C.A. Nolan, J.M. “Relationships between Computed delta V and Impact Speeds for Offset Crashes” Paper No. 96 S0-O-11, Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles Melbourne, Australia May 1996
- Stucki, S.L. Fessahaie, O. “Comparison of Measured Velocity Change in Frontal Crash Tests to NASS Computed Velocity Change” SAE Paper 980649 February 1998