This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Mass Impacts on Fuel Economies of Conventional vs. Hybrid Electric Vehicles
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published March 08, 2004 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
The strong correlation between vehicle weight and fuel economy for conventional vehicles (CVs) is considered common knowledge, and the relationship of mass reduction to fuel consumption reduction for conventional vehicles (CVs) is often cited without separating effects of powertrain vs. vehicle body (glider), nor on the ground of equivalent vehicle performance level. This paper challenges the assumption that this relationship is easily summarized. Further, for hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs) the relationship between mass, performance and fuel consumption is not the same as for CVs, and vary with hybrid types. For fully functioning (all wheel regeneration) hybrid vehicles, where battery pack and motor(s) have enough power and energy storage, a very large fraction of kinetic energy is recovered and engine idling is effectively eliminated. This paper assesses two important impacts of shifting from conventional to hybrid vehicles in terms of the mass vs. fuel economy relationship - 1) significant improvements in fuel economy with little or no change in mass, and 2) once a switch to hybrid powertrains has been made, the effectiveness of mass reduction in improving fuel economy will be diminished relative to conventional vehicles. In this paper, we discuss vehicle tractive load breakdowns and impacts of hybridization on vehicle efficiency, discuss capture of kinetic energy by conversion to electrical energy via regenerative braking, assess benefits of shutting off the engine when the vehicle does not require power, and investigate energy losses associated with vehicle mass.
CitationAn, F. and Santini, D., "Mass Impacts on Fuel Economies of Conventional vs. Hybrid Electric Vehicles," SAE Technical Paper 2004-01-0572, 2004, https://doi.org/10.4271/2004-01-0572.
SAE 2004 Transactions Journal of Fuels and Lubricants
Number: V113-4; Published: 2005-07-05
Number: V113-4; Published: 2005-07-05
- National Research Council 2002 Effectiveness and Impact of Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards National Academy Press Washington D.C.
- An, F. Santini D. 2003 “Assessing Tank-to-Wheel Efficiencies of Advanced Technology Vehicles,” SAE Paper No. 2003-01-0412 Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, Pa
- An, F. Vyas A. Anderson J. Santini D. 2001 “Evaluating Commercial and Prototype HEVs,” SAE Paper No. 2001-01-0951 Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, Pa
- An, F. DeCicco J. Ross M. 2001 “Assessing the Fuel Economy Potential of Light Duty Vehicles,” SAE paper 2001-01FTT-31 Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, PA
- Weiss et al. 2000 On the Road in 2020: A Life-Cycle Analysis of New Automobile Technologies MIT Energy Laboratory Energy Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, Mass. Oct.
- General Motors Corp. et al. 2001 Well-to-Wheel Energy Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Advanced Fuel/Vehicle Systems - North American Analysis, Executive Summary Report Argonne National Laboratory's Transportation Technology Research and Development Center http://www.transportation.anl.gov/
- An, F. Stodolsky F. Santini D. 1999 “Hybrid Options for Light-Duty Vehicles,” SAE paper 1999-01-2929 Electric and Hybrid Electric Vehicles and Fuel Cell Technology Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, Penn. Future Transportation Technology Conference Costa Mesa, Calif. Aug.
- Graham, R. et al. 2001 Comparing the Benefits and Impacts of Hybrid Electric Vehicle Options July 2000 Electric Power Research Institute Palo Alto, Calif
- Plotkin, S. et al. 2001 Hybrid Vehicle Technology Assessment: Methodology, Analytical Issues, and Interim Results Argonne National Laboratory Argonne, Ill
- Santini, D.J. et al. 2002 “Hybridizing with Engine Downsizing,” 81st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board Washington, D.C. Jan. 13 17
- Hellman, K. Heavenrich R. “Light-Duty Automotive Technology and Fuel Economy Trends: 1975 Through 2003” EPA 2003
- Toyota Hybrid System Press Release 1997 & 2001 Hybrid Synergy Drive, THSII 2004
- Sovran G. Blaser D. 2003 “A Contribution to Understand Automotive Fuel Economy and Its Limits SAE Paper No. 2003-01-2070 Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, Pa.
- Evans, D. G. et al. 2002 “Powertrain Architecture and Controls Integration for GM's Hybrid Full-Size Pickup Truck” SAE Paper No. 2003-01-0085 Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, Pa.
- Hermance, D. “New Efficiency Baseline 2004 Prius.” Electric Power Research Institute Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle Workshop Long Beach, CA. Nov. 15 2003
- Barth, M. An F. Younglove T. Scora G. Wensel T. Ross Marc 2000 NCHRP Project 25-11: Development of a Comprehensive Modal Emissions Model - the Final Report National Research Council Washington DC 2001
- An, F. Aymeric Rousseau “Integration of a Modal Energy and Emissions Model into a PNGV Vehicle Simulation Model PSAT,” SAE Paper No. 2001-01-0954 Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, Pa
- Duoba M. Ng H. Larsen R. In-Situ Mapping and Analysis of the Toyota Prius HEV Engine SAE 2000-01-3096 Costa Mesa, California Aug. 21 23 2000
- Santini, D. Anderson J. Some Evidence on Determinants of Fuel Economy as a Function of Driving cycle and Test Type SAE 931804 1993