This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Reliability Problem Prevention Method for Automotive Components - Development of GD 3 Activity and DRBFM (Design Review Based on Failure Mode)-
Technical Paper
2003-01-2877
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
Recently, the concept of Mizen Boushi (reliability problem prevention) has been applied in automotive development as a tool to refine drawings to the greatest completion possible by the prototype stage. GD3 is a quality innovation process that supports this objective, based on the pillars of Good Design, Good Discussion, and Good Design Review. Good Design tries to nip problems in the bud, and Good Discussion and Good Design Review are used to formulate the best countermeasures to those problems.
The process utilizes creative FMEA (Failure Mode & Effects Analysis), FTA (Fault Tree Analysis), and a System Design Review. These tools focus attention on the many potential problems that could occur due to a change in design or environment. The System Design Review is especially useful to examine potential failure modes, root causes, part drawings, and prototype part designs. This is followed by a Design Review Based on Failure Mode (DRBFM for short), as a tool to guide discussion. In this way, it is possible to generate the best approach to handling design, evaluation, and production concerns. This paper will introduce some of the specific ways that this creative process is currently used in development as a tool to prevent problems.
Recommended Content
Authors
Citation
Shimizu, H., Imagawa, T., and Noguchi, H., "Reliability Problem Prevention Method for Automotive Components - Development of GD3 Activity and DRBFM (Design Review Based on Failure Mode)-," SAE Technical Paper 2003-01-2877, 2003, https://doi.org/10.4271/2003-01-2877.Also In
References
- Yoshimura T. “Toyota Quality Prevention Method, GD 3 ” JUSE Press 2002
- Yoshimura T. “Look into the Engineering through the Logistic Curve” Japanese mechanical society magazine 99 936 1996 937 941
- Yoshimura T. “Solution and Prevention Method for Reliability Issues from Logistic Curve” Quality Control 51 3 2000 266 2703
- Shimizu H. “Creative Design Review for Automotive Components” 30th Reliability & Maintainability Symposium JUSE 2000 165 170
- Taguchi G. “Quality Engineering at Development Process” Japan Standard Association 1988